Hon. Raymond P. Fernandez — Part IA-35 Rules

Bronx County Supreme Court Civil Term

Courtroom: 625 · Appearance: Virtual

What Raymond P. Fernandez's rules say, in the court's own words

Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.

Must I appear in person, or may I appear virtually?

Virtual

“Preliminary Conferences (Virtual via Microsoft Teams)”

Which courtroom hears this part?

625

“Courtroom 625”

Who is the principal law clerk?

Taebryanna Sims, Esq., Associate

“Srabone Monir, Esq., Principal Law Clerk Taebryanna Sims, Esq., Associate Law Clerk”

Full published rules for part ia-35 rules

STATE OF NEW YORK

UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM

TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

SUPREME COURT, CIVIL DIVISION

851 GRAND CONCOURSE

BRONX, NEW YORK 10451

HON. RAYMOND P. FERNANDEZ

Acting Justice of the Supreme Court

PART 35 RULES

Courtroom 625

718-618-1216

BxSupCiv-IA35@nycourts.gov

Srabone Monir, Esq., Principal Law Clerk

Taebryanna Sims, Esq., Associate Law Clerk

Jason C. Wright, Senior Court Clerk

1. Communications

All inquires concerning scheduling, appearances, adjournments, and case status shall be

directed to the Part Clerk (BxSupCiv-IA35@nycourts.gov). Parties may not telephone

chambers.

2. Conferences

Parties may not unilaterally stipulate to adjourn any conference, and failure to

appear will result in default (22 NYCRR 202.27). Defaults will only be vacated on

motion. The Court will not entertain any stipulations or correspondence related to

vacating a default for failure to appear. Counsel are reminded to keep current their

NYSCEF appearances and email addresses.

a. Preliminary Conferences (Virtual via Microsoft Teams)

Upon filing the Request for Judicial Intervention and a Request for a Preliminary

Conference, a Preliminary Conference will automatically be scheduled. Preliminary

Conferences are conducted virtually via Microsoft Teams unless the Court directs

otherwise. A link will be sent to all parties having associated an email address with the

action on NYSCEF. A Case Scheduling Order (“CSO”) will be generated at the

conference. Parties shall strictly comply with discovery obligations by the dates set forth

in the CSO (22 NYCRR 202.20-e). Extensions of deadlines set forth in the CSO must be

requested at a compliance conference and will only granted upon a showing of good

cause. If 45 days have elapsed and a PC has not been scheduled, contact BxSupCiv-

IA35@nycourts.gov

b. Compliance Conferences (Virtual via Microsoft Teams)

The Case Scheduling Order will provide an initial compliance conference date.

Thereafter, any party may request a compliance conference by writing to

BxSupCiv-IA35@nycourts.gov. Compliance conferences are conducted virtually

via Microsoft Teams unless the Court directs otherwise. Counsel for all parties

shall consult prior to the conference (22 NYCRR 202.11). The link will be sent to

all email addresses associated with the action on NYSCEF.

c. Oral Argument (In-Person)

All motions, except those brought by order to show cause, are accepted on

submission unless oral argument is requested by a letter accompanying the motion

papers (22 NYCRR 202.8-f [b]), or if the Court so directs argument to be held. Oral

argument is strictly in-person.

d. Orders to Show Cause (In-Person)

Parties are referred to 22 NYCRR 202.8-d, which provides:

“Motions shall be brought on by order to show cause only when

there is genuine urgency (e.g., applications for provisional relief),

a stay is required or a statute mandates so proceeding. See Section

202.8-e. Absent advance permission of the court, reply papers

shall not be submitted on orders to show cause.”

Whereas orders to show cause are urgent in nature, no adjournments will be

granted. Orders to show cause require strict adherence to their terms; failure to

effect service in the manner provided for will result in denial.

e. Pre-Trial/Settlement Conferences (In-Person)

Pre-trial conferences will automatically be scheduled 60 days after the filing of the

Note of Issue. All pre-trial conferences are held in-person and are handled by the

Court as a settlement conference. Cases will not be released to the Trial

Assignment Part (“TAP”) without earnest discussions of settlement. Where a

matter appears to not be ready for trial, the Note of Issue will be stricken sua sponte

if there is a misstatement in the certificate of readiness (e.g., the parties are still

engaged in discovery).

All attorneys appearing before the Court must be fully familiar with the facts and

issues involved in the action and have full authority to enter into a binding

stipulation of settlement on behalf of their client(s). Counsel should also know the

status and amounts of any liens and/or litigation funding agreements.

The Court has broad discretion to order the immediate trial of any post-note of issue

case assigned to it and will exercise this discretion where parties do not participate

in settlement talks in good faith.

f. Mediation (In-Person)

At any time during the pendency of an action, any party may request mediation with the

Court by emailing BxSupCiv-IA35@nycourts.gov if all parties mutually agree that it may

help effectuate a settlement. Mediation requires consent of all parties to be an

effective use of the Court’s resources.

All attorneys appearing at mediation must be fully familiar with the facts and issues

involved in the action and have full authority to enter into a binding stipulation of

settlement on behalf of their client(s). Counsel should also know the status and amounts

of any liens and/or litigation funding agreements.

Clients and/or claims representatives are encouraged to attend in-person, but at minimum

shall be available by phone at the time of the mediation.

The Court will allocate a minimum of one hour to mediation, but will not exceed three

hours except in rare, complex cases.

3. Motions

All motions shall be filed exclusively via NYSCEF and no working copies will be

accepted.

a. Discovery Motions

To the maximum extent possible, discovery disputes should be resolved through informal

procedures, such as conferences, as opposed to motion practice (22 NYCRR 202.20-f

[a]). Parties shall seek a conference with the Court BEFORE the filing of any

discovery-related motion (BxSupCiv-IA35@nycourts.gov). Where motion practice

cannot be avoided, parties are reminded:

• Discovery-related motions made prior to the CSO being issued will be denied (22

NYCRR 202.8[f]).

• The Court requires strict adherence to 22 NYCRR §§ 202.7(a)(2), and 202.20-f.

Section 202.20-f provides, in pertinent part:

“In the event that a discovery dispute cannot be resolved other than through

motion practice, each such discovery motion shall be supported by an

affidavit or affirmation from counsel attesting to counsel having conducted an

in-person or telephonic conference, setting forth the date and time of such

conference, persons participating, and the length of time of the conference”

Failure to adhere to either section will result in denial of the motion, without prejudice to

renew on proper papers.

b. Summary Judgment Motions

All motions for summary judgment must be filed no later than 60 days following the

filing of the Note of Issue. The Court does not require submission of a Statement of

Material Facts.

4. Note of Issue

Leave is not required to file the Note of Issue. However, parties are reminded that

filing the Note of Issue and accompanying certificate of readiness certifies that all

discovery is completed, waived, or not required and that the action is ready for trial (22

NYCRR 202.21[b]).

After the passage of 20 days, the Court will entertain a motion to vacate the Note of Issue

only "[w]here unusual or unanticipated circumstances develop subsequent to the filing of

a note of issue and certificate of readiness" that would otherwise cause "substantial

prejudice" (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]).

5. Infant Compromise Orders

An Infant Compromise Order (ICO) is required to settle or otherwise discontinue the

claims of an infant plaintiff. ICO applications are governed by CPLR §§ 1207 and 1208,

Judiciary Law § 474, and Uniform Rule 202.67. If an ICO application does not strictly

comply with the requirements set forth in these provisions, approval of the ICO will be

delayed until full compliance is reached through additional or amended submissions.

Parties will be advised of the hearing date by Chambers Staff or the Part Clerk.

The infant’s appearance will not be waived. Plaintiff’s counsel must make all

arrangements to have the infant and parent/natural guardian appear. ICO hearings are in-

person absent exigent circumstances. Proof of identity of the guardian appearing at the

hearing must be furnished to the Court on the date of the hearing.

If an ICO hearing has not been scheduled within 60 days from submission, contact

BxSupCiv-IA35@nycourts.gov

6. Trials

Trials are assigned to Part 35 under the direction of the Trial Assignment Part (TAP).

When TAP assigns a trial to Part 35, it does so by order that the parties and their

witnesses are ready for trial from the time of assignment through the conclusion of the

trial. Thus, the Court will not entertain applications for adjournment once TAP has

made the assignment. Accordingly, all attorneys, parties, and witnesses shall be ready to

proceed with trial on the assignment date and to continue day-to-day until verdict.

Upon the date of assignment, the parties shall furnish:

• A list of proposed witnesses, including the need for any interpreters, with the

required language and dialect.

• All marked pleadings and bills of particulars.

• Two business cards from each attorney with cell phone numbers.

• All in limine motions. Motions in limine must be presented in writing.

• Any motion or application must include citations to relevant authority.

• After jury selection, parties shall have the court stenographer pre-mark all exhibits

for identification (or evidence if without objection) and furnish an exhibit list.

Trials are held every day except Monday. The Court will set a date certain for the

submission of proposed verdict sheets and requests to charge.

These Rules remain in effect until further notice.

Revised June 2024

Updated by the court: not stated on the court's page
Checked by us: Oct. 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m.

Other judges in Bronx

Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Raymond P. Fernandez.

Compare across judges