Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger — Individual Rules of Practice
S.D.N.Y.
Courtroom: 500
What Robert W. Lehrburger's rules say, in the court's own words
Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.
Which courtroom hears this part?
500
“Chambers Courtroom 500 Pearl Street, Room 1960 500 Pearl Street, Room 18D”
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
As of September 30, 2025
INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES
ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Chambers Courtroom
500 Pearl Street, Room 1960 500 Pearl Street, Room 18D
United States Courthouse United States Courthouse
New York, NY 10007 Southern District of New York
Tel: (212) 805-0248 New York, New York 10007
Lehrburger_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov Deputy Clerk: Ms. Rupa Shah
Introduction
Cases come before magistrate judges in one of two ways: for specific purposes pursuant
to an order of reference by the assigned district judge, or, for all purposes on consent of
the parties. Consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge has a number of benefits,
including ready access to the judge and a reliable trial date calendared well in advance.
The reason for this is that magistrate judge dockets have few criminal cases, which
otherwise take precedence over civil proceedings and trials. Prior to taking the bench in
2017, Judge Lehrburger litigated and tried a wide range of cases for 27 years and well
understands the concerns of civil litigation attorneys and their clients. If counsel jointly
wish to consent to have Judge Lehrburger hear their case for all purposes, the necessary
form is at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-robert-w-lehrburger.
Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Lehrburger, matters before him, whether for all
purposes or by specific reference, shall comply with the following practices.
1
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
I. Communications with Chambers
A. Letters. In general, communications with the Court should be by letter.
Except as provided below, all letters should be filed electronically on ECF
(i.e., Electronic Case Filing), without email or other copy to Chambers.
1. Represented Parties. The following types of letters should be
emailed to Chambers as a .pdf attachment:
● Letters filed by counsel under seal;
● Ex parte settlement letters;
● Letters otherwise containing confidential information.
In pro se cases, unless the pro se party has filed a fully executed
Consent To Electronic Service form, counsel for the represented
party must serve the pro se party with a paper copy of any legal
document that is filed on ECF or emailed to the Court and must
separately file proof of service.
2. Unrepresented Pro Se Parties. By Standing Order, a pro se party
must mail or email all communications with the Court to the Pro Se
Intake Unit located at 500 Pearl Street, Room 200, New York, NY
10007, ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov. A pro se party may not call
Chambers or send any document or filing directly to Chambers.
Unless the Court orders otherwise, all communications with the Court
will be docketed upon receipt; such docketing shall constitute service
on any user of the ECF system. If any additional unrepresented party
has not filed a fully executed Consent To Electronic Service form, a
pro se party must mail or deliver copies of any filing to that party and
include proof of service affirming that he or she has done so. Copies
of correspondence between a pro se party and opposing parties
should not be sent to the Court.
Any non-incarcerated pro se party who wishes to participate in
electronic case filing (“ECF”) must file a Motion for Permission for
Electronic Case Filing, available in the Pro Se Intake Unit or at
https://nysd.uscourts.gov/prose. Any non-incarcerated pro se party
who wishes to receive documents in their case by email instead of
by regular mail may consent to electronic service by filing a Pro Se
(Non-prisoner) Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents
Electronically, available in the Pro Se Intake Unit or at
https://nysd.uscourts.gov/prose.
2
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
3. Page Limit for Letters. Letters may not exceed 3 single-space
pages in length (exclusive of exhibits).
4. Letters Between Parties. Letters solely between parties or their
counsel or otherwise not addressed to the Court may not be filed on
ECF or otherwise sent to the Court (except as exhibits to an
otherwise properly filed document).
B. Hand Deliveries. Hand-delivered mail should be left with the Court Security
Officers at the Worth Street entrance of 500 Pearl Street and may not be
brought directly to Chambers. If the hand-delivered letter is urgent and
requires immediate attention, ask the Court Security Officers to notify
Chambers that an urgent package has arrived.
C. Telephone Calls: For administrative, scheduling, and calendar matters
that do not request a ruling from the Court, Chambers may be called
between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
D. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for
adjournments or extensions of time must be filed on ECF as letter motions.
The letter motion must state: (i) the originally scheduled due date(s); (ii) the
number of previous requests for adjournment or extension of the matter at
issue; (iii) whether those previous requests were granted or denied; and (iv)
whether all parties consent, and if not, the reasons given for refusing to
consent. If the adjournment concerns a conference to be rescheduled, the
letter motion must also provide multiple dates when all counsel are
available. Absent good cause, any request for extension or adjournment
shall be made at least 48 hours before the deadline or scheduled
appearance.
E. ECF. In accordance with the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and
Instructions, counsel are required to register as ECF filers and to enter an
appearance in the case. Instructions are available on the Court website, at
https://nysd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing. Counsel are responsible
for checking the docket sheet regularly, regardless of whether they receive
an ECF notification of case activity. For questions about ECF rules and
procedures, contact the ECF help desk at (212) 805-0800.
II. Case Management and Discovery
A. Initial Case Management Conference. The Court will issue an order
scheduling the initial case management conference. The parties must meet
and confer and then file a joint Report of Rule 26(f) Conference and
Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order no later than one
week before the initial case management conference. The parties should
3
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
use the template form for the Report of Rule 26(f) Conference and Proposed
Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order available at:
https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-robert-w-lehrburger. In pro se cases, if
attempts to meet and confer are unsuccessful or not feasible, then each
party may submit their own Report and Proposed Case Management Plan
and Scheduling Order.
Lead counsel for the parties are expected to attend the Initial Case
Management Conference. In most instances, the Initial Pretrial Conference
will be held remotely, although the Court may order otherwise.
B. Electronic Discovery. The parties are encouraged to use the model Joint
Electronic Discovery Submission and Proposed Order found at
https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-robert-w-lehrburger.
C. Confidentiality Stipulations and Orders. In cases where confidential
information will be exchanged, the parties may submit a proposed
confidentiality stipulation and order. Any such proposed stipulation and
order must adopt by reference, or contain provisions consistent with, the
procedures governing Redactions and Filings Under Seal set forth as the
Appendix to these Rules.
If a party expects to have responsive discovery material they deem
confidential, they must proceed promptly with proposing the terms of a
confidentiality stipulation and order, and all parties must negotiate the terms
in good faith so that the absence of a confidentiality stipulation and order
does not delay production of discovery material.
D. Discovery Disputes. Parties shall follow S.D.N.Y. Local Rule 37.2 with the
following modifications. Any party wishing to raise a discovery dispute with
the Court must first meet and confer in good faith with the opposing party,
in person or by telephone or video conferencing, in an effort to resolve the
dispute. If this meet-and-confer process does not resolve the dispute, the
party may file a letter motion with the Court or, if applicable, to the Pro Se
Intake Clerk, no longer than 3 single-space pages, explaining the nature of
the dispute and requesting a conference. Such letter must include a
representation that the meet-and-confer process occurred, including when
and whether it was in person or over the telephone. Any responsive letter
should be submitted within 3 business days following submission of the
letter motion. The Court retains discretion to rule on the dispute based on
the parties’ letter submissions, without more formal briefing, and with or
without a conference. If any party believes that more formal briefing is
warranted, that party must make a separate application to the court
explaining why more formal briefing is warranted.
4
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
Parties shall keep in mind Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
which requires the Court and the parties to construe, administer, and
employ the rules of procedure to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive
determination of every action. Parties also shall keep in mind Rule 26(b)(1)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that “[p]arties may
obtain discovery regarding any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any
party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case,
considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount
in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the
parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues,
and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs
its likely benefit.” Discovery motions should address these rules to the
extent applicable.
III. Motions
A. All motions and moving papers filed on ECF or emailed to chambers shall
be in searchable PDF form.
B. Letter Motions. Letter motions should be filed via ECF and comply with
the S.D.N.Y. Local Rules and the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and
Instructions. Letter motions are limited to 3 single-space pages (not
including exhibits). Any responsive letter should be submitted within 3
business days following submission of the letter motion. Parties must file
as letter motions the following:
• Requests for adjournments or extensions of time;
• Requests for pre-motion conferences;
• Requests for a settlement conference;
• Discovery disputes, unless permission is granted for more formal
briefing.
C. Motions Under Rule 12(b) or (c). Except in cases involving pro se parties,
if a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) or 12(c) is contemplated, the
moving party must so inform the plaintiff or counterclaimant and explain the
basis for the anticipated motion. The plaintiff or counterclaimant must then
indicate whether they wish to amend the subject pleading before motion
practice, and the parties must consider in good faith a stipulation permitting
such amendment. If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, the moving
party shall include the following statement in the notice of motion: “This
motion is made following the conference of counsel, which took place on
[date]. Plaintiff [or Counter-Claimant] declined an opportunity to amend.”
5
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
D. Pre-Motion Conferences. For motions concerning discovery disputes, see
Section II.D above. A pre-motion conference with the Court is required for
all other motions except for (i) motions by incarcerated pro se litigants, (ii)
motions for reconsideration, (iii) motions for a new trial, (iv) motions in
limine, and (v) motions required by the Federal Rules of Appellate
Procedure or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to be made by a time
certain.
Letters requesting a pre-motion conference should summarize the basis of
the motion and may not exceed 3 pages single-spaced. Within 3 business
days following submission of the requesting letter, each opposing party may
submit a written response of no more than 3 pages. For non-dispositive
motions, the Court retains discretion to rule on the dispute based on the
parties’ letter submissions, without more formal briefing, and with or without
a conference. If any party believes that more formal briefing is warranted,
that party must make a separate application to the court explaining why
more formal briefing is warranted. The filing of a request for a pre-motion
conference to dismiss prior to filing an Answer stays the time for filing an
Answer until after the motion is resolved or further order of the Court,
whichever is earlier.
E. Memoranda of Law. The typeface, text size, margins, and line-spacing of
motion papers must conform to S.D.N.Y. Local Civil Rule 7.1. As to length,
parties must also adhere to the word-count limits of Local Civil Rule 7.1 and
include the required certification. Memoranda of 10 or more pages must
contain a table of contents and a table of authorities, neither of which shall
count against the limits on length. Sur-reply memoranda will not be
accepted without prior permission of the Court. When citing unreported
cases, parties shall use Westlaw citations whenever feasible.
F. Courtesy Copies. The Court does not require courtesy copies.
G. Redactions and Filing Under Seal. The parties must adhere to the
procedures set forth in the Appendix to these Rules.
H. Oral Argument. Requests for oral argument of motions should be made by
letter. Whether oral argument will be held remains in the Court’s discretion.
In some instances, the Court may hold oral argument even if the parties
have not requested it.
I. Specific Time Periods Provided by Federal Rules. Nothing in the Court’s
Individual Practices supersedes a specific time period for filing a motion
specified by statute or Federal Rule – including but not limited to Fed. R.
Civ. P 50, 52, 54, 59, and 60, and Fed. R. App. P. 4 – where failure to
6
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
comply with the specified time period could result in forfeiture of a
substantive right.
IV. Settlement Procedures
See Settlement Procedures For Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger, posted
at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-robert-w-lehrburger.
V. Pretrial Procedures
The following procedures apply to those cases where the parties have consented
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) to have all proceedings, including trial, before Judge
Lehrburger. Absent such consent, the parties should refer to the individual
practices of the district judge.
A. Joint Pretrial Orders in Civil Cases.
1. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, within 30 days after the date
for the completion of discovery in a civil case or, if a dispositive
motion has been filed, within 30 days after a decision resolving the
motion, the parties shall jointly prepare and file with the court for its
approval a Proposed Pretrial Order.
2. In appropriate cases, the Court may be willing to dispense with
portions of the Pretrial Order, if both sides consent, in order to secure
the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action. See
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1. The parties should discuss such
requests with each other and then with the Court sufficiently in
advance so that the Proposed Pretrial Order will be filed within the
time frames described above.
B. Contents of the Proposed Pretrial Order.
1. Caption: The full caption of the action.
2. Counsel: The name, address, telephone number and email of each
principal member of the trial team, and identification of each party’s
lead trial counsel.
3. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: A brief statement identifying the basis
for subject matter jurisdiction, and, if that jurisdiction is disputed, the
reasons therefore. Such statement shall include citations to all
statutes relied on and, where diversity is the basis for jurisdiction,
relevant facts as to citizenship and jurisdictional amount.
7
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
4. Claims and Defenses: A list of each claim and defense that will be
tried and a list of any claims and defenses asserted in the pleadings
that are not to be tried. Where applicable, the statements shall
identify citations to relevant statutes relied on.
5. Law: Identification of the governing law for each claim and defense
that will be tried and a brief description of any dispute regarding
choice of law.
6. Damages: With respect to each claim remaining to be tried, a
statement and calculation of the damages claimed, broken down by
element or category (e.g., lost profits, back wages, medical costs,
etc.), and a description of any other relief sought.
7. Length of Trial: The number of days estimated for trial. If the parties
do not agree, each party shall give its estimate and the basis for that
estimate.
8. Fact-Finder: Whether the case is to be tried with or without a jury. If
a jury trial, whether the parties agree to a non-unanimous verdict
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 48.
9. Stipulations: Any agreed-upon stipulations of fact or law.
10. Openings: Requested amount of time for opening statements.
11. Witness Lists: A list by each party of its trial witnesses that it, in
good faith, expects to present on its case in chief, with a statement
of the general subject areas of the witness’s testimony and an
indication of whether the witnesses will testify in person or by
deposition. The witness lists shall also include identification of
rebuttal witnesses that the party may call if needed. Absent good
cause, a party will not be allowed to present a witness not previously
identified on their witness list.
12. Witness Order: A statement as to how and when the parties will give
notice to each other of the order of their trial witnesses.
13. Depositions: Designation by each party of deposition testimony to
be offered in its case, referencing page numbers, with any cross-
designations and objections by any other party. If there is no
objection or cross-designation, the Court will deem the opposing
party to have waived any such objection or cross-designation.
8
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
14. Exhibits: A list by each party of exhibits to be offered in its case. For
any exhibit as to which there is an objection, the party objecting must
briefly specify, next to the listing for that exhibit, the nature of the
party’s objection (e.g., “authenticity,” “hearsay,” “Rule 403”). Any
objection not listed shall be deemed waived. Exhibits not produced
during discovery or otherwise provided to other parties prior to trial
likely will not be allowed for any purpose.
15. Demonstratives: A proposed schedule by which the parties will
exchange demonstratives the parties intend to use at trial, notify
each other of any objections thereto, consult with each other about
those objections, and notify the Court of any remaining disputes.
16. Other Issues: All other matters that the Court may have ordered or
that the parties believe are important to the efficient conduct of the
trial, such as bifurcation or sequencing of issues to be tried.
C. Additional Pretrial Filings in Civil Cases. Unless otherwise ordered by
the Court, the following shall be filed at the same time as the proposed joint
pretrial order:
1. Jury Cases.
a. Each party must file a Trial Memorandum of Law addressing
each issue of law that the party expects to arise at or before
trial.
b. The parties must jointly prepare and submit proposed Jury
Materials consisting of:
● a succinct statement of the case to be read to the
jury panel before voir dire and as an introduction to
jury instructions;
● proposed voir dire questions for prospective jurors;
● proposed jury instructions (with each instruction
separately numbered and beginning on a separate
page); and
● a proposed verdict form.
c. To the extent a party objects to another party’s requested voir
dire questions, jury instructions, or proposed verdict form, that
party must (i) set forth the grounds for the objection and (ii) if
9
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
applicable, propose an alternative (all in the same document
so that the Court can compare the parties’ respective
proposals).
d. All substantive jury instructions, objections, and alternative
proposals must include citation to supporting authority.
e. In addition to ECF-filing voir dire questions, requests to
charge, and verdict sheets, electronic copies must also be
submitted as Microsoft Word documents and sent by email to:
Lehrburger_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov.
2. Non-Jury Cases.
a. Each party must file a Trial Memorandum of Law identifying
the issues, summarizing facts and applicable law, and
addressing any evidentiary issues.
b. The Court may also ask each party to file Proposed Findings
of Fact and Conclusions of Law before or after trial.
c. In addition to ECF-filing, these materials should also be
submitted as Microsoft Word documents and sent via email
to: Lehrburger_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov.
D. Motions in Limine. Each party shall file and serve any motions in limine
at the same time as the proposed pretrial order. Within two weeks
thereafter, each party shall file and serve its opposition to any motion in
limine. There shall be no replies unless requested by the Court.
E. Exhibit Binders. At least two weeks in advance of trial, counsel must
provide two courtesy sets of pre-marked exhibits to the Court. The exhibits
should be assembled sequentially in a tabbed 3-ring binder. Voluminous
exhibits may be provided on a thumb drive or equivalent.
F. Pro Se Cases. In pro se cases,, unless otherwise ordered, the parties are
not required to prepare joint pretrial filings (but may do so jointly if feasible).
Instead, within 30 days from the date for completion of discovery or, if a
dispositive motion has been filed, within 30 days of a decision resolving the
motion, the represented party(ies) shall submit the pretrial materials set
forth in sections V.A, B, C, and D above. At that same time, the pro se party
shall file a Pretrial Statement. The pro se party’s Pretrial Statement need
take no particular form, but must be concise and contain:
10
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
1. a statement of the facts the party hopes to prove at trial;
2. a list of all documents or other physical objects that the party plans
to put into evidence at trial; and
3. a list of the names and addresses of all witnesses the party intends
to have testify at trial and the general subject matter of each
witness’s expected testimony.
The Pretrial Statement must be sworn or affirmed by the pro se party to be
true and accurate based on the facts known by the party. The pro se party
must file an original Pretrial Statement with the Pro Se Office and serve a
copy on all other parties or their counsel if represented.
VI. Trial Procedures
A. Voir Dire. The Court will conduct all voir dire.
B. Time.
1. The Court encourages use of timed trials, with each party allotted a
set amount of time for presentation of all evidence and cross-
examination, and such time to be allotted as that party chooses.
2. Trial days generally run from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., with a one-hour
lunch break, and brief mid-morning and mid-afternoon breaks.
C. Witnesses.
1. No later than the end of each trial day, counsel must notify each other
and the Court of witnesses to be called the following trial day. The
parties may agree to earlier notification.
2. Absent a contrary ruling made before the start of a witness’s direct
testimony, where applicable, cross-examination in a civil case may
go beyond the scope of direct to avoid making the witness return to
testify in the opposing party’s case. However, to the extent cross-
examination exceeds the scope of the direct pursuant to this rule,
counsel should not ask leading questions (unless the witness is
hostile or otherwise associated with the opposing party).
3. The parties are expected to have witnesses available to fill the
entirety of each trial day. Witnesses may be taken out of order if the
next planned witness is unavailable. If a party does not have a
11
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
witness available to testify, the Court may preclude testimony or
deem that party to have rested.
D. Exhibits.
1. All objections to exhibits should be resolved in advance of trial with
the pretrial order and motions in limine. Exhibits shall be pre-marked.
As all objections will have been resolved, any exhibit used with a
witness during trial shall be deemed admitted, and counsel need not
establish foundational elements for that exhibit.
2. Counsel must make sure that all exhibits are redacted in compliance
with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. If there is a particular need
not to redact, the party seeking to introduce the exhibit must file a
motion in limine with the Court.
3. Counsel are responsible for maintaining custody of all original
exhibits. The Court does not retain them, and the Courtroom Deputy
is not responsible for them.
E. Court Reporter.
1. Prior to trial, counsel shall provide the court reporter with spelling of
proper names, places, scientific or medical terms, and other words
peculiar to the case that are likely to arise during trial.
2. When reading from depositions or documents, the reader cite the
applicable page and line number.
3. When referring to an exhibit, counsel shall cite it by number or letter
so that the record is clear as to what is being discussed.
4. Counsel and witnesses shall speak slowly and clearly enough for the
court reporter to record what is being said
F. Objections and Sidebars.
1. Counsel shall object concisely, (e.g., “Objection”; “Objection, calls for
speculation”), unless the Court requests further explanation.
2. Sidebars during jury trials are to be avoided. Counsel are expected
to anticipate any problems and raise those issues with the Court in
advance of the time the jury will be present to hear evidence.
* * *
12
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
APPENDIX
RULES FOR REDACTIONS AND FILING UNDER SEAL
A. Sealing/Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval. Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 5.2 describes sensitive information that must be redacted from
public court filings. No Court approval is required for these redactions.
B. Sealing/Redactions Requiring Court Approval.
1. Initial Filing Process. Any party wishing to file a document under
seal or in redacted form shall (1) file on ECF a redacted copy of the
document, (2) file on ECF a sealed copy of the document, and (3)
submit to Chambers an unredacted copy by email.
2. Service On Parties. Pursuant to S.D.N.Y. Standing Order M10-468,
sealed documents are not accessible or viewable on ECF;
accordingly, parties must separately serve opposing counsel with
any sealed materials in a manner other than the ECF system.
3. Meet and Confer Requirement. Within 5 business days of the ECF-
filing of the redacted document(s), the parties must confer in good
faith as to whether any or all of the redacted material may or must be
filed without redaction. If the parties reach agreement that all
redacted material may or must be unredacted, the parties shall file
on ECF unredacted copies of the previously redacted documents
and so inform the Court.
4. When Motion Required. A motion is required whenever one or more
parties seek to maintain sealed material. If the parties cannot agree
to unredact all redacted material, then, within 3 business days of the
parties’ meet and confer, the party seeking to preserve confidentiality
must make a specific request to the Court by letter motion. If more
than one party seeks to preserve confidentiality, the parties shall
confer and submit a joint letter. Any party opposing the request to
file under seal must submit a responding letter within 3 business days
after submission of the letter by the party seeking to preserve
confidentiality.
5. What Must Be Included In Motion. Any letter motion requesting
that material remain under seal must explain the reasons for seeking
to file the material under seal and address the request in light of the
13
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
Court of Appeals’ opinions in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga,
435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and Bernstein v. Bernstein Litowitz
Berger & Grossman LLP, 814 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2016). Any sealing
request shall include the requesting party’s proposed redactions.
6. Motion Filing Process. The letter motion to seal (and any
response) must be filed on ECF in public view and should not itself
include confidential material for which sealing is sought. Any
supporting papers or attachments that contain confidential material
may be filed under seal or redacted to the extent necessary to
safeguard that information. At the time the letter motion is filed it
should be designated as related to the documents filed under seal in
the initial filing process.
7. Unredaction. If the Court directs that any previously redacted
material be unredacted, the party who submitted the previously
redacted document shall, within 3 business days after the Court’s
unredaction order, file on ECF the documents complying with the
Court’s order.
8. Inability to Comply. Any party unable to comply with the
requirement for electronic filing under seal through the ECF system,
or who has reason to believe that a particular document should not
be electronically filed, must move by letter motion for leave of Court
to file non-electronically.
14
Lehrburger Individual Rules 2025.9.30
Other judges in S.D.N.Y.
- Stewart D. Aaron
- Ronnie Abrams
- Kim P. Berg
- Richard M. Berman
- Vincent L. Briccetti
- Vernon S. Broderick
- Naomi Reice Buchwald
- Valerie E. Caproni
- Andrew L. Carter Jr.
- P. Kevin Castel
- Sarah L. Cave
- Jessica G. L. Clarke
- Denise L. Cote
- John P. Cronan
- Paul A. Crotty
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Katherine Polk Failla
- Valerie Figueredo
- Jesse M. Furman
- Paul G. Gardephe
- Margaret M. Garnett
- Gabriel W. Gorenstein
- Philip M. Halpern
- Alvin K. Hellerstein
- Dale E. Ho
- Lewis A. Kaplan
- Kenneth M. Karas
- John G. Koeltl
- Andrew E. Krause
- Lewis J. Liman
- Victor Marrero
- Judith C. McCarthy
- Colleen McMahon
- Barbara Moses
- Alison J. Nathan
- Sarah Netburn
- J. Paul Oetken
- Katharine H. Parker
- Loretta A. Preska
- Jed S. Rakoff
- Edgardo Ramos
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Victoria Reznik
- Henry J. Ricardo
- Jennifer L. Rochon
- Nelson S. Roman
- Lorna G. Schofield
- Cathy Seibel
- Louis L. Stanton
- Gary Stein
- Sidney H. Stein
- Arun Subramanian
- Richard J. Sullivan
- Laura Taylor Swain
- Robyn F. Tarnofsky
- Analisa Torres
- Jeannette A. Vargas
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Ona T. Wang
- Jennifer E. Willis
- Kimba M. Wood
- Gregory H. Woods
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.