Hon. Cathy Seibel — Individual Rules of Practice

S.D.N.Y.

This judge's published rules are on file below; no quick-answer fields have been extracted yet.

What Cathy Seibel's rules say, in the court's own words

Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.

How much notice is required to adjourn?

3

“of a court appearance, absent an emergency the request must be made at least three (3) business days prior to the scheduled appearance. Requests for”

Full published rules for individual rules of practice

September 15, 2026

INDIVIDUAL RULES OF PRACTICE OF JUDGE CATHY SEIBEL

Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Seibel, matters before Judge Seibel shall be conducted in

accordance with the following procedures:

1. Communications with Chambers

A. Letters. Except as otherwise provided below, communications with chambers

shall be by letter, with copies simultaneously delivered to all counsel. Unless

there is a request to file a letter under seal or a letter contains sensitive or

confidential information or the party does not have access to the Electronic Case

Filing (ECF) system, letters must be filed electronically on the ECF system (with

a courtesy copy emailed to the chambers email address,

chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov, as described below). If one of the

exceptions described in the previous sentence applies, a PDF version of a letter

may be emailed to the chambers email address or delivered in hard copy. If a

letter is filed electronically on ECF, a PDF of the filed version of that letter must

also be e-mailed to chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov. Failure to email a

PDF courtesy copy may mean that the letter does not come to the Court’s

attention in a timely manner. Letters solely between parties or their counsel or

otherwise not addressed to the Court may not be filed on ECF or otherwise sent to

the Court. Letter-motions may be made via ECF if they comply with the

S.D.N.Y. Local Rules and the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and

Instructions. Parties may not communicate with chambers directly by email.

Email is to be used only to submit courtesy copies of letters filed on ECF or to

submit a PDF of a letter if one of the exceptions set forth in the second sentence

above applies or as permitted in section 1.B. below. If a party believes an

exception to this rule is warranted, it must obtain permission from chambers

before using email other than as outlined above.

B. Urgent Communications. Telephone calls to chambers are permitted only in

situations requiring immediate attention. In such situations, email the chambers

email box to request the phone number, and place “URGENT” in the subject line

of the email. If an ECF submission requires immediate attention, the filing party

should email courtesy copies of the filing and place “URGENT” in the subject

line.

C. Docketing, Scheduling, and Calendar Matters. Please contact Courtroom

Deputy Clerk Walter Clark at walter_clark@nysd.uscourts.gov between 9 am and

5 pm.

D. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for

adjournments or extensions of time shall be by letter and must (unless to be sealed

or containing sensitive/confidential information or the party lacks access to the

ECF system) be filed on ECF as letter-motions, with a PDF courtesy copy to

chambers as described in item 1.A above. All requests for adjournment or

extensions must state (1) the original date, (2) the number of previous requests for

adjournment or extension, and the reason for those requests, (3) whether these

previous requests were granted or denied, (4) the reason for the instant request,

and (5) whether the adversary consents, and, if not, the reasons given by the

adversary for refusing to consent. If the requested adjournment or extension

affects any other scheduled dates, a proposed Revised Scheduling Order (with

deadlines falling only on business days) must be attached. Absent extraordinary

circumstances, requests for extensions will be denied if not made promptly and

before the expiration of the original deadline. If the request is for an adjournment

of a court appearance, absent an emergency the request must be made at least

three (3) business days prior to the scheduled appearance. Requests for

extensions of deadlines regarding a matter that has been referred to a Magistrate

Judge must be directed to that Magistrate Judge.

E. Courtesy Copies. As noted in item 1.A above, if a letter is filed electronically

on ECF, a PDF file of that letter must also be e-mailed to

chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov. The courtesy copy of any letter filed on

ECF must be a copy of the filed version of the letter and must include the

automatically generated ECF header (that is, the text – e.g., “Case 7:24-cv-1234-

CS Document 100 Filed 7/1/24 Page 1 of 1” – appearing at the top of each page

of the document on the ECF system). One (1) courtesy hard copy of all

pleadings, motion papers (with the exception of motions for admission pro hac

vice) and other documents (aside from letters) filed via ECF shall be submitted to

chambers at the time the papers are served. See section 2.B below regarding

motion papers. If hand-delivered, courtesy copies should be brought to the

Clerk’s Office on the first floor of the Courthouse, not to chambers.

F. Pro Se Parties. Pro se (unrepresented) parties are encouraged to consent to

electronic service (via the Consent to Electronic Service form available on the

Court’s website). Unless the Court grants permission to file documents

electronically, all communications with the Court by a pro se party must be

emailed to ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov or delivered or mailed to:

Pro Se Intake Unit Pro Se Intake Unit

Charles L. Brieant U.S. Courthouse or U.S. Courthouse

300 Quarropas Street 500 Pearl Street (Room 205)

White Plains, NY 10601 New York, NY 10007

Pro se parties using the ProSe email box will receive an auto-generated message

confirming receipt of their email, but that does not mean that the document has

been filed on the docket. The filing party must check the docket to see if the

document has been filed and may contact the Pro Se Intake Unit at 212-805-0175

for assistance if the document has not been docketed after two business days.

2

Except as set forth in items 1.A and 1.B above, parties may not communicate

directly with chambers by email.

Pro se parties are advised that there is a Pro Se Law Clinic available to assist self-

represented parties in civil cases. The Clinic may be able to provide a pro se party

with advice in connection with their case. The Pro Se Law Clinic is run by a

private organization called the City Bar Justice Center; it is not part of, or run by,

the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of

the Court, which must still be made by any self-represented party through the Pro

Se Intake Unit or the pro se email box). Litigants in need of legal assistance

should complete the City Bar Justice Center’s intake form to make an

appointment. If a litigant has questions about the intake form or needs to highlight

an urgent deadline already disclosed in the form, the clinic can be contacted by

phone (212-382-4794) or email (fedprosdny@nycbar.org). In-person

appointments at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in Manhattan and the Charles

L. Brieant Jr. Courthouse in White Plains, or remote appointments, are available.

2. Motions in Civil Cases

A. Pre-Motion Conference in Civil Cases.

For discovery motions, follow Local Civil Rule 37.2, requiring the moving party

to request an informal conference with the Court before the filing of any such

motion. Strict adherence to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) – the “meet and confer” rule

– is required. The parties should be prepared to describe the time, place and

duration of the meeting, and to identify the counsel involved.

A pre-motion conference with the Court is required before making any other

motion, except motions for admission pro hac vice, motions for reargument or

reconsideration, motions for temporary restraining orders or preliminary

injunctions, motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2), or motions for which the

Court has already set a briefing schedule. To arrange a pre-motion conference,

the moving party must submit a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, setting forth

the basis for the anticipated motion. The Court will then set the date for the pre-

motion conference, and at least one week before that conference , the opposing

party must submit a letter, also not to exceed three (3) pages, setting forth its

position – unless the Court has already set a schedule for pre-motion letters, in

which case that schedule should be followed. If a pre-motion conference is

requested in connection with a proposed motion to dismiss, the request will stay

the deadline for the requesting party to move or answer, and a new deadline will

be set at the conference or after the motion is decided. A party need not comply

with the pre-motion conference requirement where it reasonably believes that

3

delay in filing might result in the loss of a right. In that event, the party should

file, along with the motion, a letter explaining why the party believes it might be

prejudiced if it complied with the pre-motion conference requirement.

B. Motion Papers.

i. Unless prior permission has been granted – and except for motions to

reconsider, which are governed by Local Rule 6.3 – memoranda of law in

support of and in opposition to motions are limited to 8750 words, and

reply memoranda are limited to 3500, in accordance with Local Rule 7.1.

Memoranda of ten (10) pages or more shall contain a table of contents and

table of authorities. All memoranda of law must be double-spaced and

shall be in 12-point font or larger, with one-inch (1") margins on all sides.

Footnotes may be single-spaced but must also be in 12-point font or

larger. Sur-reply memoranda will not be accepted unless the Court’s prior

permission has been obtained. Memoranda must be text-searchable when

filed electronically on ECF.

ii. All courtesy copies submitted in connection with motions must be bound

in any manner that is secure, does not obscure the text, and permits the

document to lie reasonably flat when open. Parties should submit multiple

volumes rather than large documents that do not lie reasonably flat when

open. Preferred forms of binding are three-ring binders and spiral binding.

Paper-and-plastic binding is acceptable as long as the pages will lay flat.

Metal prong fasteners are not acceptable.

iii. All courtesy copies must include the automatically generated ECF header

(that is, the text – e.g., “Case 7:24-cv-1234-CS Document 100 Filed

7/1/24 Page 1 of 1” – appearing at the top of each page of the document on

the ECF system), unless the papers have not yet been filed on the docket.

C. Special Rules for Summary Judgment Motions

i. Except in pro se cases where the moving or non-moving party does not

have access to word processing, the moving party shall provide all other

parties with an electronic copy of the moving party’s Statement of

Material Facts Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1. The opposing party

must reproduce each entry in the moving party’s Rule 56.1 Statement, and

set out the opposing party’s response directly beneath it.

ii. The moving party’s Statement of Material Facts Pursuant to Local Civil

Rule 56.1 may not exceed 25 double-spaced pages without prior

permission of the Court.

4

iii. Any deposition that is filed, whether in whole or in part, must be text-

searchable.

iv. Exhibits should always be separated by protruding tabs. Sheets of paper

inserted between exhibits (of any color) are not sufficient to divide the

exhibits. To the extent possible, exhibits should be double-sided.

v. Except in pro se cases, the parties should provide the Court with an

electronic, text-searchable courtesy copy of any hearing or deposition

transcript, or portion thereof, on which the parties rely, if such a copy is

available, unless doing so would be unduly burdensome. (Where feasible,

parties should provide these materials on CD, not on a DVD or memory

stick and not by email.)

C. Oral Argument on Motions. The Court does not usually hear oral argument, but

parties may request oral argument by letter at the time their moving or opposing

or reply papers are filed. The Court will determine whether argument will be

heard and, if so, will advise counsel of the date.

D. Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders (“TROs”). Parties intending

to file applications for TROs or other emergency relief must hand-deliver hard

copies of the motion papers to the Clerk of Court and send the papers (in text-

searchable PDF format) to the Court by email. The email should: (1) include the

word “URGENT” in the subject line; (2) provide a telephone number at which the

filing party and any other relevant parties can be reached; and (3) except for ex

parte applications, provide the relevant parties’ availability for a conference in the

next few days.

3. Pretrial Procedures

A. Joint Pretrial Orders in Civil Cases. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,

within 30 days after the date for completion of discovery in a civil case, or, if a

dispositive motion has been filed, within 30 days of its decision, the parties shall

submit to the Court for its approval a proposed joint pretrial order, which shall

include the information required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and following:

i. The full caption of the action.

ii. The names, addresses (including firm names), email addresses, and

telephone and fax numbers of trial counsel.

iii. A brief statement by plaintiff as to the basis of subject matter jurisdiction,

and a brief statement by each other party as to the presence or absence of

subject matter jurisdiction. Such statements shall include citations to all

5

statutes relied on and relevant facts as to citizenship and jurisdictional

amount.

iv. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that party has

asserted that remain to be tried, without recital of evidentiary matter but

including citations to all statutes relied on. The parties shall also identify

all claims and defenses previously asserted that are not to be tried.

v. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or

without a jury, and the number of trial days needed.

vi. A statement as to whether all parties have consented to trial of the case by

a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have not so

consented).

vii. Any stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law.

viii. A list of the witnesses each party expects to call on its case in chief,

including a very brief description of the witness’s role and/or the subject

matter of his or her anticipated testimony, and a statement as to whether

any other party objects to the witness. A party should include any witness

it may want for its case in chief even if the other side has listed that

witness.

ix. A designation by each party of deposition testimony to be offered in its

case in chief, with any cross-designations and objections by any other

party. The party designating deposition testimony will be responsible for

providing a transcript with its designations clearly marked (if possible by

highlighting in one color); the other side’s counter-designations clearly

marked (if possible by highlighting in another color); and any objections

succinctly set forth (e.g., “hearsay,” “relevance,” “403”) in the margin

next to the objected-to portion, which shall be identified by a vertical line.

x. A list by each party of exhibits to be offered in its case in chief, with one

star indicating exhibits to which no party objects on grounds of

authenticity, and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on

any ground. These indications are only for the Court’s and the parties’

guidance and are not stipulations. They do not relieve the proponent of

the exhibit of its obligation to establish authenticity and any other

necessary foundation for admission of the exhibit. The parties are

encouraged, however, to enter into stipulations as to authenticity and

admissibility where possible.

6

xi. A statement of damages claimed, itemizing each component or element of

the damages sought with respect to each claim, including the manner and

method used to calculate the claimed damages.

xii. A statement as to whether the parties consent to a less than unanimous

verdict.

B. Filings Prior to Trial in Civil Cases. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,

each party shall file the following documents four (4) weeks before the date of

commencement of trial if such a date has been fixed, or four (4) weeks after the

filing of the joint pretrial order if no date has been fixed:

i. In jury cases, proposed voir dire questions, requests to charge and

proposed verdict form. The plaintiff’s proposed voir dire questions should

include an agreed-upon paragraph (designated as such) for the Court to

use in voir dire to provide the potential jurors with a brief explanation of

the case. If the parties cannot agree on such a paragraph after good-faith

efforts, their respective proposed paragraphs (designated as such) should

be set forth in their respective voir dire submissions. In addition to being

filed in the normal manner, proposed jury instructions should be emailed

(in Word or WordPerfect) to chambersnysdseibel@nysd.uscourts.gov.

Each proposed jury instruction must contain a citation to the

source/authority for the proposed instruction, or the request will be

disregarded.

ii. In non-jury cases, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Proposed findings of fact should be detailed, and proposed conclusions of

law should include a statement of the elements of each claim or defense.

iii. In all cases, motions addressing any evidentiary or other issues that

should be resolved in limine.

iv. In any case where any party believes it would be useful, a pretrial

memorandum; and

v. In non-jury cases:

a. Affidavits constituting the direct testimony of each trial witness

who is within the control of the party or willing to provide such an

affidavit. One week after submission of such affidavits, counsel

for each party shall submit a list of all affiants whom he or she

intends to cross-examine at trial. Only those witnesses who will be

cross-examined need appear at trial. The original affidavit shall be

marked as an exhibit at trial.

7

b. All documentary exhibits, unless they are so voluminous as to

make this requirement impracticable.

C. Filings in Opposition. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any party may file

the following documents within one (1) week of the filing of any document

described in section 3.B. above:

i. Objections to the other party’s proposed voir dire questions, requests to

charge, or proposed verdict form.

ii. Opposition to any motion in limine.

iii. Opposition to any legal argument made in a pretrial memorandum.

4. Argument

The Court encourages senior lawyers to allow junior lawyers the opportunity to argue in

court, whether at a conference, hearing, trial or otherwise. Indeed, the Court prefers that

the lawyer most familiar with an issue argue it in court, regardless of seniority. The

Court may permit more than one lawyer to argue for one party where doing so would

create the opportunity for a junior lawyer to argue.

5. Post-Trial Procedures

Counsel are responsible for raising promptly any issue concerning the accuracy of

transcripts certified by the Court Reporter to be used for purposes of appeal. Counsel

perceiving an error that is material shall stipulate to the appropriate correction or, if

agreement cannot be reached, shall proceed by motion on notice. Non-material defects in

syntax, grammar, spelling or punctuation should be ignored.

6. Default Judgments

A party that wishes to obtain a default judgment must proceed by way of order to show

cause. Follow the Default Judgment Procedure, attached hereto as Attachment A.

7. Applications to be Relieved as Counsel

If an attorney wishes to be relieved as counsel, the client consents, and substitute counsel

is prepared to appear (or an individual party wishes to appear pro se), the substitution

may be accomplished by stipulation signed by attorney(s) and client. If the client

consents and substitute counsel is desired but has not been obtained, the attorney may

submit a stipulation signed by counsel and client, and the Court will set a date by which

substitute counsel must appear for a corporate client and/or by which an individual client

8

must proceed pro se if substitute counsel has not appeared. If the client’s signature on a

stipulation cannot be obtained, counsel must seek to be relieved by submitting a proposed

Order to Show Cause (“OSC”), along with a supporting affidavit and legal authority

justifying his or her withdrawal. Redacted copies may be filed on ECF, with unredacted

hard copies supplied to chambers, if the application includes privileged or sensitive

material. The Court will fill in the date by which counsel must serve the OSC on the

client, the date by which opposition papers must be filed, and the date and time the

application will be heard. Before the return date, counsel must file proof of service of the

OSC on the client.

8. Bankruptcy Appeals

The briefing schedule and format and length specifications set forth in the applicable

provisions of Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 8015-8018 shall govern unless

otherwise ordered by the Court. The appeal may be dismissed if the opening brief is not

timely filed. Counsel may apply for an extension of the dates specified in Rule 8018 but

must do so at least three (3) business days before the brief is due.

9. Criminal Cases

A. Initial Matters. Upon assignment of a criminal case to Judge Seibel, the parties

shall immediately arrange with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk for a prompt initial

conference, at which the defendant will be present. The Assistant United States

Attorney (“AUSA”) shall provide to chambers, as soon as practicable, a courtesy

copy of the Indictment or Information, and a courtesy copy of the Complaint, if

one exists.

B. Guilty Pleas. Guilty pleas will ordinarily be taken by Judge Seibel and are not

assigned to Magistrate Judges by standing order. Permission for guilty pleas to be

taken before a Magistrate Judge may be given in special circumstances. The

AUSA shall provide a courtesy copy of the plea agreement to chambers as soon as

practicable.

C. Sentencing. Follow the Procedures for Sentencings, attached hereto as

Attachment B.

9

10. Personal Electronic Devices

S.D.N.Y. Standing Order M10-468, dated February 18, 2010 (available on the Court’s

website) defines “Personal Electronic Devices” and sets forth the requirements for an

attorney to bring such a device into the Courthouse. An attorney who meets those

requirements may bring a Personal Electronic Device into the courtroom, but the device

must be turned off (not merely placed in vibrate mode or otherwise silenced). If an

attorney needs access to such a device during a proceeding (such as when a subsequent

appearance is being scheduled), permission to activate the device should be requested of

the Court. Attorneys may use their devices in the hallway outside the courtroom

(although not in the vestibule to the courtroom), but are asked to be discreet and to keep

their voices down. Attorneys who, under the Standing Order, require the court’s

permission to bring a Personal Electronic Device into the Courthouse, and all attorneys

wishing to bring a General Purpose Computing Device (as defined in the Standing Order)

into the Courthouse, must request the court’s permission three (3) business days in

advance. Last-minute requests will not be considered.

11. Electronic Filing Under Seal in Civil and Miscellaneous Cases

A. Sealing/Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval. Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 5.2 describes sensitive information that must be redacted from public

court filings without seeking prior permission from the Court.

B. Sealing/Redactions Requiring Court Approval. Motions or Letter Motions for

approval of sealed or redacted filings in civil and miscellaneous cases and the

subject document(s), including the proposed sealed document(s), must be filed

electronically through the court’s ECF system in conformity with the court’s

standing order, 19-MC-00583, and ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6.

The motion must be filed in public view, must explain the specific reasons for

seeking to file the information under seal and should not include the information

sought to be filed under seal. Supporting papers must be separately filed

electronically and may be filed under seal or redacted only to the extent necessary

to safeguard information sought to be filed under seal.

The proposed sealed document must be contemporaneously filed under seal in

the ECF system and electronically related to the motion. The summary docket

text, but not the sealed document, will be open to public inspection and should not

include the information sought to be filed under seal.

Where the motion seeks approval to redact information from a document that is to

be publicly filed, the filing party shall: (a) publicly file the document with the

proposed redactions, and (b) electronically file under seal a copy of the

10

unredacted document with the proposed redactions highlighted. Both documents

must be electronically filed through the ECF system and related to the motion.

Any party unable to comply with the requirement for electronic filing under seal

through the ECF system, or who has reason to believe that a particular document

should not be electronically filed, must move for leave of the Court to file on

paper.

12. Artificial Intelligence

Although the use of ChatGPT and other such generative artificial intelligence (“AI”)

tools is not prohibited, unqualified reliance on such tools may result in filings containing

fabricated, inaccurate or misleading case citations, quotations and/or

propositions. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 imposes a duty on attorneys and pro se

litigants to certify that they have conducted a reasonable inquiry and have determined

that any papers filed with the court are well grounded in fact and legally

tenable. Accordingly, failure to exercise due care in reviewing and filing work product

created with the assistance of generative AI or similar tools may violate Rule 11 and

other applicable standards of practice and expose the filer to sanctions or other corrective

or disciplinary action. In short, any attorney or pro se party using AI must verify the

accuracy of each proposition, quotation and citation by reference to the actual case.

11

ATTACHMENT A

DEFAULT JUDGMENT PROCEDURE

1. Prepare a proposed Order to Show Cause for default judgment and make the

Order returnable before Judge Seibel in Courtroom 621 of the United States

Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, New York. Leave blanks for the

Court to fill in: 1) the date and time at which the Order to Show Cause will be

heard; 2) the date by which the moving party must serve the Order to Show Cause

and supporting documents on the non-moving party; and 3) the date by which the

non-moving party must file opposition papers.

2. The following documents must accompany the Order to Show Cause:

A. an attorney’s affidavit or declaration:

1. attaching:

a) copies of the pleadings;

b) a copy of the affidavit of service of the original summons

and complaint; and

c) if failure to answer is the basis for the default, a Certificate

from the Clerk of Court stating that no answer has been

filed;

and

2. setting forth:

a) why a default judgment is appropriate, including a

description of the method and date of service of the original

summons and complaint;

b) whether, if the default is applicable to fewer than all of the

defendants, the Court may appropriately order a default

judgment on the issue of liability and/or damages prior to

resolution of the entire action (see F.R.C.P. Rule 54(b));

c) the proposed Statement of Damages and the basis for each

element of damages including interest, attorney's fees, and

costs; and

12

d) legal authority for why an inquest would be unnecessary (if

applicable);

B. a proposed default judgment, including damage and interest calculations;

3. Electronically file the proposed Order to Show Cause using the filing event

PROPOSED ORDERS and the document PROPOSED ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE WITHOUT EMERGENCY RELIEF. Electronically file the following

documents as separate ECF Filing Events: 1) the attorney’s AFFIDAVIT or

DECLARATION in Support; and 2) the PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT

using the Filing Event found under PROPOSED ORDERS.

4. After the Judge signs the Order to Show Cause, it will be docketed. The moving

party must then serve a copy of the Order to Show Cause, and the supporting

documents, on the defendant as directed in the Order to Show Cause

5. Proof of service on the defendant of a copy of the Order to Show Cause and

supporting documents must be electronically filed three (3) business days in

advance of the return date.

13

ATTACHMENT B

PROCEDURES FOR SENTENCINGS

Except for submissions to be filed under seal, every document in a sentencing

submission, including letters, should be filed in the public record through the ECF system, using

the procedures described below, unless permission to the contrary has been obtained.

In this regard, the parties are referred to E-Government Act of 2002 and the Southern

District’s ECF Rules & Instructions, Section 21, Privacy and Public Access to ECF cases,

(“Privacy Policy”) and reminded to not, unless necessary, include the five categories of

“sensitive information” in their submissions (i.e., social security numbers; names of minor

children [use the initials only]; dates of birth [use the year only]; financial account numbers; and

home addresses [use only the city and state]). Parties may redact the five categories of “sensitive

information” and the six categories of information requiring caution (i.e., personal identifying

numbers; medical records, treatment and diagnosis; employment history; individual financial

information; proprietary or trade secret information; and information regarding an individual’s

cooperation with the government) as described in the Privacy Policy, without application to the

Court.

If a party redacts from a sentencing memorandum information beyond the eleven

categories of information identified in the Privacy Policy, an application to do so must be served

at the time the sentencing submission is served. A redacted version of the sentencing submission

must be filed on the ECF system at that time. The application should clearly identify the

redaction and explain the reasons for the redaction. The application will be addressed at the

sentencing proceeding.

If any material is redacted from the publicly filed document, only those pages containing

the redacted material will be filed under seal. Bring a copy of those pages to the sentencing

proceeding, marked to indicate what information has been redacted from the publicly filed

materials, to give to the Court for filing under seal.

If a party believes its entire sentencing submission must be filed under seal, an

application to do so must be served at the time the sentencing submission is served. The

application will be addressed at the sentencing proceeding.

A defendant’s sentencing submission must be served two weeks in advance of the date

set for sentence. The Government’s sentencing submission must be served one week in advance

of the date set for sentence. The parties should provide the Court with one courtesy hard copy.

If the arguments of counsel are contained in a letter, the submission should nevertheless bear a

cover, with the caption and docket number, indicating that it is a “Sentencing Memorandum.”

Letters from those other than counsel should be grouped and filed together as attachments to that

single document marked “Sentencing Memorandum.” The defendant is responsible for filing all

14

letters submitted on behalf of the defendant, including those from friends, relatives, etc. The

Government is responsible for filing all letters from victims.

15

Updated by the court: not stated on the court's page
Checked by us: Oct. 9, 2026, 11:50 a.m.

Other judges in S.D.N.Y.

Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Cathy Seibel.

Compare across judges