Hon. Clay H. Kaminsky — Individual Rules of Practice
E.D.N.Y.
Courtroom: 504
What Clay H. Kaminsky's rules say, in the court's own words
Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.
How much notice is required to adjourn?
3
“on ECF as a “Motion,” not as a “Letter” or “Status Report,” at least three (3) business days prior to the conference or deadline (absent an emergency).”
Which courtroom hears this part?
504
“Courtroom 504 North Chambers 505 North”
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
Individual Practices and Rules of
Magistrate Judge Clay H. Kaminsky
Effective June 15, 2026
United States District Court
Eastern District of New York
225 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, New York 11201
Courtroom 504 North Chambers 505 North
Shannon Hernandez Kaminsky_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov
(718) 613-2174
Unless otherwise ordered in a specific case, civil cases before Judge Kaminsky
will be conducted in accordance with the following practices and rules:
I. COMMUNICATIONS WITH CHAMBERS
A. ECF generally required. Except as provided below, communications with
Chambers should be by ECF only, using the appropriate event type (e.g.,
“Motion” if requesting Court action) and a brief description of the document.
No courtesy copies should be submitted absent a request by the Court.
B. Pro se litigants are exempt from ECF requirements but may request
permission to file documents and receive notices electronically.1
1. Pro se litigants must follow instructions from the Clerk’s Office on
communicating with the Court and must keep current contact information
on file with the Court or risk dismissal of claims or other consequences.
2. Counsel in cases involving pro se litigants who have not consented to
electronic notifications must serve copies of ECF submissions on the pro se
party and file certificates of service in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.
Counsel should also review Local Civil Rules 7.2, 12.1, 33.2, and 56.2.
1 Instructions and eligibility requirements are available at
https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/pro-se-document-submission-and-consent-notifications.
C. Requests for adjournments, extensions, and changes to conferences
(such as a request to appear by telephone) must be made by letter motion filed
on ECF as a “Motion,” not as a “Letter” or “Status Report,” at least three (3)
business days prior to the conference or deadline (absent an emergency).
1. Required contents. Motions for adjournment or extension must state
(1) the original date, (2) the number of previous adjournments or
extensions, (3) the effect on other scheduled dates, (4) the reason for the
request, and (5) the position of each other party as to the request.
2. Good cause. A party seeking to extend discovery or a case-management
deadline must establish “good cause,” even if the request is on consent. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Extensions of discovery will not be granted based
on another party’s or non-party’s non-compliance with discovery obligations
unless the movant timely pursued legal remedies to obtain compliance.
D. Telephone calls. Counsel may contact the Courtroom Deputy at (718) 613-
2174 with questions about scheduling, but adjournments must be requested by
motion. Pro se parties may call the Court’s Pro Se Office at (718) 613-2665.
E. Emails to Chambers (Kaminsky_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov) are permitted
only as provided in these Rules or as otherwise directed by the Court.
II. CASE MANAGEMENT AND DISCOVERY
A. Knowledgeable counsel of record is expected to appear at all conferences
authorized to make stipulations and admissions to streamline discovery and prepared
to discuss all aspects of the case, including settlement. Law students and junior
attorneys are encouraged to appear and argue under the supervision of such counsel.
B. Initial conferences will typically be held in person. The party invoking the
Court’s jurisdiction (i.e., the plaintiff or removing defendant) is responsible for
informing all other parties of the date and time of the initial conference.
1. Rule 26 obligations in advance of the initial conference. The parties
must hold their Rule 26(f) planning meeting at least three weeks before the
initial conference. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(1). The parties must make their Rule
26(a)(1) initial disclosures to each other and file a Rule 26(f) report (proposed
discovery plan) using the form provided on Judge Kaminsky’s webpage no later
than one week before the initial conference. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C), (f)(2).
2
C. Discovery disputes should be raised pursuant to Local Civil Rule 37.2 with
the following modifications. In lieu of separate letters, the parties must
describe their dispute(s) in a single letter motion, jointly composed, filed
on ECF as a “Motion.” A party may write separately only if the other party fails
to cooperate regarding the joint submission. The letter motion may not exceed
five pages. The Court will seek to resolve discovery disputes quickly, by order
(based on the letter motion alone) or through a discovery conference.
1. Meet and confer requirement. Strict adherence to Fed. R. Civ. P.
37(a)(1) is required, and the parties’ efforts should be described in the joint
submission as to time, place, and duration, naming the counsel involved.
2. Specificity. In raising discovery disputes, the parties must clearly state
the issues requiring resolution and the specific relief sought as to each
dispute. See Local Civil Rule 37.1. Assertions of law must be supported by
citations to authority, including case law. If necessary, the parties should
excerpt the at-issue material; they should not attach, unless absolutely
necessary, entire sets of discovery requests. The Court will not entertain
generalized, bulk objections to discovery requests or responses.
3. Timeliness and waiver. Counsel should seek relief in accordance with
these procedures in a timely fashion. Failure to timely request Court
assistance to remedy another party’s or non-party’s non-compliance with
discovery obligations may result in a waiver of the requested discovery,
particularly if a party waits until near the close of discovery to raise an
issue that could have been raised earlier.
D. Disputes during ongoing depositions. If a dispute arises during a
deposition that the parties cannot resolve themselves, they must contact
Chambers immediately by both email and telephone. The email should include
a brief description of the dispute and a callback number. The parties must not
discontinue the deposition while waiting for the Court to return the call.
Instead, they must have the court reporter mark the transcript where the
dispute arose and must move on to other issues in the deposition. When the
Court calls, the court reporter must be present on the call to record any rulings.
E. Confidentiality orders. To assist the parties, the Court has provided a form
confidentiality order on its webpage that the parties may submit for approval
to protect the confidentiality of information exchanged in discovery. If changes
are sought, the parties must submit a redline with their motion for approval.
3
III. MOTION PRACTICE
A. Non-dispositive motions other than discovery motions (for which see
II.C above) may be made to Judge Kaminsky in accordance with the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules. Prior to bringing a motion,
the movant must seek the consent of each other party, and the motion must
state whether it is on consent.
B. Dispositive motions must be made to the presiding District Judge in
accordance with his or her individual rules, unless the parties have consented
to Judge Kaminsky pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). In cases assigned to Judge
Kaminsky pursuant to the EDNY Direct Assignment Program, the parties
should file either a consent form (if all parties consent) or a Direct Assignment
Program acknowledgement form (if not all parties consent) prior to initiating
dispositive motion practice. In consent cases, the following rules apply:
1. Pre-motion submissions are required for Rule 12 and Rule 56
motions in cases in which all parties are represented by counsel, except in
habeas and social security cases. The putative movant must request a pre-
motion conference by submitting a letter motion, not to exceed three (3)
pages, setting forth the bases for the anticipated motion. Similarly situated
parties (e.g., multiple defendants moving to dismiss on overlapping
grounds) should make reasonable efforts to consolidate their pre-motion
submission(s) to avoid duplication. Filing the pre-motion letter motion
within the time requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56 shall constitute
timely service of a motion made pursuant to those provisions. All parties
served with the pre-motion letter must submit a letter response, not to
exceed three (3) pages, within one week. Replies are not permitted.
After reviewing the parties’ pre-motion submissions, the Court will
determine whether to hold a premotion conference or to set a briefing
schedule on submission. In appropriate cases, the Court may exercise its
discretion to construe the pre-motion letter as the motion itself.
2. All other dispositive motions may be made in accordance with the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules. Pre-motion
conference requests are not required for any motion listed in Fed. R. App.
P. 4(a)(4) or any other motion for which a party concludes in good faith that
delaying the filing of a motion will deprive it of a substantive right.
4
IV. TRIALS ON CONSENT
In consent cases, Judge Kaminsky will set a firm trial date in consultation with
the parties after receiving the proposed joint pretrial order.
A. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order. Sixty (60) days after the close of all
discovery or thirty (30) days after the resolution of any motion for summary
judgment, whichever is later, the parties must file a joint proposed pretrial
order containing the following information:
1. Caption. The full caption of the action.
2. Parties and Counsel. The names, addresses (including firm names), and
telephone numbers of trial counsel.
3. Jurisdiction. A brief statement by the plaintiff explaining the basis of
subject matter jurisdiction, and a brief statement by each other party as to
the presence or absence of subject matter jurisdiction. These statements
shall include citations to all (a) statutes and legal doctrines relied on, and
(b) relevant facts concerning citizenship and jurisdictional amount.
4. Claims and Defenses. A brief summary by each party of the elements of
its remaining asserted claims and defenses. These summaries shall include
citations to all statutes relied on but should not recite evidentiary matters.
5. Damages. A statement of the damages claimed and any other relief sought,
including the manner and method used to calculate any claimed damages
and a breakdown of the elements of such claimed damages.
6. Jury or Bench Trial. A statement by each party as to whether the case is
to be tried with or without a jury, and the number of trial days needed.
7. Stipulations. A statement of stipulated facts, if any.
8. Witnesses. A list of all fact and expert witnesses to be called by each party,
along with a brief narrative statement of the expected testimony of each
witness. Only listed witnesses will be permitted to testify, except when
prompt notice is given and good cause is shown. Any motion to exclude
expert testimony pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702–05 and Daubert v. Merrell
Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) must be submitted no later
than contemporaneously with the proposed joint pretrial order.
5
9. Deposition Testimony. A designation by each party of deposition
testimony to be offered in its case in chief, with any cross-designations and
objections by any other party.
10. Exhibits. A table listing the exhibits to be offered in evidence. Except for
impeachment and rebuttal exhibits, which need not be listed, only listed
exhibits will be received into evidence, except for good cause shown. All
exhibits must be pre-marked (using “PX” for plaintiffs’ exhibits, “DX” for
defendants’ exhibits, and “JX” for joint exhibits). The table should briefly
describe each exhibit and state any objection to admissibility and the
proponent’s response to any objection. Parties are expected to resolve before
trial all issues of authenticity, chain of custody, and related matters.
B. Filings Prior to Trial.
1. Motions in limine must be filed at least three weeks before trial, except
that Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony must be filed no later
than the deadline for submission of the proposed joint pretrial order. All
motions in limine by a party must be filed in a single submission. Responses
are due one week later.
2. Requests to charge, verdict sheet, and proposed voir dire. For jury
trials, the parties should submit joint requests to charge, a proposed verdict
sheet, and proposed voir dire questions no later than two weeks before trial.
Requests to charge should be limited to the elements of the claims and
defenses, the damages sought, and any case-specific issues. Proposed voir
dire questions should also be case-specific and should include a brief
statement of the case and a list of relevant people, places, and entities to be
read during jury selection. General instructions and questions will be
prepared by the Court. Where the parties cannot reach agreement, they
should indicate each party’s proposal and/or one party’s proposal with an
explanation of the other party’s objection. At the time of filing, the parties
should also email word processing files of these documents to Chambers.
3. Trial memoranda. For bench trials, each party should submit a pretrial
memorandum at least two weeks before trial.
4. Exhibits. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties should provide
the Court with two tabbed binders containing copies of all exhibits no later
than the Thursday before trial.
6
V. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES
A. Attendance. Each party, or a decision-making representative with full
settlement authority for each party, must attend the settlement conference.
The Court will excuse a party from attendance only upon letter motion filed by
ECF establishing (1) attendance would work a hardship on the party, (2) the
party has agreed to give counsel broad settlement authority, and (3) the party
will be immediately available by phone for the duration of the settlement
conference to approve any proposed settlement. The letter motion must state
whether any other party objects. The Comptroller of the City of New York has
standing permission to proceed in this way and need not make a separate
motion in each case. A party that fails to attend the settlement conference
without having been excused by the Court in advance may be required to
reimburse all other parties for their time and travel expenses.
B. Exchange of thoughtful settlement proposals between the parties.
Plaintiff must convey a settlement proposal to defendant at least fourteen (14)
before the settlement conference. Defendant must convey a settlement
proposal to plaintiff at least eight (8) days prior to the settlement conference.
These proposals may not be bare numbers; each must include a rationale.
C. Confidential ex parte settlement communications with the Court.
Represented parties must email a confidential ex parte settlement statement
to Chambers one week before the settlement conference. The statement should
not exceed five (5) pages and must contain: (1) a concise statement of the
issue(s) in dispute; (2) case law authorities and any comparators relevant to
settlement discussions; (3) the history of settlement negotiations and current
proposals; (4) counsel’s evaluation of the settlement value of the case and the
rationale for it; (5) identification of the strengths and weaknesses of each side’s
case, to the extent not already included; and (6) any other information (e.g.,
about the client’s priorities) that would be helpful to the Court in preparing for
the conference. The statement should also identify the persons who will attend
the conference (but may not make a request to excuse a party). Parties may,
but need not, attach especially significant exhibits they believe would aid
settlement discussions.2 After receiving the parties’ settlement statements, the
Court may make ex parte settlement calls to counsel to discuss settlement.
2 Videos and other digital media files may be submitted using the following link:
https://evidence.nyed.uscourts.gov/.
7
Other judges in E.D.N.Y.
- Carol Bagley Amon
- Joan M. Azrack
- Frederic Block
- Margo K. Brodie
- Gary R. Brown
- Sanket J. Bulsara
- Pamela K. Chen
- James R. Cho
- Nusrat J. Choudhury
- Brian M. Cogan
- Peggy Cross-Goldenberg
- Raymond J. Dearie
- Ann M. Donnelly
- Lee G. Dunst
- Seth D. Eichenholtz
- Lara K. Eshkenazi
- Nicholas G. Garaufis
- Nina Gershon
- I. Leo Glasser
- LaShann DeArcy Hall
- Marcia M. Henry
- Peggy Kuo
- Robert M. Levy
- Arlene R. Lindsay
- Steven I. Locke
- Joseph A. Marutollo
- Taryn A. Merkl
- Vera M. Scanlon
- Anne Y. Shields
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Clay H. Kaminsky.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.