Hon. Cathy Seibel — Individual Rules of Practice
S.D.N.Y.
This judge's published rules are on file below; no quick-answer fields have been extracted yet.
What Cathy Seibel's rules say, in the court's own words
Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.
How much notice is required to adjourn?
3
“of a court appearance, absent an emergency the request must be made at least three (3) business days prior to the scheduled appearance. Requests for”
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
September 15, 2026
INDIVIDUAL RULES OF PRACTICE OF JUDGE CATHY SEIBEL
Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Seibel, matters before Judge Seibel shall be conducted in
accordance with the following procedures:
1. Communications with Chambers
A. Letters. Except as otherwise provided below, communications with chambers
shall be by letter, with copies simultaneously delivered to all counsel. Unless
there is a request to file a letter under seal or a letter contains sensitive or
confidential information or the party does not have access to the Electronic Case
Filing (ECF) system, letters must be filed electronically on the ECF system (with
a courtesy copy emailed to the chambers email address,
chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov, as described below). If one of the
exceptions described in the previous sentence applies, a PDF version of a letter
may be emailed to the chambers email address or delivered in hard copy. If a
letter is filed electronically on ECF, a PDF of the filed version of that letter must
also be e-mailed to chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov. Failure to email a
PDF courtesy copy may mean that the letter does not come to the Court’s
attention in a timely manner. Letters solely between parties or their counsel or
otherwise not addressed to the Court may not be filed on ECF or otherwise sent to
the Court. Letter-motions may be made via ECF if they comply with the
S.D.N.Y. Local Rules and the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and
Instructions. Parties may not communicate with chambers directly by email.
Email is to be used only to submit courtesy copies of letters filed on ECF or to
submit a PDF of a letter if one of the exceptions set forth in the second sentence
above applies or as permitted in section 1.B. below. If a party believes an
exception to this rule is warranted, it must obtain permission from chambers
before using email other than as outlined above.
B. Urgent Communications. Telephone calls to chambers are permitted only in
situations requiring immediate attention. In such situations, email the chambers
email box to request the phone number, and place “URGENT” in the subject line
of the email. If an ECF submission requires immediate attention, the filing party
should email courtesy copies of the filing and place “URGENT” in the subject
line.
C. Docketing, Scheduling, and Calendar Matters. Please contact Courtroom
Deputy Clerk Walter Clark at walter_clark@nysd.uscourts.gov between 9 am and
5 pm.
D. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for
adjournments or extensions of time shall be by letter and must (unless to be sealed
or containing sensitive/confidential information or the party lacks access to the
ECF system) be filed on ECF as letter-motions, with a PDF courtesy copy to
chambers as described in item 1.A above. All requests for adjournment or
extensions must state (1) the original date, (2) the number of previous requests for
adjournment or extension, and the reason for those requests, (3) whether these
previous requests were granted or denied, (4) the reason for the instant request,
and (5) whether the adversary consents, and, if not, the reasons given by the
adversary for refusing to consent. If the requested adjournment or extension
affects any other scheduled dates, a proposed Revised Scheduling Order (with
deadlines falling only on business days) must be attached. Absent extraordinary
circumstances, requests for extensions will be denied if not made promptly and
before the expiration of the original deadline. If the request is for an adjournment
of a court appearance, absent an emergency the request must be made at least
three (3) business days prior to the scheduled appearance. Requests for
extensions of deadlines regarding a matter that has been referred to a Magistrate
Judge must be directed to that Magistrate Judge.
E. Courtesy Copies. As noted in item 1.A above, if a letter is filed electronically
on ECF, a PDF file of that letter must also be e-mailed to
chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov. The courtesy copy of any letter filed on
ECF must be a copy of the filed version of the letter and must include the
automatically generated ECF header (that is, the text – e.g., “Case 7:24-cv-1234-
CS Document 100 Filed 7/1/24 Page 1 of 1” – appearing at the top of each page
of the document on the ECF system). One (1) courtesy hard copy of all
pleadings, motion papers (with the exception of motions for admission pro hac
vice) and other documents (aside from letters) filed via ECF shall be submitted to
chambers at the time the papers are served. See section 2.B below regarding
motion papers. If hand-delivered, courtesy copies should be brought to the
Clerk’s Office on the first floor of the Courthouse, not to chambers.
F. Pro Se Parties. Pro se (unrepresented) parties are encouraged to consent to
electronic service (via the Consent to Electronic Service form available on the
Court’s website). Unless the Court grants permission to file documents
electronically, all communications with the Court by a pro se party must be
emailed to ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov or delivered or mailed to:
Pro Se Intake Unit Pro Se Intake Unit
Charles L. Brieant U.S. Courthouse or U.S. Courthouse
300 Quarropas Street 500 Pearl Street (Room 205)
White Plains, NY 10601 New York, NY 10007
Pro se parties using the ProSe email box will receive an auto-generated message
confirming receipt of their email, but that does not mean that the document has
been filed on the docket. The filing party must check the docket to see if the
document has been filed and may contact the Pro Se Intake Unit at 212-805-0175
for assistance if the document has not been docketed after two business days.
2
Except as set forth in items 1.A and 1.B above, parties may not communicate
directly with chambers by email.
Pro se parties are advised that there is a Pro Se Law Clinic available to assist self-
represented parties in civil cases. The Clinic may be able to provide a pro se party
with advice in connection with their case. The Pro Se Law Clinic is run by a
private organization called the City Bar Justice Center; it is not part of, or run by,
the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of
the Court, which must still be made by any self-represented party through the Pro
Se Intake Unit or the pro se email box). Litigants in need of legal assistance
should complete the City Bar Justice Center’s intake form to make an
appointment. If a litigant has questions about the intake form or needs to highlight
an urgent deadline already disclosed in the form, the clinic can be contacted by
phone (212-382-4794) or email (fedprosdny@nycbar.org). In-person
appointments at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in Manhattan and the Charles
L. Brieant Jr. Courthouse in White Plains, or remote appointments, are available.
2. Motions in Civil Cases
A. Pre-Motion Conference in Civil Cases.
For discovery motions, follow Local Civil Rule 37.2, requiring the moving party
to request an informal conference with the Court before the filing of any such
motion. Strict adherence to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) – the “meet and confer” rule
– is required. The parties should be prepared to describe the time, place and
duration of the meeting, and to identify the counsel involved.
A pre-motion conference with the Court is required before making any other
motion, except motions for admission pro hac vice, motions for reargument or
reconsideration, motions for temporary restraining orders or preliminary
injunctions, motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2), or motions for which the
Court has already set a briefing schedule. To arrange a pre-motion conference,
the moving party must submit a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, setting forth
the basis for the anticipated motion. The Court will then set the date for the pre-
motion conference, and at least one week before that conference , the opposing
party must submit a letter, also not to exceed three (3) pages, setting forth its
position – unless the Court has already set a schedule for pre-motion letters, in
which case that schedule should be followed. If a pre-motion conference is
requested in connection with a proposed motion to dismiss, the request will stay
the deadline for the requesting party to move or answer, and a new deadline will
be set at the conference or after the motion is decided. A party need not comply
with the pre-motion conference requirement where it reasonably believes that
3
delay in filing might result in the loss of a right. In that event, the party should
file, along with the motion, a letter explaining why the party believes it might be
prejudiced if it complied with the pre-motion conference requirement.
B. Motion Papers.
i. Unless prior permission has been granted – and except for motions to
reconsider, which are governed by Local Rule 6.3 – memoranda of law in
support of and in opposition to motions are limited to 8750 words, and
reply memoranda are limited to 3500, in accordance with Local Rule 7.1.
Memoranda of ten (10) pages or more shall contain a table of contents and
table of authorities. All memoranda of law must be double-spaced and
shall be in 12-point font or larger, with one-inch (1") margins on all sides.
Footnotes may be single-spaced but must also be in 12-point font or
larger. Sur-reply memoranda will not be accepted unless the Court’s prior
permission has been obtained. Memoranda must be text-searchable when
filed electronically on ECF.
ii. All courtesy copies submitted in connection with motions must be bound
in any manner that is secure, does not obscure the text, and permits the
document to lie reasonably flat when open. Parties should submit multiple
volumes rather than large documents that do not lie reasonably flat when
open. Preferred forms of binding are three-ring binders and spiral binding.
Paper-and-plastic binding is acceptable as long as the pages will lay flat.
Metal prong fasteners are not acceptable.
iii. All courtesy copies must include the automatically generated ECF header
(that is, the text – e.g., “Case 7:24-cv-1234-CS Document 100 Filed
7/1/24 Page 1 of 1” – appearing at the top of each page of the document on
the ECF system), unless the papers have not yet been filed on the docket.
C. Special Rules for Summary Judgment Motions
i. Except in pro se cases where the moving or non-moving party does not
have access to word processing, the moving party shall provide all other
parties with an electronic copy of the moving party’s Statement of
Material Facts Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1. The opposing party
must reproduce each entry in the moving party’s Rule 56.1 Statement, and
set out the opposing party’s response directly beneath it.
ii. The moving party’s Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Civil
Rule 56.1 may not exceed 25 double-spaced pages without prior
permission of the Court.
4
iii. Any deposition that is filed, whether in whole or in part, must be text-
searchable.
iv. Exhibits should always be separated by protruding tabs. Sheets of paper
inserted between exhibits (of any color) are not sufficient to divide the
exhibits. To the extent possible, exhibits should be double-sided.
v. Except in pro se cases, the parties should provide the Court with an
electronic, text-searchable courtesy copy of any hearing or deposition
transcript, or portion thereof, on which the parties rely, if such a copy is
available, unless doing so would be unduly burdensome. (Where feasible,
parties should provide these materials on CD, not on a DVD or memory
stick and not by email.)
C. Oral Argument on Motions. The Court does not usually hear oral argument, but
parties may request oral argument by letter at the time their moving or opposing
or reply papers are filed. The Court will determine whether argument will be
heard and, if so, will advise counsel of the date.
D. Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders (“TROs”). Parties intending
to file applications for TROs or other emergency relief must hand-deliver hard
copies of the motion papers to the Clerk of Court and send the papers (in text-
searchable PDF format) to the Court by email. The email should: (1) include the
word “URGENT” in the subject line; (2) provide a telephone number at which the
filing party and any other relevant parties can be reached; and (3) except for ex
parte applications, provide the relevant parties’ availability for a conference in the
next few days.
3. Pretrial Procedures
A. Joint Pretrial Orders in Civil Cases. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,
within 30 days after the date for completion of discovery in a civil case, or, if a
dispositive motion has been filed, within 30 days of its decision, the parties shall
submit to the Court for its approval a proposed joint pretrial order, which shall
include the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and following:
i. The full caption of the action.
ii. The names, addresses (including firm names), email addresses, and
telephone and fax numbers of trial counsel.
iii. A brief statement by plaintiff as to the basis of subject matter jurisdiction,
and a brief statement by each other party as to the presence or absence of
subject matter jurisdiction. Such statements shall include citations to all
5
statutes relied on and relevant facts as to citizenship and jurisdictional
amount.
iv. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that party has
asserted that remain to be tried, without recital of evidentiary matter but
including citations to all statutes relied on. The parties shall also identify
all claims and defenses previously asserted that are not to be tried.
v. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or
without a jury, and the number of trial days needed.
vi. A statement as to whether all parties have consented to trial of the case by
a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have not so
consented).
vii. Any stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law.
viii. A list of the witnesses each party expects to call on its case in chief,
including a very brief description of the witness’s role and/or the subject
matter of his or her anticipated testimony, and a statement as to whether
any other party objects to the witness. A party should include any witness
it may want for its case in chief even if the other side has listed that
witness.
ix. A designation by each party of deposition testimony to be offered in its
case in chief, with any cross-designations and objections by any other
party. The party designating deposition testimony will be responsible for
providing a transcript with its designations clearly marked (if possible by
highlighting in one color); the other side’s counter-designations clearly
marked (if possible by highlighting in another color); and any objections
succinctly set forth (e.g., “hearsay,” “relevance,” “403”) in the margin
next to the objected-to portion, which shall be identified by a vertical line.
x. A list by each party of exhibits to be offered in its case in chief, with one
star indicating exhibits to which no party objects on grounds of
authenticity, and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on
any ground. These indications are only for the Court’s and the parties’
guidance and are not stipulations. They do not relieve the proponent of
the exhibit of its obligation to establish authenticity and any other
necessary foundation for admission of the exhibit. The parties are
encouraged, however, to enter into stipulations as to authenticity and
admissibility where possible.
6
xi. A statement of damages claimed, itemizing each component or element of
the damages sought with respect to each claim, including the manner and
method used to calculate the claimed damages.
xii. A statement as to whether the parties consent to a less than unanimous
verdict.
B. Filings Prior to Trial in Civil Cases. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,
each party shall file the following documents four (4) weeks before the date of
commencement of trial if such a date has been fixed, or four (4) weeks after the
filing of the joint pretrial order if no date has been fixed:
i. In jury cases, proposed voir dire questions, requests to charge and
proposed verdict form. The plaintiff’s proposed voir dire questions should
include an agreed-upon paragraph (designated as such) for the Court to
use in voir dire to provide the potential jurors with a brief explanation of
the case. If the parties cannot agree on such a paragraph after good-faith
efforts, their respective proposed paragraphs (designated as such) should
be set forth in their respective voir dire submissions. In addition to being
filed in the normal manner, proposed jury instructions should be emailed
(in Word or WordPerfect) to chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov.
Each proposed jury instruction must contain a citation to the
source/authority for the proposed instruction, or the request will be
disregarded.
ii. In non-jury cases, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Proposed findings of fact should be detailed, and proposed conclusions of
law should include a statement of the elements of each claim or defense.
iii. In all cases, motions addressing any evidentiary or other issues that
should be resolved in limine.
iv. In any case where any party believes it would be useful, a pretrial
memorandum; and
v. In non-jury cases:
a. Affidavits constituting the direct testimony of each trial witness
who is within the control of the party or willing to provide such an
affidavit. One week after submission of such affidavits, counsel
for each party shall submit a list of all affiants whom he or she
intends to cross-examine at trial. Only those witnesses who will be
cross-examined need appear at trial. The original affidavit shall be
marked as an exhibit at trial.
7
b. All documentary exhibits, unless they are so voluminous as to
make this requirement impracticable.
C. Filings in Opposition. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any party may file
the following documents within one (1) week of the filing of any document
described in section 3.B. above:
i. Objections to the other party’s proposed voir dire questions, requests to
charge, or proposed verdict form.
ii. Opposition to any motion in limine.
iii. Opposition to any legal argument made in a pretrial memorandum.
4. Argument
The Court encourages senior lawyers to allow junior lawyers the opportunity to argue in
court, whether at a conference, hearing, trial or otherwise. Indeed, the Court prefers that
the lawyer most familiar with an issue argue it in court, regardless of seniority. The
Court may permit more than one lawyer to argue for one party where doing so would
create the opportunity for a junior lawyer to argue.
5. Post-Trial Procedures
Counsel are responsible for raising promptly any issue concerning the accuracy of
transcripts certified by the Court Reporter to be used for purposes of appeal. Counsel
perceiving an error that is material shall stipulate to the appropriate correction or, if
agreement cannot be reached, shall proceed by motion on notice. Non-material defects in
syntax, grammar, spelling or punctuation should be ignored.
6. Default Judgments
A party that wishes to obtain a default judgment must proceed by way of order to show
cause. Follow the Default Judgment Procedure, attached hereto as Attachment A.
7. Applications to be Relieved as Counsel
If an attorney wishes to be relieved as counsel, the client consents, and substitute counsel
is prepared to appear (or an individual party wishes to appear pro se), the substitution
may be accomplished by stipulation signed by attorney(s) and client. If the client
consents and substitute counsel is desired but has not been obtained, the attorney may
submit a stipulation signed by counsel and client, and the Court will set a date by which
substitute counsel must appear for a corporate client and/or by which an individual client
8
must proceed pro se if substitute counsel has not appeared. If the client’s signature on a
stipulation cannot be obtained, counsel must seek to be relieved by submitting a proposed
Order to Show Cause (“OSC”), along with a supporting affidavit and legal authority
justifying his or her withdrawal. Redacted copies may be filed on ECF, with unredacted
hard copies supplied to chambers, if the application includes privileged or sensitive
material. The Court will fill in the date by which counsel must serve the OSC on the
client, the date by which opposition papers must be filed, and the date and time the
application will be heard. Before the return date, counsel must file proof of service of the
OSC on the client.
8. Bankruptcy Appeals
The briefing schedule and format and length specifications set forth in the applicable
provisions of Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8015-8018 shall govern unless
otherwise ordered by the Court. The appeal may be dismissed if the opening brief is not
timely filed. Counsel may apply for an extension of the dates specified in Rule 8018 but
must do so at least three (3) business days before the brief is due.
9. Criminal Cases
A. Initial Matters. Upon assignment of a criminal case to Judge Seibel, the parties
shall immediately arrange with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk for a prompt initial
conference, at which the defendant will be present. The Assistant United States
Attorney (“AUSA”) shall provide to chambers, as soon as practicable, a courtesy
copy of the Indictment or Information, and a courtesy copy of the Complaint, if
one exists.
B. Guilty Pleas. Guilty pleas will ordinarily be taken by Judge Seibel and are not
assigned to Magistrate Judges by standing order. Permission for guilty pleas to be
taken before a Magistrate Judge may be given in special circumstances. The
AUSA shall provide a courtesy copy of the plea agreement to chambers as soon as
practicable.
C. Sentencing. Follow the Procedures for Sentencings, attached hereto as
Attachment B.
9
10. Personal Electronic Devices
S.D.N.Y. Standing Order M10-468, dated February 18, 2010 (available on the Court’s
website) defines “Personal Electronic Devices” and sets forth the requirements for an
attorney to bring such a device into the Courthouse. An attorney who meets those
requirements may bring a Personal Electronic Device into the courtroom, but the device
must be turned off (not merely placed in vibrate mode or otherwise silenced). If an
attorney needs access to such a device during a proceeding (such as when a subsequent
appearance is being scheduled), permission to activate the device should be requested of
the Court. Attorneys may use their devices in the hallway outside the courtroom
(although not in the vestibule to the courtroom), but are asked to be discreet and to keep
their voices down. Attorneys who, under the Standing Order, require the court’s
permission to bring a Personal Electronic Device into the Courthouse, and all attorneys
wishing to bring a General Purpose Computing Device (as defined in the Standing Order)
into the Courthouse, must request the court’s permission three (3) business days in
advance. Last-minute requests will not be considered.
11. Electronic Filing Under Seal in Civil and Miscellaneous Cases
A. Sealing/Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval. Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 5.2 describes sensitive information that must be redacted from public
court filings without seeking prior permission from the Court.
B. Sealing/Redactions Requiring Court Approval. Motions or Letter Motions for
approval of sealed or redacted filings in civil and miscellaneous cases and the
subject document(s), including the proposed sealed document(s), must be filed
electronically through the court’s ECF system in conformity with the court’s
standing order, 19-MC-00583, and ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6.
The motion must be filed in public view, must explain the specific reasons for
seeking to file the information under seal and should not include the information
sought to be filed under seal. Supporting papers must be separately filed
electronically and may be filed under seal or redacted only to the extent necessary
to safeguard information sought to be filed under seal.
The proposed sealed document must be contemporaneously filed under seal in
the ECF system and electronically related to the motion. The summary docket
text, but not the sealed document, will be open to public inspection and should not
include the information sought to be filed under seal.
Where the motion seeks approval to redact information from a document that is to
be publicly filed, the filing party shall: (a) publicly file the document with the
proposed redactions, and (b) electronically file under seal a copy of the
10
unredacted document with the proposed redactions highlighted. Both documents
must be electronically filed through the ECF system and related to the motion.
Any party unable to comply with the requirement for electronic filing under seal
through the ECF system, or who has reason to believe that a particular document
should not be electronically filed, must move for leave of the Court to file on
paper.
12. Artificial Intelligence
Although the use of ChatGPT and other such generative artificial intelligence (“AI”)
tools is not prohibited, unqualified reliance on such tools may result in filings containing
fabricated, inaccurate or misleading case citations, quotations and/or
propositions. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 imposes a duty on attorneys and pro se
litigants to certify that they have conducted a reasonable inquiry and have determined
that any papers filed with the court are well grounded in fact and legally
tenable. Accordingly, failure to exercise due care in reviewing and filing work product
created with the assistance of generative AI or similar tools may violate Rule 11 and
other applicable standards of practice and expose the filer to sanctions or other corrective
or disciplinary action. In short, any attorney or pro se party using AI must verify the
accuracy of each proposition, quotation and citation by reference to the actual case.
11
ATTACHMENT A
DEFAULT JUDGMENT PROCEDURE
1. Prepare a proposed Order to Show Cause for default judgment and make the
Order returnable before Judge Seibel in Courtroom 621 of the United States
Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, New York. Leave blanks for the
Court to fill in: 1) the date and time at which the Order to Show Cause will be
heard; 2) the date by which the moving party must serve the Order to Show Cause
and supporting documents on the non-moving party; and 3) the date by which the
non-moving party must file opposition papers.
2. The following documents must accompany the Order to Show Cause:
A. an attorney’s affidavit or declaration:
1. attaching:
a) copies of the pleadings;
b) a copy of the affidavit of service of the original summons
and complaint; and
c) if failure to answer is the basis for the default, a Certificate
from the Clerk of Court stating that no answer has been
filed;
and
2. setting forth:
a) why a default judgment is appropriate, including a
description of the method and date of service of the original
summons and complaint;
b) whether, if the default is applicable to fewer than all of the
defendants, the Court may appropriately order a default
judgment on the issue of liability and/or damages prior to
resolution of the entire action (see F.R.C.P. Rule 54(b));
c) the proposed Statement of Damages and the basis for each
element of damages including interest, attorney's fees, and
costs; and
12
d) legal authority for why an inquest would be unnecessary (if
applicable);
B. a proposed default judgment, including damage and interest calculations;
3. Electronically file the proposed Order to Show Cause using the filing event
PROPOSED ORDERS and the document PROPOSED ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WITHOUT EMERGENCY RELIEF. Electronically file the following
documents as separate ECF Filing Events: 1) the attorney’s AFFIDAVIT or
DECLARATION in Support; and 2) the PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT
using the Filing Event found under PROPOSED ORDERS.
4. After the Judge signs the Order to Show Cause, it will be docketed. The moving
party must then serve a copy of the Order to Show Cause, and the supporting
documents, on the defendant as directed in the Order to Show Cause
5. Proof of service on the defendant of a copy of the Order to Show Cause and
supporting documents must be electronically filed three (3) business days in
advance of the return date.
13
ATTACHMENT B
PROCEDURES FOR SENTENCINGS
Except for submissions to be filed under seal, every document in a sentencing
submission, including letters, should be filed in the public record through the ECF system, using
the procedures described below, unless permission to the contrary has been obtained.
In this regard, the parties are referred to E-Government Act of 2002 and the Southern
District’s ECF Rules & Instructions, Section 21, Privacy and Public Access to ECF cases,
(“Privacy Policy”) and reminded to not, unless necessary, include the five categories of
“sensitive information” in their submissions (i.e., social security numbers; names of minor
children [use the initials only]; dates of birth [use the year only]; financial account numbers; and
home addresses [use only the city and state]). Parties may redact the five categories of “sensitive
information” and the six categories of information requiring caution (i.e., personal identifying
numbers; medical records, treatment and diagnosis; employment history; individual financial
information; proprietary or trade secret information; and information regarding an individual’s
cooperation with the government) as described in the Privacy Policy, without application to the
Court.
If a party redacts from a sentencing memorandum information beyond the eleven
categories of information identified in the Privacy Policy, an application to do so must be served
at the time the sentencing submission is served. A redacted version of the sentencing submission
must be filed on the ECF system at that time. The application should clearly identify the
redaction and explain the reasons for the redaction. The application will be addressed at the
sentencing proceeding.
If any material is redacted from the publicly filed document, only those pages containing
the redacted material will be filed under seal. Bring a copy of those pages to the sentencing
proceeding, marked to indicate what information has been redacted from the publicly filed
materials, to give to the Court for filing under seal.
If a party believes its entire sentencing submission must be filed under seal, an
application to do so must be served at the time the sentencing submission is served. The
application will be addressed at the sentencing proceeding.
A defendant’s sentencing submission must be served two weeks in advance of the date
set for sentence. The Government’s sentencing submission must be served one week in advance
of the date set for sentence. The parties should provide the Court with one courtesy hard copy.
If the arguments of counsel are contained in a letter, the submission should nevertheless bear a
cover, with the caption and docket number, indicating that it is a “Sentencing Memorandum.”
Letters from those other than counsel should be grouped and filed together as attachments to that
single document marked “Sentencing Memorandum.” The defendant is responsible for filing all
14
letters submitted on behalf of the defendant, including those from friends, relatives, etc. The
Government is responsible for filing all letters from victims.
15
Other judges in S.D.N.Y.
- Stewart D. Aaron
- Ronnie Abrams
- Kim P. Berg
- Richard M. Berman
- Vincent L. Briccetti
- Vernon S. Broderick
- Naomi Reice Buchwald
- Valerie E. Caproni
- Andrew L. Carter Jr.
- P. Kevin Castel
- Sarah L. Cave
- Jessica G. L. Clarke
- Denise L. Cote
- John P. Cronan
- Paul A. Crotty
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Katherine Polk Failla
- Valerie Figueredo
- Jesse M. Furman
- Paul G. Gardephe
- Margaret M. Garnett
- Gabriel W. Gorenstein
- Philip M. Halpern
- Alvin K. Hellerstein
- Dale E. Ho
- Lewis A. Kaplan
- Kenneth M. Karas
- John G. Koeltl
- Andrew E. Krause
- Robert W. Lehrburger
- Lewis J. Liman
- Victor Marrero
- Judith C. McCarthy
- Colleen McMahon
- Barbara Moses
- Alison J. Nathan
- Sarah Netburn
- J. Paul Oetken
- Katharine H. Parker
- Loretta A. Preska
- Jed S. Rakoff
- Edgardo Ramos
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Victoria Reznik
- Henry J. Ricardo
- Jennifer L. Rochon
- Nelson S. Roman
- Lorna G. Schofield
- Louis L. Stanton
- Gary Stein
- Sidney H. Stein
- Arun Subramanian
- Richard J. Sullivan
- Laura Taylor Swain
- Robyn F. Tarnofsky
- Analisa Torres
- Jeannette A. Vargas
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Ona T. Wang
- Jennifer E. Willis
- Kimba M. Wood
- Gregory H. Woods
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Cathy Seibel.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.