Hon. John G. Koeltl — Individual Rules of Practice

S.D.N.Y.

This judge's published rules are on file below; no quick-answer fields have been extracted yet.

No individual facts have been extracted from this page yet. The full published text is below, exactly as the court publishes it.

Full published rules for individual rules of practice

March 17, 2025

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE JOHN G. KOELTL

Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Koeltl, matters before Judge Koeltl shall be conducted

in accordance with the following practices:

I. Communications with Chambers

A. Letters. Except as otherwise provided below, communications with the Court

should be by letter, with copies simultaneously delivered to all counsel. Letters should be filed

electronically on ECF, unless there is a request to file a letter under seal or a letter contains

sensitive or confidential information. For instructions on how to file electronically under seal, see

Section 6 below. Courtesy copies are no longer accepted. Whether filed electronically or not,

letters may not exceed 3 pages in length. Letters solely between parties or their counsel or

otherwise not addressed to the Court may not be filed on ECF or otherwise sent to the Court

(except as exhibits to an otherwise properly filed document).

B. Docketing, Scheduling, and Calendar Matters. For docketing, scheduling and

calendar matters, call the Court Clerk, Mr. Don Fletcher at (212) 805-0107 between 9:00 A.M.

and 5:00 P.M.

C. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for adjournment

or extensions of time must be made in writing and filed on ECF as letter-motions. Courtesy copies

are no longer accepted. If a request contains sensitive or confidential information, it may be

submitted by fax or mail in lieu of being filed electronically. The letter- motion must state (1) the

original date, (2) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extension, (3) whether these

previous requests were granted or denied, and (4) whether the adversary consents, and, if not, the

reasons given by the adversary for refusing to consent. If the requested adjournment or extension

affects any other scheduled dates, a proposed Revised Scheduling Order (reflecting only business

days) must be attached. If the request is for an adjournment of a court appearance, absent an

emergency, it shall be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled appearance.

1

D. Letter-Motions. Letter-motions may be filed via ECF if they comply with the

S.D.N.Y. Local Rules and the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions. In

particular, all requests for adjournments, extensions, and pre-motion conferences (including pre-

motion conferences with respect to discovery disputes) should be filed as letter-motions. Courtesy

copies are no longer accepted. Letter-motions, together with any related exhibits, should not

exceed 3 pages in length.

E. Sentencing Submissions. Except for submissions to be filed under seal, every

document in a sentencing submission, including letters, must be filed on ECF. Parties should

assure that all sentencing submissions filed on ECF are redacted as necessary, and comply with

Rule 49.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Letters should be grouped and filed

together with attachments to a single document marked SENTENCING MEMORANDUM with

the caption and docket number clearly indicated. The defendant is responsible for filing all letters

submitted on behalf of the defendant, including those from friends and relatives. The Government

is responsible for filing all letters from victims. Courtesy copies of all sentencing submissions

should be provided to the Court promptly after they are filed. Unless otherwise ordered by the

Court, courtesy copies should be submitted via email to koeltlnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov.

F. Urgent Communications. As a general matter, materials filed via ECF are

reviewed by the Court the business day after they have been filed. If your submission requires

immediate attention, please notify Chambers by e-mail after you file via ECF.

II. Diversity Jurisdiction

A. Diversity in General. Where the Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction rests solely on

diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), the party invoking federal jurisdiction

should detail the citizenship of each party at the earliest possible opportunity.

B. LLCs, LPs, and LLPs. Where any of the parties is an LLC, LP, or LLP, the party

invoking federal jurisdiction should identify each member of every LLC, LP, or LLP, and detail

the citizenship of each member of every LLC, LP, or LLP at the earliest possible opportunity. See

Bayerische Landesbank, N.Y. Branch v. Aladdin Cap. Mgmt. LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d Cir.

2012); Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990).

C. Individual Parties. An individual’s citizenship, within the meaning of § 1332, is

determined by their domicile. Domicile is the place where a person has that person’s true fixed

home and principal establishment, and to which, whenever that person is absent, that person has

the intention of returning. At any given time, a person has but one domicile. See Palazzo ex rel.

Delmage v. Corio, 232 F.3d 38, 42 (2d Cir. 2000).

D. Corporate Parties. Within the meaning of § 1332, a corporation is considered a

citizen of (1) the state in which it is incorporated and (2) the state of its principal place of

business. Bayerische Landesbank, N.Y. Branch v. Aladdin Cap. Mgmt. LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d

Cir. 2012) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)).

2

III. Motions

A. Initial Pretrial Conferences. The parties are expected to confer with each other

pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before the initial conference with

the Court. The parties are expected to provide a Rule 26(f) report to the Court before the initial

conference.

B. Pre-Motion Conferences in Civil Cases. For discovery motions, follow Local

Civil Rule 37.2. For motions other than discovery motions, a pre-motion conference with the court

is required only before making a motion to dismiss, motion to amend or a motion for summary

judgment.

C. Courtesy Copies. The moving party should furnish to Chambers one courtesy

copies of all the motion papers (including papers in opposition to the motion) after the motion has

been fully briefed. Each submission related to the motion should be filed on the docket promptly

after service, but the full set of courtesy copies should be furnished to chambers only once the

motion is fully briefed. Courtesy copies of pleadings, marked as such, shall be submitted to

Chambers as soon as practicable after filing. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, courtesy

copies should be mailed to Chambers and submitted via email to

koeltlnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. The moving party should note that for documents that

are too lengthy to be stapled, the Court has a preference for binding on the side. Velo binding is

discouraged. Parties are encouraged to print declarations with lengthy exhibits double sided, but

memoranda of law should be single sided.

D. Memoranda of Law in Civil Cases. Unless prior permission has been granted,

memoranda of law in support of and in opposition to motions are limited to 7,000 words or fewer,

and reply memoranda are limited to 2,800 words or fewer. All memoranda shall contain a

certificate signed by counsel stating the number of words in the brief and certifying that the brief

complies with these formatting rules. All memoranda shall contain a table of contents and a table

of authorities. The cover page, certification of compliance, table of contents, and table of

authorities shall not be included in any word count. All memoranda should be double spaced, in

legible font, and with reasonable margins. All footnotes must be double spaced and in legible font.

Parties should not omit statements of facts from memoranda submitted in connection with

summary judgment motions; Local Rule 56.1 statements and supporting affidavits are not

substitutes for statements of facts and should not be incorporated by reference.

E. Memoranda of Law in Criminal Cases. There is no limitation with regard to

pages or words for memoranda of law in criminal cases.

F. Filing of Motion Papers. Motion papers shall be filed and served on ECF for all

ECF cases. In non-ECF cases, such as Social Security cases and cases in which there is a Pro Se

litigant, motion papers shall be filed in the Clerk’s Office promptly after service.

G. Oral Argument on Motions. Parties may request oral argument by letter at the

time their moving or opposing or reply papers are filed. The Court will determine whether

3

argument will be heard and, if so, will advise counsel of the argument date.

H. Motion Schedule. Unless otherwise stipulated by the Court, the schedule for

responses and replies to civil motions shall be that established by Local Civil Rule 6.1.

IV. Notice of Court Orders and Judgments

The Court will provide notice of entry of any order or judgment through the Electronic

Filing System for all ECF cases. The Court will no longer send facsimile copies of orders or

judgments, except in cases which are not ECF cases and in extraordinary circumstances. See

Paragraph 10 of the Southern District Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. It remains the duty of

the attorney for a party to review regularly the docket sheet of the case.

V. Pretrial Procedures

A. Joint Pretrial Orders

In accordance with the Scheduling Order adopted by the Court, in all civil cases,

the parties shall submit to the Court for its approval a joint pretrial order, which shall include the

following:

1. The full caption of the action.

2. The names, addresses (including firm names), and telephone and fax

numbers of trial counsel.

3. A brief statement by the plaintiff as to the basis of subject matter

jurisdiction and a brief statement by each other party as to the presence or

absence of subject matter jurisdiction. Such statements shall include

citations to all statutes relied on and relevant facts as to citizenship and

jurisdictional amount.

4. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that party has

asserted which remain to be tried, without recital of evidentiary matters but

including citations to all statutes relied on. Such summaries shall identify

all claims and defenses previously asserted which are not to be tried.

5. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or

without a jury, and the number of trial days needed.

6. A statement as to whether or not all parties have consented to trial of the

case by a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have

not so consented).

7. Any stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law which have been agreed

to by all parties.

4

8. A statement by each party as to the witnesses whose testimony is to be

offered in its case in chief, indicating whether such witnesses will testify in

person or by deposition.

9. A designation by each party of deposition testimony to be offered in its case

in chief, with any cross-designations and objections by any other party.

10. A list by each party of exhibits to be offered in its case in chief, with one

star indicating exhibits to which no party objects on grounds of authenticity,

and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any ground.

B. FLSA Actions

Parties in FLSA actions that are not collective actions should abide by the Initial

Discovery Protocols posted on the website at: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-g-koeltl

C. Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action

Parties in employment cases alleging adverse action should abide by the Initial

Discovery Protocols posted on the website at: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-g-koeltl

D. Filings Prior to Trial in Civil Cases

In accordance with the Scheduling Order adopted by the Court, in all civil cases,

each party shall submit prior to the date scheduled for trial:

1. in jury cases, requests to charge and proposed voir dire questions. When

feasible, proposed jury charges should also be submitted on a CD-ROM in

Word or WordPerfect format;

2. in non-jury cases, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law;

3. in all cases, motions addressing any evidentiary or other issues which

should be resolved in limine; and

4. in any case where a party believes it would be useful, a pretrial

memorandum.

VI. Criminal Procedures

A. Presentence Referral/Investigation

1. Defense counsel shall promptly schedule with the Probation Department a

Pre-Sentence interview of the defendant to occur within fourteen (14) days

after the date of the defendant’s guilty plea or verdict.

2. The Assistant United States Attorney shall submit the prosecution case

5

summary to the Probation Department within fourteen (14) days after the

date of the defendant’s guilty plea or verdict.

3. Within twenty-eight (28) days of the plea or verdict, the Probation

Department will complete its Pre-Sentence interview of the defendant or

notify the judge why it was unable to do so.

4. Fifty-five (55) days after the plea or verdict, the Probation Department will

make its initial disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report to the

parties.

5. Within fourteen (14) days of the initial disclosure, the parties must provide

the Probation Department with any objections to the Pre-Sentence

Investigation Report.

6. Twenty-eight (28) days after its initial disclosure, the Probation Department

will make its final disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report to

the parties; and,

7. The time-table for preparation and completion of Pre-Sentence

Investigation Reports is summarized as follows on the next page:

6

Action Date Completed

Guilty Plea or Verdict and Electronic Day 1

Notification to Probation

Pre-Sentence Investigation Interview Day 14

Scheduled and Prosecution Case

Summary Submitted

Pre-Sentence-Investigation Interview Day 28

Completed

Initial Disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Day 55

Investigation Report

Objections by the Parties Day 69

Final Disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Day 83

Investigation Report

B. Timetable for Sentencing Submissions to the Court

1. Defense submissions to the Court in connection with sentencing should be

submitted 14 days prior to the sentencing date.

2. The Government submissions to the Court in connection with sentencing

should be submitted 8 days prior to the sentencing date.

3. The defense and Government submissions should be filed on ECF after

redacting any personal identifying information and any other information

that may properly be redacted. The parties should provide the Court

courtesy copies of all sentencing submissions. The Court will file copies of

7

the parties’ submission in the record under seal along with the Pre-

Sentence Report after sentencing.

VII. Filings Under Seal

A. Electronic Filing Under Seal in Civil and Miscellaneous Cases

1. Sealing/Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 describes sensitive information that must be

redacted from public court filings without seeking prior permission from the Court. Such sensitive

information includes: Social Security numbers; names of minor children; dates of birth; and

financial account numbers.

Other information that should be treated with caution and may warrant a motion for approval of

sealed or redacted filing includes: personal identifying numbers (PIN numbers); medical records,

treatment and diagnosis; employment history; individual financial information; proprietary or

trade secret information; home addresses; and information regarding an individual’s cooperation

with the government.

Sensitive information and information requiring caution must not be included in any document

filed with the Court unless such inclusion is necessary and relevant to the case. If such

information must be included, personal identifiers must be partially redacted in accordance with

the above-cited rules and policies in order to protect any privacy interest.

2. Sealing/Redactions Requiring Court Approval.

Motions or Letter Motions for approval of sealed or redacted filings in civil and

miscellaneous cases and the subject documents, including the proposed sealed document(s), must

be filed electronically through the court’s ECF system in conformity with the court’s standing

order, 19-mc-00583, and ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6.

The motion must be filed in public view, must explain the particular reasons for

seeking to file that information under seal and should not include confidential information sought

to be filed under seal. Supporting papers must be separately filed electronically and may be filed

under seal or redacted only to the extent necessary to safeguard information sought to be filed

under seal.

8

The proposed sealed document must be contemporaneously filed under seal in the

ECF system and electronically related to the motion. The summary docket text, but not the sealed

document, will be open to public inspection and should not include confidential information sought

to be filed under seal. Where the motion seeks approval to redact information from a document

that is to be publicly filed, the filing party shall: (a) publicly file the document with the proposed

redactions, and (b) electronically file under seal a copy of the unredacted document with the

redactions highlighted. Both documents must be electronically filed through the ECF system and

related to the motion.

To be approved, any redaction or sealing of a court filing must be narrowly tailored

to serve whatever purpose justifies the redaction or sealing and must be otherwise consistent with

the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See, e.g., Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.

of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119–20 (2d Cir. 2006). In general, the parties’ consent or the fact that

information is subject to a confidentiality agreement between litigants is not, by itself, a valid basis

to overcome the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See, e.g., In re Gen.

Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litig., No. 14-MC-2543, 2015 WL 4750774, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.

11, 2015).

The party seeking leave to file sealed or redacted materials should meet and confer

with any opposing parties (or third parties seeking confidential treatment of the information, if

any) in advance to narrow the scope of the request. When a party seeks leave to file sealed or

redacted materials on the ground that an opposing party or third party has requested it, that party

shall notify the opposing party or third party that it must file, within three days, a letter explaining

the need to seal or redact the materials.

Any party unable to comply with the requirement for electronic filing under seal

through the ECF system, or who has reason to believe that a particular document should not be

electronically filed, must move for leave of the Court to file in the traditional manner, on paper.

VIII. Default Judgment Procedures

A. Remote Procedures

The plaintiff shall:

A. File a proposed Certificate of Default and supporting declarations on ECF

to obtain a Clerk’s Certificate of Default.

For the most up to date instructions, refer to Section 16.1 of the SDNY

Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions, available at:

https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions

9

B. After the Clerk’s Office issues a Certificate of Default, electronically file on

ECF the following documents:

1. A proposed Order to Show Cause;

2. An attorney’s affidavit stating why a default judgment is

appropriate; and

3. A proposed default judgment plus statement of damages.

C. The proposed Order to Show Cause should contain the following text:

“The defendants shall respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause for a

default judgment by . If the defendants fail to respond by that

date, judgment may be entered against them and the defendants will have

no trial. The plaintiff may reply by .

The plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause by

and shall file proof of service by .

No personal appearances are required in connection with this Order to

Show Cause.”

10

Updated by the court: not stated on the court's page
Checked by us: Oct. 9, 2026, 11:50 a.m.

Other judges in S.D.N.Y.

Read the court's own published rules for Hon. John G. Koeltl.

Compare across judges