Hon. P. Kevin Castel — Individual Rules of Practice
S.D.N.Y.
This judge's published rules are on file below; no quick-answer fields have been extracted yet.
No individual facts have been extracted from this page yet. The full published text is below, exactly as the court publishes it.
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
Individual Practices in Civil Cases
P. Kevin Castel, United States District Judge
Chambers Courtroom
United States District Court Courtroom 11D
Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street
500 Pearl Street Florence Nacanther, Courtroom Deputy
New York, New York 10007
CastelNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov
Unless otherwise ordered, all civil actions and miscellaneous matters before Judge
Castel shall be conducted in accordance with the following practices.
1. Communications
A. Letters.
i. Communications with the Court shall be by letter and filed on
ECF. Absent a specific direction from the Court, the text of an
email transmitted to Chambers does not qualify as a letter and its
contents will not be addressed by the Court or Chambers’ Staff.
ii. All letters must contain the docket number of the action, as well
as the docket number of any related action before the Judge (e.g.
25 cv 3456(PKC) [rel. 25 cv 3457(PKC)]).
iii. The first paragraph of all letters must set forth the date of the
next conference before the Court.
B. Questions and Matters Requiring Immediate Attention. Questions or
requests on matters of scheduling, substance or procedure should be presented
by letter. (See 1.A.) For matters requiring immediate attention, please email
C. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for
adjournments or extensions of time shall be made by letter filed on ECF. The
letter should state:
i. the date sought to be adjourned or extended;
ii. the reasons for the request;
iii. whether any adjournment or extension of the date was previously
sought and whether it was granted;
iv. whether the adversary consents to the request and, if not, the
reasons given by the adversary for declining to consent; and
v. the information in 1.A. ii & iii above.
vi. A request for an extension of the schedule for completion of
discovery shall attach a proposed Revised Case Management
Plan and Scheduling Order (reflecting actual dates which are
business days). It should also include a request to adjourn the
next conference to a date at least 14 days after any proposed date
for the close of fact discovery.
vii. A request for an adjournment of time to answer a complaint
should include a request to adjourn the initial conference to a
date at least 14 days after the answer would be due.
viii. A request for adjournment of a motion schedule shall include
proposed dates for all submissions of all parties relating to the
motion.
D. Courtesy Copies. If, but only if, they exceed 40 pages in length,
courtesy copies of all pleadings (complaint, answer, counterclaim, etc.) shall be
sent to Chambers within five days of filing.
E. Electronic Device Request. The Electronic Device Request form
should not be submitted on ECF. It should be emailed to the Chambers’ email.
It will be processed and returned to the requesting party and the party should
bring a copy of the signed Request Form to Court.
2. Case Management Plans. For all civil cases, the parties shall confer and prepare a
proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order (a model Plan and Order is
found under Judge Castel’s name on the Court website) and the agreed upon Plan and
Order (together with any alternate proposal) shall be filed on ECF no later than 48
hours before the Initial Pretrial Conference.
3. Motions
A. Pre-Motion Letter in Civil Cases
i. The filing of a Pre-Motion letter to the Court is required prior to
the filing of all motions, except the following:
a Discovery motions, which are governed by 3.B. below;
b Motions brought by order to show cause;
c Motions by incarcerated pro se litigants;
d Motions for a default judgment;
e Motions for appointment of lead counsel under the PSLRA;
f Motions for admission pro hac vice;
g Motions to withdraw as counsel;
h Motions for reconsideration;
i Motions to seal or unseal (see 5.B below);
j Motions relating to discovery which shall be brought on in
compliance with 3.B below;
k Any motion described in Rule 6(b)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule
4(a)(4)(A), Fed. R. App., or section 1447 of title 28.
ii. The letter shall set forth in detail the legal and factual basis for
the anticipated motion and a proposed schedule for the motion.
iii. A response to the letter shall be filed within four business days.
iv. If a Pre-Motion Letter seeks to file a motion to dismiss, the party
responding shall unambiguously state in the first paragraph
whether he, she or it seeks leave to amend. The Pre-Motion
Letter and response will be taken into account in deciding
whether further leave to amend will be granted in the event the
motion to dismiss is granted. Among other purposes, the Pre-
Motion Letter and response enables the Court to set an
appropriate briefing schedule and to explore whether the motion
may be (a) obviated by an amendment to the pleadings or
consent to the relief; or (b) deferred to a different juncture in the
case.
v. The transmittal of a Pre-Motion Letter for a proposed motion
under Rule 12(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., stays the time to answer or
move until further order of the Court.
vi. The Pre-Motion Letter shall state in the first paragraph the date
of any conference scheduled before the Court.
B. Discovery Disputes. Discovery Disputes shall be brought on by letter motion
and the parties shall comply with Local Civil Rule 37.2 unless otherwise
ordered. A Discovery Dispute Letter to the Court shall contain the certification
required under Rule 37(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., and set forth the full text of any a
discovery request and response or objection thereto, together with any case law
support and any affidavits required to adjudicate the issue. The party from
whom discovery is sought shall respond within four business days and shall
include any case law support and any affidavits required to adjudicate the
motion.
C. Motion Response Time. Unless otherwise ordered, the time for a response or
reply to a motion is as set forth in Local Civil Rule 6.1. (The response time to a
Pre-Motion Letter or Discovery Dispute are as set forth in 3.A.iii and 3.B.)
D. Memoranda of Law. Unless prior permission has been granted, memoranda of
law in support of and in opposition to motions are limited to 25 pages, and reply
memoranda are limited to 10 pages. A memorandum of 10 pages or more shall
contain a table of contents.
E. Courtesy Copies. Courtesy copies of all motion papers shall be submitted in
hard copy to Chambers within four days of filing.
F. Oral Argument on Motions. Parties may request oral argument by letter. The
court will determine whether argument will be heard and, if so, will advise
counsel of the argument date.
G. Summary Judgment.
i. A summary judgment movant shall provide the opposing party with a
copy of its Local Rule 56.1(a)(1) Statement in Microsoft Word format within
four days of filing.
ii. The Local Rule 56.1(a)(2) Statement by the party opposing summary
judgment shall set forth verbatim the text of each paragraph of the Local Rule
56.1(a)(1) Statement of the movant immediately preceding its response thereto.
H. Default Judgment. A party seeking a default judgment must proceed by filing
a motion for default judgment on ECF pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P.
and Local Civil Rule 55.2(b). A party seeking a default judgment should not
proceed by order to show cause. The motion must be supported by the following
papers:
i. an attorney’s affidavit or declaration setting forth:
(a) the basis for entering a default judgment, including a description of
the method and date of service of the summons and complaint;
(b) the procedural history beyond service of the summons and
complaint, if any;
(c) whether, if the default is applicable to fewer than all of the
defendants, the Court may appropriately order a default judgment
on the issue of damages prior to resolution of the entire action;
(d) the proposed damages and the basis for each element of damages,
including interest, attorney’s fees, and costs; and
(e) an explanation why an inquest into damages would be necessary or
not.
ii. a proposed default judgment;
iii. a copy of the affidavit of service of the summons and complaint; and
iv. if failure to answer is the basis for the default, a Certificate from the Clerk
of Court stating that no answer has been filed.
The Court for a motion for default judgment shall be served on the party against whom default
judgment is sought. The time for a response and reply are as set forth in Local Civil Rule 6.1.
4. Confidentiality Orders. Any proposed Confidentiality Order shall contain the
following language:
Notwithstanding any other provision, no document may be
filed with the Clerk under seal without a further Order of this Court
addressing the specific documents or portions of documents to be
sealed. Any application to seal shall be accompanied by an affidavit
or affidavits and a memorandum of law, demonstrating that the
standards for sealing have been met and specifically addressing the
applicability of Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110,
119-120 (2d Cir. 2006) and any other controlling authority. Unless
otherwise ordered, a party seeking to file an opposing party’s
confidential information shall so advise the opposing party fourteen
(14) days in advance specifying the precise portion of the
information the party seeks to use, the general purpose thereof and
any redactions to which the party does not object. Within seven (7)
days thereafter, the party whose confidential information is sought
to be used may make an application to seal in accordance with the
first paragraph of this Order, indicating the portion or portions of
the information it seeks to have sealed. Nothing herein is intended
to alter or modify the applicability of Rule 5.2, Fed. R. Civ. P., to
this case. The redactions expressly authorized by Rule 5.2 may be
made without further application to the Court.
5. Sealing in Civil and Miscellaneous Cases: ECF Requirements
A. Sealing/Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval. Rule 5.2, Fed. R. Civ. P.,
describes sensitive information that must be redacted from public court filings
and such redactions shall be made without seeking prior permission from the
Court.
B. Sealing/Redaction Requiring Court Approval. Motions or Letter Motions for
approval of sealed or redacted filings in civil and miscellaneous cases and the
subject documents, including the proposed sealed document(s), must be filed
electronically through the court’s ECF system in conformity with the Court’s
Standing Order, 19-mc-00583, and ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6.
Specifically, the following procedures must be followed:
i The motion must be filed in public view, must explain the particular
reasons for seeking to file that information under seal and should not include
confidential information sought to be filed under seal. Supporting papers must be
separately filed electronically and may be filed under seal or redacted only to the
extent necessary to safeguard information sought to be filed under seal.
ii. The proposed sealed document must be contemporaneously filed under
seal in the ECF system and electronically related to the motion. The summary
docket text, but not the sealed document, will be open to public inspection and
should not include confidential information sought to be filed under seal.
iii. Where the motion seeks approval to redact information from a document
that is to be publicly filed, the filing party shall: (a) publicly file the document with
the proposed redactions, and (b) electronically file under seal a copy of the
unredacted document with the proposed redactions highlighted. Both documents
must be electronically filed through the ECF system and related to the motion.
iv. Any party unable to comply with the requirement for electronic filing
under seal through the ECF system, or who has reason to believe that a particular
document should not be electronically filed, must move for leave of the Court to
file in the traditional manner, on paper.
6. Final Pretrial Submissions. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no later than 45
days following the scheduled date for completion of fact and expert discovery, the
parties shall submit to the Court and electronically file:
A. A proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order that includes the information required by
Rule 26(a)(3), Fed. R. Civ. P., and also the following:
i. The names, addresses, mobile phone numbers and email addresses of all
counsel participating in the trial.
ii. Stipulations of fact and testimony, including a certification by lead trial
counsel for all parties that they have met face-to-face for the purpose of
endeavoring to reach agreement upon stipulations of fact and
stipulations of testimony and the content of their stipulations.
iii. A statement of the claims and defenses that remain to be tried. Any
claim or defense not so identified is deemed withdrawn.
iv. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or
without a jury, and the number of trial days needed.
v. A page and line designation of deposition testimony to be offered by
each party on the party’s case-in-chief, with any cross-designations and
objections by any other party.
vi. A list by each party of exhibits to be offered in the party’s case-in-chief,
with one star indicating exhibits to which no party objects on grounds of
authenticity, and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects
on any ground.
vii. A statement of the damages claimed and any relief sought, including the
manner and method used to calculate the claimed damages and a
breakdown of its elements.
B. Unless otherwise ordered, any motions in limine shall be filed within 21 days
following the scheduled date for completion of fact and expert discovery and
responded to within 14 days of service.
C. In addition to A and B above, in any action to be tried to a jury, the following
shall be submitted:
i. proposed voir dire;
ii. proposed jury instructions; and
iii. proposed verdict form.
Unless otherwise ordered, plaintiff shall file (i), (ii), and (iii) 21 days following
the scheduled date for completion of fact and expert discovery and defendant’s
response (including areas of agreement) and counterproposals on (i), (ii) and
(iii) shall be filed 14 days thereafter. These submissions must be filed on ECF
with a copy in Microsoft Word submitted to Chambers electronically within
four days.
D. In addition to A and B above, in any action to be tried to the Court without a
jury, the following procedures shall govern, unless otherwise ordered:
i. The direct testimony of each witness under the control of a party (i.e.
excluding adverse witnesses and witnesses whose appearance must be
compelled by subpoena) shall be presented in the form of an affidavit or
declaration setting forth the narrative of their testimony in numbered
paragraphs.
ii. The direct testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses shall be filed 21 days
following the scheduled date for completion of fact and expert discovery
and the direct of the defendant’s direct testimony shall be filed 14 days
thereafter. The direct testimony of each witness shall be delivered to
Chambers within four days of filing in both hard copy and Microsoft
Word.
iii. At trial, each witness whose direct testimony previously has been
submitted in affidavit or declaration form shall appear and under oath
shall reaffirm that the affidavit or declaration is true and correct. The
party offering the witness then shall offer the affidavit or declaration as
an exhibit, subject to appropriate objections by the opposing party. For
good cause shown, the witness then may be allowed to supplement his
or her statement by additional direct testimony. Thereafter, cross-
examination and any redirect shall proceed in the ordinary course.
iv. The parties may by agreement waive the appearance and cross-
examination of any witness.
7. Trials and Hearings
A. Exhibits. Unless otherwise ordered, all trial or hearing exhibits
shall be pre-marked with exhibit letters for the plaintiff (e.g. PX A, PX
B, etc.) and numbers for the defendant (e.g. DX 1, DX 2, etc.) A party
shall have two hard copies of all trial exhibits in the Courtroom to be
handed up if and when requested by the Court. Unless otherwise
ordered, at the commencement of trial, an electronic set of trial exhibits
shall be presented to the Court and to opposing counsel. At the close of
evidence in a jury trial, a set of all admitted exhibits in electronic form,
together with an index, shall be prepared by the parties for the jury’s use
during deliberation. Counsel for each side is responsible for maintaining
custody of the side’s own exhibits at the conclusion of trial.
B. Witnesses. Ordinarily, trials and hearings continue from day to day
until completed. The Court will advise if a trial or hearing will be held
on a Friday (which is often reserved for motions and hearings in other
actions). A party is expected to have their next witness at the
Courthouse ready to testify immediately upon completion of a prior
witness’s testimony.
Other judges in S.D.N.Y.
- Stewart D. Aaron
- Ronnie Abrams
- Kim P. Berg
- Richard M. Berman
- Vincent L. Briccetti
- Vernon S. Broderick
- Naomi Reice Buchwald
- Valerie E. Caproni
- Andrew L. Carter Jr.
- Sarah L. Cave
- Jessica G. L. Clarke
- Denise L. Cote
- John P. Cronan
- Paul A. Crotty
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Katherine Polk Failla
- Valerie Figueredo
- Jesse M. Furman
- Paul G. Gardephe
- Margaret M. Garnett
- Gabriel W. Gorenstein
- Philip M. Halpern
- Alvin K. Hellerstein
- Dale E. Ho
- Lewis A. Kaplan
- Kenneth M. Karas
- John G. Koeltl
- Andrew E. Krause
- Robert W. Lehrburger
- Lewis J. Liman
- Victor Marrero
- Judith C. McCarthy
- Colleen McMahon
- Barbara Moses
- Alison J. Nathan
- Sarah Netburn
- J. Paul Oetken
- Katharine H. Parker
- Loretta A. Preska
- Jed S. Rakoff
- Edgardo Ramos
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Victoria Reznik
- Henry J. Ricardo
- Jennifer L. Rochon
- Nelson S. Roman
- Lorna G. Schofield
- Cathy Seibel
- Louis L. Stanton
- Gary Stein
- Sidney H. Stein
- Arun Subramanian
- Richard J. Sullivan
- Laura Taylor Swain
- Robyn F. Tarnofsky
- Analisa Torres
- Jeannette A. Vargas
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Ona T. Wang
- Jennifer E. Willis
- Kimba M. Wood
- Gregory H. Woods
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. P. Kevin Castel.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.