Hon. Seth D. Eichenholtz — Individual Rules of Practice
E.D.N.Y.
Courtroom: 324N
What Seth D. Eichenholtz's rules say, in the court's own words
Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.
How much notice is required to adjourn?
2
“(not a “Letter”) at least two (2) business days prior to the scheduled appearance or deadline.”
Which courtroom hears this part?
324N
“Courtroom: 324N / Chambers: 304N”
What is the part's e-mail address?
Eichenholtz_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov
“Email: Eichenholtz_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov”
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES AND RULES OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SETH D. EICHENHOLTZ
United States District Court
Eastern District of New York
225 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, New York 11201
Courtroom: 324N / Chambers: 304N
Telephone: 718-510-9710 (Chambers)
Email: Eichenholtz_Chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov
Courtroom DUeppduattye: dD Niaonvae Cmabgegria 3n,o 2 (072158 -510-9714)
Pro se
Unless otherwise ordered pbryo tshee Court, matters before Judge Eichenholtz will be
conducted purs uant to the following practices and rules. litigants and attorneys
representing parties in cases with litigants should review the Court’s specific practices
fIo. r thosCe O c N a S s E e N s T . ING TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION
Should the parties consent to the jurisdiction of Judge Eichenholtz for all purposes, the
pIIa. rties Cs O h M al M l p UN ro IC m AT p I t O ly N S fi W le I t T h H e C N H o A t M ic B e E o R f S Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.
A. Electronic Case Filing (ECF)
Except as provided below, parties must use the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system to
1
cwomhemnu fniilcinatge a w liethtt tehre a Csokuinrtg. t Ahtet oCronueryts two itlla rkeec eainv ea nctoitoifnic, athtiiosn i os ft aylpl iccoaulrlyt o“rmdoertsio tnh”r oaungdh nthoet
“ElCeFtt seyrs”t eomr . “ sWtahteuns firleinpgo artn”y document via ECF, parties must use the appropriate event type
(
) and a brief description of the document. Unless specifically
directed otherwise, parties should not provide courtesy copies of documents filed by ECF to
Ch ambers.
B. Telephone Calls
Parties may contact Chambers by telephone only as permitted in these rules, as
instructed by the Court, or in emergency situations requiring immediate attention. Parties may
contact the Courtroom Deputy with questions about scheduling matters by telephone, but all
adjournment requests must be filed on ECF as set forth in Section III.
1
1
Parties are advised to contact the ECF help desk for any ECF-related questions.
C. E-Mail
E-mail messages to Chambers are not permitted, except as specified in these rules or as
instructed by the Court. Parties with urgent issues should contact the Chambers by teleexp hpoanrtee,
not by e-mail. When authorized, e-mails should be sent to
Eichenholtz_chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov. Unless the e-mail contains an authorized
su bmission, parties should copy all parties’ counsel when sending an e-mail to Chambers.
D. Required Notification to Chambers
All parties shall immediately notify Chambers by telephone or e-mail if (1) any party has
reason to believe that there may be grounds that Judge Eichenholtz should be recused from a
pending matter or (2) where a case has settled, when unable to promptly notify the Court by
IEICI.F . REQUESTS FOR ADJOURNMENTS OR, EXTENSIONS OF TIME
A. Timing
2
All requests for adjournments or extensions of time shall be filed on ECF as a “Motion”
(not a “Letter”) at least two (2) business days prior to the scheduled appearance or deadline.
Parties who do not meet this deadline must provide a good faith basis for the late request and
must notify Chambers by telephone about the filing of a late request.
B. Required Contents
Any adjournment or extension request must include the following information: (1) the
appearance date or deadline you wish to adjourn or extend; (2) the number of previous
requests for adjournment or extension (by any party); (3) whether those previous requests
were granted or denied; (4) whether the other party or parties consent (including any reasons
given for withholding consent); and (5) whether the request affects any other scheduled Court
appearance or deadline. Parties seeking an adjournment of a case management deadline should
propose a revised schedule addressing all deadlines impacted by the extension. Parties seeking
the adjournment of a conference should propose at least three new dates for the conference
when all parties are available.
2
Any request to convert an in-person conference to a virtual (telephone or video)
conference is considered a request to adjourn. Because the Court is intentional in the format it
selects for conferences, the request must contain good cause for the change in format and
c omply with the requirements in III.A and B, including that the request be filed at least two (2)
business days prior to the conference. 2
C. Effect of Filing
The filing of an adjournment or extension request does not stay existing deadlines and
conference dates. Unless the Court grants an adjournment or extension, parties must adhere to
all existing conference dates and scheduling deadlines. In the event a deadline is approaching,
a party may contact Chambers by telephone to advise the Court of the urgency of addressing
IthVe. adjoAu
P
r
P
n
E
m
AR
e
A
n
N
t
C
o
E
r
S
extension request.
A. Appearances of Counsel
Any attorney appearing before the Court must first enter a notice of appearance on ECF
prior to their first appearance. Counsel shall appear promptly for all conferences. When
appearing, counsel must be fully familiar with the case and authorized to discuss (1) the parties’
progress in the case; (2) scheduling of further proceedings; and (3) the possibility of settlement
and status of any settlement discussions. Counsel must also be familiar with all orders and rules
related to the conference. The Court may consider a party failing to appear if the counsel
represen ting the party does not meet criteria set forth in this section.
B. Participation of Junior Attorneys and Law Students
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York is a teaching court,
and the Court encourages opportunities for junior attorneys and law students to appear and
participate in proceedings. The Court will permit multiple attorneys to appear for a party if this
creates an opportunity for junior attorneys to participate. The Court will also grant leave in
appropriate cases for law students to participate under the supervision of an admitted attorney.
The Court recognizes that the decision of who conducts each proceeding is with the lawyer in
cVh. arge Io N f I e T a IA c L h C c O a N se FE , a R n EN d C , E u S lt I i N m Ca I t V e I l L y C, t A h S e E S r epresented party.
A. Parties’ Rule 26(f) Conference
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), the parties must meet and confer at least one week prior
to the Initial Conference to discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses, the parties’
position o n settlement, and a proposed discovery plan.
B. Parties’ Proposed Discovery Plan
At least seven (7) days before the Initial Conference the parties must file on ECF a joint
proposed discovery plan using the model provided by the Court. In the event the parties are
unable to reach agreement on any of the deadlines in the proposed discovery plan, the parties
should note any areas of disagreement in the joint submission.
3
C. Discovery Exchanges Prior to the Conference
Prior to the initial conference, the parties are required to exchange Rule 26 initial
disclosures and are strongly encouraged to exchange initial sets of interrogatories, requests for
production of documents, and, when applicable, releases for relevant records. Making these
exchanges ahead of the conference will make the initial conference more productive. If the
parties are unable to make these initial exchanges prior to the conference, they should come to
the conference prepared to discuss why they could not make these exchanges ahead of the
VcoIn. fereCn I c V e IL . D ISCOVERY PRACTICES
A. Parties to Conduct Discovery
Parties are expected to conduct discovery on their own in good faith and within the
scheduling deadlines set by the Court. Parties shoSueled not file discovery requests and responses
with the Court. When a dispute arises, the parties must first try to resolve it themselves and in
good faith before seeking judicial intervention. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1); Local Civil Rules
26.4 and 37.2. Once those efforts are exhausted, parties should raise disputes as instructed
below.
B. Discovery Disputes During Ongoing Depositions
In the event the parties are unable to resolve a dispute during an ongoing deposition, the
parties are directed to contact Chambers by telephone with all parties on the line. The Court
will either resolve the matter or instruct the parties on how to proceed. If the Court is not
immediately available to address the dispute, the parties should continue the deposition to the
extent possible while waiting for the Court’s response. Under no circumstances should the
parties discontinue the deposition without contacting the Court.
C. All Other Discovery Disputes
For all other discovery disputes requiring judicial intervention, the parties must file a
single letter, jointly composed. The letter should be filed on ECF using the “motion” event,
describing the motion as seeking a discovery conference. If a party is raising a dispute as part
of a status report to the Court, they should file the status report as a “motion” and not as a
“status report.” The letter must describe (1) the nature of the dispute; (2) each party’s position
regarding the facts and law surrounding the dispute; and (3) a description of the parties’ efforts
to resolve the dispute in good faith prior to filing the motion. Each party’s portion of the joint
submission shall be limited to three pages (up to six total pages in the joint letter). To the extent
the parties need to file discovery requests and responses as exhibits to their letter, they must
file only those requests and responses relevant to the motion. Unless the Court can resolve the
matter based on the letter, the Court will schedule a conference to discuss the dispute and/or
set a scheduling order so that the parties can brief a motion to compel or for a protective
order. Absent unforeseen circumstances, applications to compel discovery made later than
thirty (30) days prior to the close of discovery will be considered untimely.
4
D. Confidentiality Orders
Judge Eichenholtz uses a form confidentiality order that the parties may submit to the
Court for approval to protect the confidentiality of information exchanged in discovery in
appropriate circumstances. The form order is available on the Court’s website. If the parties
consent to the form order, they should file the proposed order signed by the parties via ECF as
a “consent motion,” along with a cover letter detailing the kinds of information that will be
subject to the order and asking the Court to endorse the stipulation.
If any party seeks to change the language of the form order, the party proposing the
changes must submit (1) a letter explaining the basis for the proposed changes and setting forth
the parties’ positions on those changes; (2) a redlined version of the confidentiality order
identifying the proposed changes; and (3) a clean version of the proposed confidentiality order.
That party should also send a copy of the proposed order to Chambers
(VEIiIc. henSh
E
o
T
l
T
tz
L
_
E
c
M
h
E
a
N
m
T
bers@nyed.uscourts.gov) in Microsoft Word format.
A. Settlement Discussions
The parties are expected to discuss the possibility of settlement at every stage of
litigation. The Court encourages the parties to exchange demands and offers as early as their
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) discovery planning conference. The Court expects that the parties will be
prepared to address the possibility of settlement at every appearance, including the initial
conferenc e.
B. Settlement Conferences
The Court will hold a settlement conference at a point in the litigation when it would be
productive to do so. The purpose of a settlement conference is to try to resolve the
case. Attorneys who appear must be authorized to enter into a settlement on the record on
behalf of a party. Client(s) are expected to attend the conference in person, unless the Court
specifies otherwise.
To be fully prepared for the conference, the Court requires the following ahead of the
conference:
1. At least fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Conference, Plaintiff’s
counsel shall submit a settlement demand to Defendant’s counsel with a
brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. No later than
seven (7) days prior to the settlement conference, Defendant’s counsel
shall submit an offer to Plaintiff’s counsel with a brief explanation of why
such a settlement is appropriate. If there is a dispute between co-
Defendants represented by different counsel about contribution to a
settlement, the counsel for each Defendant should submit to counsel for
the other Defendant(s) a brief letter stating that party’s position on
5
contribution.
ex parte
2. At least five (5) business days prior to the Settleemxe npt aCroten ference, the
parties shall submit settlement letters to Chambers by email to
Eichenholtz_chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov. The settlement
letters should include the following: (a) the demand(s) and offer(s)
exchanged thus far; (b) the strengths and weakness of the party’s case; (c)
any legal arguments in support of their settlement position and valuation
of the case with citations to relevant authorities (including relevant
verdicts, decisions, and settlements); (d) what, in the party’s view, are the
obstacles to resolving the case; and (e) any additional information that the
party believes will be helpful to the Court in trying to resolve the case,
which emx upsatr itneclude any special terms the party is requesting as part of a
final settlement agreement (confidentiality, indemnification, etc.). As
these statements will be treated as confidexe nptaiartl eand will not be
docketed, they should include a realistic valuation of the case and
assessment of the party’s settlement position. The letters shall be
limited to five (5) pages exclusive of attachments.
3. Counsel should anticipate that the Court may contact counsel for each
party individually ahead of the conference to discuss that party’s
settlement position.
C. Advising the Court of a Settlement in Principle
When the parties have reached an agreement in principle on the settlement of a case, the
parties should promptly file a letter by ECF indicating that they have reached a settlement in
principle. If, for some reason, the parties cannot promptly file a letter by ECF, they should
immediately call or e-mail Chambers to advise of the settlement. Unless the Court enters an
Order otherwise, the parties should file within seven (7) days of a settlement in principle a
VstIiIpIu. latNio
O
n
N
-oDf
I
d
S
i
P
s
O
m
SI
i
T
ss
IV
a
E
l oMr
O
a
T
s
IO
ta
N
t
S
u s letter proposing a date to file the stipulation of dismissal.
Unless otherwise directed by the presiding District Judge, all non-dispositive pre-trial
motions, inclaudd ihnogc dviiscceovery motions, are to be made to Judge Eichenholtz. For discovery
motions, follow the process described in Local Civil Rule 37.2 and Section VI of these Rules. For
motions for admissions or attorney withdrawals, follow the relevant Local Civil
Rules. For all other non-dispositive motions, after first exhausting good faith efforts to resolve
the dispute, a party should file a letter motion when permitted under Local Civil Rule 7.1(e) or,
alternatively, request a conference about the dispute in anticipation of filing a motion. In
certain cases, after submission of the initial letter motion, the Court may order the moving party
to file a formal motion, in which case the parties should follow the requirements for formal
briefing of motions in Local Civil Rules 6.1 and 7.1.
6
IX. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
Dispositive motions, such as motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment,
must be made to the presiding District Judge in accordance with his or her Individual Practices
and Rules, unless the parties have consented to Judge Eichenholtz in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c)(1).
W here the parties have cons ented to Judge Eichenholtz, the following rules apply:
A. Pre-Motion Conferences
1. Pre-motion conferences are not required in Social Security appeals or
habeas cases. In all other cases, a party must request a pre-motion
conference before filing any dispositive motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
12 or 56; any motion for a change of venue; or a motion to amend a
3
pleading pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 when leave of court is required.
2. To request a pre-motion conference, the moving party is to file and serve
a pre-motion conference letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, setting forth
4
the basis for the anticipated motion. The letter shall include citations to
relevant authority and should provide a brief overview of the anticipated
motion. A party’s submission of a pre-motion letter seeking leave to file a
pre-answer motion to dismiss will stay that party’s obligation to answer
or move against the complaint through the date of the pre-motion
conference.
3. All parties served with the moving party’s pre-motion conference letter
are required to serve and file a letter response within five (5) business
days of service of the moving party’s letter, unless otherwise ordered by
5
the Court. The response shall not exceed three (3) pages. When a party
responds to a pre-motion conference letter in anticipation of a motion to
dismiss, they should state whether they intend to: file an amended
complaint as of right, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1)(B); seek
leave to amend in light of one or more alleged pleading defects; or proceed
to briefing on the contemplated motion. Replies are not permitted.
3
When submitting a pre-motion letter regarding a request to amend a pleading, the moving
party must comply with Local Civil Rule 15.1.
4
If the pre-motion conference letter is filed in anticipation of a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
56, the party does not need to file a full statement of facts on a motion for summary judgment (a Local
Civil Rule 56.1 Statement) at the time of the pre-motion conference letter, but the letter must describe
the general undisputed material facts that will support the motion.
5
Any letter in response from a party opposing an anticipated motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
56 must include a description of the dispute(s) of fact that will serve as a basis for opposing summary
judgment and the admissible evidence that supports the dispute.
7
4. In appropriate cases, the Court may construe the pre-motion conference
letter, along with counsel’s arguments at the pre-motion conference, as
the motion itself. The Court may also set a briefing schedule without a
pre-motion conference if the Court determines that a pre-motion
conference will not be a useful expenditure of the parties’ time.
5. If any party concludes in good faith that delaying the filing of a motion, in
order to comply with any aspect of these Individual Practices and Rules,
will deprive the party of a substantive right (e.g. the timing provisions of
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A)), the party may file the motion within the time
required by the Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure, together
with an explanation of the basis for that conclusion.
B. Motion Papers
1. Motion papers shall be filed promptly at the time of service. Parties should
not hold motion papers until all papers are complete. The Court does not
follow a “bundling rule.”
2. Please follow Local Civil Rule 7.1(b) regarding formatting of memoranda
and Local Civil Rule 7.1(c) regarding length of memoranda. Counsel should
note that the rule now provides a word limit (as opposed to a page limit)
in most cases and requires a certification of the word count. All
X. PRE-TRIAL SUB m M e I m SS o IO r N a S n d a must be filed in a text-searchable format.
The parties must file a joint proposed pre-trial order in the format prescribed by the
presiding District Judge on or before the deadline set by the Court or as set forth in the presiding
District Judge’s Individual Practices and Rules.
Where the parties have consented to Judge Eichenholtz for trial, the following rules
apply:
A. Joint Proposed Pre-Trial Orders
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, within sixty (60) days from the date for
the completion of discovery in a civil case, the parties shall submit to the Court a
joint proposed pre-trial order that includes the following:
1. The full caption of the action;
2. The names, addresses (including firm names), telephone number, and
email addresses of trial counsel;
8
3. A brief statement by Plaintiff as to the basis of subject-matter jurisdiction,
and a brief statement by Defendant as to the presence or absence of
subject-matter jurisdiction, each of which shall include citations to all
authority relied on and relevant facts as to citizenship and jurisdictional
amount;
4. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that the party
has asserted that remain to be tried—without recital of evidentiary
matters but with citations to all statutes on which the party has relied—
and of the claims and defenses that the party has previously asserted that
are not to be tried;
5. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or
without a jury, and the number of trial days needed;
6. Any stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law that have been agreed
to by all parties;
7. A statement by each party as to the witnesses whose testimony is to be
offered in the party’s case-in-chief, indicating whether such witnesses will
testify in person or by deposition. The statement should also include a
brief narrative of the expected testimony for each witness. Only listed
witnesses will be permitted to testify except when prompt notice has been
given and good cause shown;
8. A designation by each party of those portions of any deposition testimony
to be offered in its case-in-chief, with any cross-designations and
objections by any other party;
9. A table by each party of exhibits to be offered in the partey.g’s. case-in-chief,
with an indication as to whether any party objects to any such exhibits and
a brief statement of the nature of the objection ( , “relevance,”
“authenticity,” “hearsay”), and a brief response to those objections. The
taEbxlhe ifboirtm at below Dsheosucrldip bteio fnol lowOebdj:e ction(s) Brief response
to the
Objection(s)
All exhibits must be pre-marked in the order in which they are expected
to be used (using numerals for Plaintiff’s exhibits and letters for
Defendant’s exhibits). Parties are expected to resolve before trial all
issues of authenticity or chain of custody. Only exhibits listed will be
received in evidence, except for good cause shown.
9
B. Filings Prior to Trial
in limine
1. All motions addressing any evidentiary or other issues that should be
resolved shall be filed at least fifteen (15) days before the trial
unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Parties must provide the Court
with copies of any disputed documents as exhibits to the motion.
Responses, if any, shall be due five (5) days later. Oral argument will be
scheduled if necessary. voir dire
2. For jury trials, proposed jury instructions, questions, and a jury
verdict sheet shall be filed at least ten (10) days prior to the start of the
trial unless otherwise ordered by the Court. These pre-trial submissions
should also be sent to Chambers via email
(Eichenholtz_chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov) in Microsoft Word format.
Pretrial memoranda are not required for jury trials, but a party may
submit one along with these other filings if a party believes it would be
useful.
3. For non-jury trials, if the Court requests a pretrial memorandum, it shall
be filed at least ten (10) days prior to the start of the trial. The
memorandum should describe the facts the party intends to establish and
the application of those facts to the relevant law. Parties need not put
citations to evidence in a pre-trial memorandum.
C. Courtesy Copies of Trial Exhibits
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, each party shall provide the Court with three
binders of their pre-marked exhibits with tabs reflecting each exhibit’s corresponding number
or letter. The parties shall bring their binders to the final pre-trial conference. All exhibits,
i ncluding demonstrative exhibits, should be exchanged with the opposing party prior to
s ubmitting the courtesy copy binder to the Court
10
Other judges in E.D.N.Y.
- Carol Bagley Amon
- Joan M. Azrack
- Frederic Block
- Margo K. Brodie
- Gary R. Brown
- Sanket J. Bulsara
- Pamela K. Chen
- James R. Cho
- Nusrat J. Choudhury
- Brian M. Cogan
- Peggy Cross-Goldenberg
- Raymond J. Dearie
- Ann M. Donnelly
- Lee G. Dunst
- Lara K. Eshkenazi
- Nicholas G. Garaufis
- Nina Gershon
- I. Leo Glasser
- LaShann DeArcy Hall
- Marcia M. Henry
- Clay H. Kaminsky
- Peggy Kuo
- Robert M. Levy
- Arlene R. Lindsay
- Steven I. Locke
- Joseph A. Marutollo
- Taryn A. Merkl
- Vera M. Scanlon
- Anne Y. Shields
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Seth D. Eichenholtz.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.