Hon. John G. Koeltl — Individual Rules of Practice
S.D.N.Y.
This judge's published rules are on file below; no quick-answer fields have been extracted yet.
No individual facts have been extracted from this page yet. The full published text is below, exactly as the court publishes it.
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
March 17, 2025
INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE JOHN G. KOELTL
Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Koeltl, matters before Judge Koeltl shall be conducted
in accordance with the following practices:
I. Communications with Chambers
A. Letters. Except as otherwise provided below, communications with the Court
should be by letter, with copies simultaneously delivered to all counsel. Letters should be filed
electronically on ECF, unless there is a request to file a letter under seal or a letter contains
sensitive or confidential information. For instructions on how to file electronically under seal, see
Section 6 below. Courtesy copies are no longer accepted. Whether filed electronically or not,
letters may not exceed 3 pages in length. Letters solely between parties or their counsel or
otherwise not addressed to the Court may not be filed on ECF or otherwise sent to the Court
(except as exhibits to an otherwise properly filed document).
B. Docketing, Scheduling, and Calendar Matters. For docketing, scheduling and
calendar matters, call the Court Clerk, Mr. Don Fletcher at (212) 805-0107 between 9:00 A.M.
and 5:00 P.M.
C. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for adjournment
or extensions of time must be made in writing and filed on ECF as letter-motions. Courtesy copies
are no longer accepted. If a request contains sensitive or confidential information, it may be
submitted by fax or mail in lieu of being filed electronically. The letter- motion must state (1) the
original date, (2) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extension, (3) whether these
previous requests were granted or denied, and (4) whether the adversary consents, and, if not, the
reasons given by the adversary for refusing to consent. If the requested adjournment or extension
affects any other scheduled dates, a proposed Revised Scheduling Order (reflecting only business
days) must be attached. If the request is for an adjournment of a court appearance, absent an
emergency, it shall be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled appearance.
1
D. Letter-Motions. Letter-motions may be filed via ECF if they comply with the
S.D.N.Y. Local Rules and the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions. In
particular, all requests for adjournments, extensions, and pre-motion conferences (including pre-
motion conferences with respect to discovery disputes) should be filed as letter-motions. Courtesy
copies are no longer accepted. Letter-motions, together with any related exhibits, should not
exceed 3 pages in length.
E. Sentencing Submissions. Except for submissions to be filed under seal, every
document in a sentencing submission, including letters, must be filed on ECF. Parties should
assure that all sentencing submissions filed on ECF are redacted as necessary, and comply with
Rule 49.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Letters should be grouped and filed
together with attachments to a single document marked SENTENCING MEMORANDUM with
the caption and docket number clearly indicated. The defendant is responsible for filing all letters
submitted on behalf of the defendant, including those from friends and relatives. The Government
is responsible for filing all letters from victims. Courtesy copies of all sentencing submissions
should be provided to the Court promptly after they are filed. Unless otherwise ordered by the
Court, courtesy copies should be submitted via email to koeltlnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov.
F. Urgent Communications. As a general matter, materials filed via ECF are
reviewed by the Court the business day after they have been filed. If your submission requires
immediate attention, please notify Chambers by e-mail after you file via ECF.
II. Diversity Jurisdiction
A. Diversity in General. Where the Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction rests solely on
diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), the party invoking federal jurisdiction
should detail the citizenship of each party at the earliest possible opportunity.
B. LLCs, LPs, and LLPs. Where any of the parties is an LLC, LP, or LLP, the party
invoking federal jurisdiction should identify each member of every LLC, LP, or LLP, and detail
the citizenship of each member of every LLC, LP, or LLP at the earliest possible opportunity. See
Bayerische Landesbank, N.Y. Branch v. Aladdin Cap. Mgmt. LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d Cir.
2012); Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990).
C. Individual Parties. An individual’s citizenship, within the meaning of § 1332, is
determined by their domicile. Domicile is the place where a person has that person’s true fixed
home and principal establishment, and to which, whenever that person is absent, that person has
the intention of returning. At any given time, a person has but one domicile. See Palazzo ex rel.
Delmage v. Corio, 232 F.3d 38, 42 (2d Cir. 2000).
D. Corporate Parties. Within the meaning of § 1332, a corporation is considered a
citizen of (1) the state in which it is incorporated and (2) the state of its principal place of
business. Bayerische Landesbank, N.Y. Branch v. Aladdin Cap. Mgmt. LLC, 692 F.3d 42, 49 (2d
Cir. 2012) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)).
2
III. Motions
A. Initial Pretrial Conferences. The parties are expected to confer with each other
pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before the initial conference with
the Court. The parties are expected to provide a Rule 26(f) report to the Court before the initial
conference.
B. Pre-Motion Conferences in Civil Cases. For discovery motions, follow Local
Civil Rule 37.2. For motions other than discovery motions, a pre-motion conference with the court
is required only before making a motion to dismiss, motion to amend or a motion for summary
judgment.
C. Courtesy Copies. The moving party should furnish to Chambers one courtesy
copies of all the motion papers (including papers in opposition to the motion) after the motion has
been fully briefed. Each submission related to the motion should be filed on the docket promptly
after service, but the full set of courtesy copies should be furnished to chambers only once the
motion is fully briefed. Courtesy copies of pleadings, marked as such, shall be submitted to
Chambers as soon as practicable after filing. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, courtesy
copies should be mailed to Chambers and submitted via email to
koeltlnysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. The moving party should note that for documents that
are too lengthy to be stapled, the Court has a preference for binding on the side. Velo binding is
discouraged. Parties are encouraged to print declarations with lengthy exhibits double sided, but
memoranda of law should be single sided.
D. Memoranda of Law in Civil Cases. Unless prior permission has been granted,
memoranda of law in support of and in opposition to motions are limited to 7,000 words or fewer,
and reply memoranda are limited to 2,800 words or fewer. All memoranda shall contain a
certificate signed by counsel stating the number of words in the brief and certifying that the brief
complies with these formatting rules. All memoranda shall contain a table of contents and a table
of authorities. The cover page, certification of compliance, table of contents, and table of
authorities shall not be included in any word count. All memoranda should be double spaced, in
legible font, and with reasonable margins. All footnotes must be double spaced and in legible font.
Parties should not omit statements of facts from memoranda submitted in connection with
summary judgment motions; Local Rule 56.1 statements and supporting affidavits are not
substitutes for statements of facts and should not be incorporated by reference.
E. Memoranda of Law in Criminal Cases. There is no limitation with regard to
pages or words for memoranda of law in criminal cases.
F. Filing of Motion Papers. Motion papers shall be filed and served on ECF for all
ECF cases. In non-ECF cases, such as Social Security cases and cases in which there is a Pro Se
litigant, motion papers shall be filed in the Clerk’s Office promptly after service.
G. Oral Argument on Motions. Parties may request oral argument by letter at the
time their moving or opposing or reply papers are filed. The Court will determine whether
3
argument will be heard and, if so, will advise counsel of the argument date.
H. Motion Schedule. Unless otherwise stipulated by the Court, the schedule for
responses and replies to civil motions shall be that established by Local Civil Rule 6.1.
IV. Notice of Court Orders and Judgments
The Court will provide notice of entry of any order or judgment through the Electronic
Filing System for all ECF cases. The Court will no longer send facsimile copies of orders or
judgments, except in cases which are not ECF cases and in extraordinary circumstances. See
Paragraph 10 of the Southern District Procedures for Electronic Case Filing. It remains the duty of
the attorney for a party to review regularly the docket sheet of the case.
V. Pretrial Procedures
A. Joint Pretrial Orders
In accordance with the Scheduling Order adopted by the Court, in all civil cases,
the parties shall submit to the Court for its approval a joint pretrial order, which shall include the
following:
1. The full caption of the action.
2. The names, addresses (including firm names), and telephone and fax
numbers of trial counsel.
3. A brief statement by the plaintiff as to the basis of subject matter
jurisdiction and a brief statement by each other party as to the presence or
absence of subject matter jurisdiction. Such statements shall include
citations to all statutes relied on and relevant facts as to citizenship and
jurisdictional amount.
4. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that party has
asserted which remain to be tried, without recital of evidentiary matters but
including citations to all statutes relied on. Such summaries shall identify
all claims and defenses previously asserted which are not to be tried.
5. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or
without a jury, and the number of trial days needed.
6. A statement as to whether or not all parties have consented to trial of the
case by a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have
not so consented).
7. Any stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law which have been agreed
to by all parties.
4
8. A statement by each party as to the witnesses whose testimony is to be
offered in its case in chief, indicating whether such witnesses will testify in
person or by deposition.
9. A designation by each party of deposition testimony to be offered in its case
in chief, with any cross-designations and objections by any other party.
10. A list by each party of exhibits to be offered in its case in chief, with one
star indicating exhibits to which no party objects on grounds of authenticity,
and two stars indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any ground.
B. FLSA Actions
Parties in FLSA actions that are not collective actions should abide by the Initial
Discovery Protocols posted on the website at: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-g-koeltl
C. Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action
Parties in employment cases alleging adverse action should abide by the Initial
Discovery Protocols posted on the website at: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-g-koeltl
D. Filings Prior to Trial in Civil Cases
In accordance with the Scheduling Order adopted by the Court, in all civil cases,
each party shall submit prior to the date scheduled for trial:
1. in jury cases, requests to charge and proposed voir dire questions. When
feasible, proposed jury charges should also be submitted on a CD-ROM in
Word or WordPerfect format;
2. in non-jury cases, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law;
3. in all cases, motions addressing any evidentiary or other issues which
should be resolved in limine; and
4. in any case where a party believes it would be useful, a pretrial
memorandum.
VI. Criminal Procedures
A. Presentence Referral/Investigation
1. Defense counsel shall promptly schedule with the Probation Department a
Pre-Sentence interview of the defendant to occur within fourteen (14) days
after the date of the defendant’s guilty plea or verdict.
2. The Assistant United States Attorney shall submit the prosecution case
5
summary to the Probation Department within fourteen (14) days after the
date of the defendant’s guilty plea or verdict.
3. Within twenty-eight (28) days of the plea or verdict, the Probation
Department will complete its Pre-Sentence interview of the defendant or
notify the judge why it was unable to do so.
4. Fifty-five (55) days after the plea or verdict, the Probation Department will
make its initial disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report to the
parties.
5. Within fourteen (14) days of the initial disclosure, the parties must provide
the Probation Department with any objections to the Pre-Sentence
Investigation Report.
6. Twenty-eight (28) days after its initial disclosure, the Probation Department
will make its final disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report to
the parties; and,
7. The time-table for preparation and completion of Pre-Sentence
Investigation Reports is summarized as follows on the next page:
6
Action Date Completed
Guilty Plea or Verdict and Electronic Day 1
Notification to Probation
Pre-Sentence Investigation Interview Day 14
Scheduled and Prosecution Case
Summary Submitted
Pre-Sentence-Investigation Interview Day 28
Completed
Initial Disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Day 55
Investigation Report
Objections by the Parties Day 69
Final Disclosure of the Pre-Sentence Day 83
Investigation Report
B. Timetable for Sentencing Submissions to the Court
1. Defense submissions to the Court in connection with sentencing should be
submitted 14 days prior to the sentencing date.
2. The Government submissions to the Court in connection with sentencing
should be submitted 8 days prior to the sentencing date.
3. The defense and Government submissions should be filed on ECF after
redacting any personal identifying information and any other information
that may properly be redacted. The parties should provide the Court
courtesy copies of all sentencing submissions. The Court will file copies of
7
the parties’ submission in the record under seal along with the Pre-
Sentence Report after sentencing.
VII. Filings Under Seal
A. Electronic Filing Under Seal in Civil and Miscellaneous Cases
1. Sealing/Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 describes sensitive information that must be
redacted from public court filings without seeking prior permission from the Court. Such sensitive
information includes: Social Security numbers; names of minor children; dates of birth; and
financial account numbers.
Other information that should be treated with caution and may warrant a motion for approval of
sealed or redacted filing includes: personal identifying numbers (PIN numbers); medical records,
treatment and diagnosis; employment history; individual financial information; proprietary or
trade secret information; home addresses; and information regarding an individual’s cooperation
with the government.
Sensitive information and information requiring caution must not be included in any document
filed with the Court unless such inclusion is necessary and relevant to the case. If such
information must be included, personal identifiers must be partially redacted in accordance with
the above-cited rules and policies in order to protect any privacy interest.
2. Sealing/Redactions Requiring Court Approval.
Motions or Letter Motions for approval of sealed or redacted filings in civil and
miscellaneous cases and the subject documents, including the proposed sealed document(s), must
be filed electronically through the court’s ECF system in conformity with the court’s standing
order, 19-mc-00583, and ECF Rules & Instructions, section 6.
The motion must be filed in public view, must explain the particular reasons for
seeking to file that information under seal and should not include confidential information sought
to be filed under seal. Supporting papers must be separately filed electronically and may be filed
under seal or redacted only to the extent necessary to safeguard information sought to be filed
under seal.
8
The proposed sealed document must be contemporaneously filed under seal in the
ECF system and electronically related to the motion. The summary docket text, but not the sealed
document, will be open to public inspection and should not include confidential information sought
to be filed under seal. Where the motion seeks approval to redact information from a document
that is to be publicly filed, the filing party shall: (a) publicly file the document with the proposed
redactions, and (b) electronically file under seal a copy of the unredacted document with the
redactions highlighted. Both documents must be electronically filed through the ECF system and
related to the motion.
To be approved, any redaction or sealing of a court filing must be narrowly tailored
to serve whatever purpose justifies the redaction or sealing and must be otherwise consistent with
the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See, e.g., Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.
of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119–20 (2d Cir. 2006). In general, the parties’ consent or the fact that
information is subject to a confidentiality agreement between litigants is not, by itself, a valid basis
to overcome the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See, e.g., In re Gen.
Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litig., No. 14-MC-2543, 2015 WL 4750774, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.
11, 2015).
The party seeking leave to file sealed or redacted materials should meet and confer
with any opposing parties (or third parties seeking confidential treatment of the information, if
any) in advance to narrow the scope of the request. When a party seeks leave to file sealed or
redacted materials on the ground that an opposing party or third party has requested it, that party
shall notify the opposing party or third party that it must file, within three days, a letter explaining
the need to seal or redact the materials.
Any party unable to comply with the requirement for electronic filing under seal
through the ECF system, or who has reason to believe that a particular document should not be
electronically filed, must move for leave of the Court to file in the traditional manner, on paper.
VIII. Default Judgment Procedures
A. Remote Procedures
The plaintiff shall:
A. File a proposed Certificate of Default and supporting declarations on ECF
to obtain a Clerk’s Certificate of Default.
For the most up to date instructions, refer to Section 16.1 of the SDNY
Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions, available at:
https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions
9
B. After the Clerk’s Office issues a Certificate of Default, electronically file on
ECF the following documents:
1. A proposed Order to Show Cause;
2. An attorney’s affidavit stating why a default judgment is
appropriate; and
3. A proposed default judgment plus statement of damages.
C. The proposed Order to Show Cause should contain the following text:
“The defendants shall respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause for a
default judgment by . If the defendants fail to respond by that
date, judgment may be entered against them and the defendants will have
no trial. The plaintiff may reply by .
The plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause by
and shall file proof of service by .
No personal appearances are required in connection with this Order to
Show Cause.”
10
Other judges in S.D.N.Y.
- Stewart D. Aaron
- Ronnie Abrams
- Kim P. Berg
- Richard M. Berman
- Vincent L. Briccetti
- Vernon S. Broderick
- Naomi Reice Buchwald
- Valerie E. Caproni
- Andrew L. Carter Jr.
- P. Kevin Castel
- Sarah L. Cave
- Jessica G. L. Clarke
- Denise L. Cote
- John P. Cronan
- Paul A. Crotty
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Katherine Polk Failla
- Valerie Figueredo
- Jesse M. Furman
- Paul G. Gardephe
- Margaret M. Garnett
- Gabriel W. Gorenstein
- Philip M. Halpern
- Alvin K. Hellerstein
- Dale E. Ho
- Lewis A. Kaplan
- Kenneth M. Karas
- Andrew E. Krause
- Robert W. Lehrburger
- Lewis J. Liman
- Victor Marrero
- Judith C. McCarthy
- Colleen McMahon
- Barbara Moses
- Alison J. Nathan
- Sarah Netburn
- J. Paul Oetken
- Katharine H. Parker
- Loretta A. Preska
- Jed S. Rakoff
- Edgardo Ramos
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Victoria Reznik
- Henry J. Ricardo
- Jennifer L. Rochon
- Nelson S. Roman
- Lorna G. Schofield
- Cathy Seibel
- Louis L. Stanton
- Gary Stein
- Sidney H. Stein
- Arun Subramanian
- Richard J. Sullivan
- Laura Taylor Swain
- Robyn F. Tarnofsky
- Analisa Torres
- Jeannette A. Vargas
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Ona T. Wang
- Jennifer E. Willis
- Kimba M. Wood
- Gregory H. Woods
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. John G. Koeltl.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.