Hon. Jesse M. Furman — Individual Rules of Practice
S.D.N.Y.
Courtroom: 2510
What Jesse M. Furman's rules say, in the court's own words
Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.
Which courtroom hears this part?
2510
“500 Pearl Street, Room 2510”
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES
Jesse M. Furman, United States District Judge
Chambers Courtroom Deputy
United States District Court Alexandra Smallman
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Room 2510
New York, NY 10007
Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, these Individual Rules apply to all civil matters
before Judge Furman except for civil pro se cases (see Individual Rules and Practices in
Civil Pro Se Cases, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman).
1. Guidelines for All Submissions ............................................................................................ 2
A. Text Searchable Submissions ........................................................................................... 2
B. Amended or Corrected Filings .......................................................................................... 2
C. Submission of Large Electronic Files ............................................................................... 2
D. No Courtesy Copies .......................................................................................................... 2
2. Communications with Chambers ........................................................................................ 3
A. Letters ............................................................................................................................... 3
B. Telephone Calls and Emails .............................................................................................. 3
C. Hand Deliveries ................................................................................................................ 3
D. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time .......................................................... 3
E. Related and Consolidated Cases ....................................................................................... 4
F. ECF ................................................................................................................................. 4
G. Urgent Communications ................................................................................................... 4
3. Conferences ........................................................................................................................... 4
A. In-Person Conferences ...................................................................................................... 4
B. Teleconferences ................................................................................................................ 4
C. Attendance by Principal Trial Counsel ............................................................................. 5
D. Discovery Disputes ........................................................................................................... 5
E. Participation by Junior Attorneys ..................................................................................... 5
4. Motions................................................................................................................................... 6
A. Letter-Motions .................................................................................................................. 6
B. Pre-Motion Conferences in Civil Cases ............................................................................ 6
C. Memoranda of Law ........................................................................................................... 6
D. Hyperlinking ..................................................................................................................... 6
E. Unpublished Cases ............................................................................................................ 6
F. Oral Argument on Motions ............................................................................................... 6
G. Summary Judgment Motions ............................................................................................ 7
H. Preliminary Injunction Hearings ....................................................................................... 7
I. Motions to Exclude Testimony of Experts ....................................................................... 7
J. Default Judgment Motions ................................................................................................ 8
K. Proposed Stipulations and Orders ..................................................................................... 9
1
5. Other Pretrial Guidance....................................................................................................... 9
A. Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders .............................................................. 9
B. Settlement Agreements ..................................................................................................... 9
C. Bankruptcy Appeals ........................................................................................................ 10
6. Trial Submissions and Procedures .................................................................................... 10
A. Joint Pretrial Order .......................................................................................................... 10
B. Required Pretrial Filings ................................................................................................. 11
C. Electronic Copies of Exhibits and Exhibit Lists ............................................................. 12
D. Requests to Charge and Proposed Voir Dire .................................................................. 13
E. Additional Submissions in Non-Jury Cases .................................................................... 13
F. Filings in Opposition ...................................................................................................... 14
7. Redactions and Sealed Filings............................................................................................ 14
A. Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval..................................................................... 14
B. Redactions and Sealed Filings Requiring Court Approval ............................................. 14
C. Procedures for Filing Sealed or Redacted Documents ................................................... 14
8. Use of Electronic Devices and WiFi Access for Hearings and Trials ............................. 16
A. Use of Electronic Devices ............................................................................................... 16
B. WiFi Access for Hearings and Trials .............................................................................. 16
1. Guidelines for All Submissions
A. Text Searchable Submissions. Judge Furman reads most submissions in
electronic form using an iPad or computer. Accordingly, if feasible, every
submission should be in text-searchable format created by converting the
document electronically to PDF by computer (that is, not by scanning a printed
document). If a PDF is created by scanning a printed document (for instance, in
the case of a pre-existing documentary exhibit), the party should use software to
make the document text searchable whenever possible.
B. Amended or Corrected Filings. Any amended or corrected filing shall be filed
with a redline showing all differences between the original and revised filing.
C. Submission of Large Electronic Files. The Court has a file transfer protocol for
the safe electronic transmission of large files. If a party needs to submit large
files by email (as opposed to ECF), the party should email the Court (at
Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov) requesting a link to be used for
such transfer. The email should include the name and docket number of the case
and the nature and size of the materials to be submitted electronically.
D. No Courtesy Copies. Unless the Court orders otherwise, parties should not
submit courtesy copies of any submissions.
2
2. Communications with Chambers
A. Letters. Except as otherwise provided below, communications with the Court
should be by letter, filed electronically on ECF. Letters seeking relief should (if
consistent with the S.D.N.Y. Local Rules and the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing
Rules and Instructions) be filed on ECF as letter-motions in accordance with
Paragraph 4(A) below, not as ordinary letters.
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, letters may not exceed five pages in
length. Letters solely between parties or their counsel or otherwise not addressed
to the Court may not be filed on ECF or otherwise sent to the Court (except as
exhibits to an otherwise properly filed document).
B. Telephone Calls and Emails. Communications with Chambers, including
requests for extensions or adjournments, shall be by letter or letter-motion filed on
ECF in accordance with Paragraphs 2(A) and 4(A). For questions that cannot be
answered by reference to these Rules or for urgent matters requiring immediate
attention, email Chambers with the word “URGENT” in the subject. Technical
questions pertaining to ECF filings should be directed to the ECF Help Desk at
helpdesk@nysd.uscourts.gov or (212) 805-0800. Counsel may not submit
substantive case-related communications by email without leave of the Court.
C. Hand Deliveries. Hand-delivered mail should be left with the Court Security
Officers at the Worth Street entrance of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United
States District Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 and may not
be brought directly to Chambers. If the hand-delivered letter is urgent and
requires the Court’s immediate attention, ask the Court Security Officers to notify
Chambers that an urgent package has arrived that needs to be retrieved by
Chambers staff immediately.
D. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for
adjournments or extensions of time must be made in writing and filed on ECF as
letter-motions, not as ordinary letters, proposed stipulations, or proposed orders.
The letter-motion must state: (1) the original date(s); (2) the number of previous
requests for adjournment or extension; (3) whether these previous requests were
granted or denied; (4) the reasons for the requested extension; (5) whether the
adversary consents and, if not, the reasons given by the adversary for refusing to
consent; and (6) the date of the parties’ next scheduled appearance before the
Court as well as any other existing deadlines. If the extension will affect any
other deadlines in the case, the party seeking the extension should propose
amendments to those deadlines as well. Requests for extensions of deadlines
regarding a matter that has been referred to a Magistrate Judge shall be addressed
to that assigned Magistrate Judge.
Absent an emergency, any request for extension or adjournment shall be made at
least 48 hours prior to the deadline or scheduled appearance. Requests for
3
extensions will ordinarily be denied if made after the expiration of the original
deadline.
E. Related and Consolidated Cases. After an action has been accepted as related
to a prior filing, all future court papers and correspondence must contain the
docket number of the new filing as well as the docket number of the case to which
it is related (e.g., 12-CV-1234 [rel. 11-CV-4321]). After two or more actions
have been consolidated for all purposes under a single docket number pursuant to
Rule 42(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all future court papers and
correspondence should be filed only in the docket under which the cases have
been consolidated and should reference only that docket number.
F. ECF. In accordance with the Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions,
counsel are required to register promptly as ECF filers and to enter an appearance
in the case. Counsel are responsible for updating their contact information on
ECF, should it change, and they are responsible for checking the docket sheet
regularly, regardless of whether they receive an ECF notification of case activity.
For assistance with updating contact information, please contact the ECF Help
Desk at helpdesk@nysd.uscourts.gov or (212) 805-0800; do not file a letter-
motion advising the Court of the change.
G. Urgent Communications. As a general matter, materials filed via ECF are
reviewed by the Court the business day after they have been filed. If a submission
requires more immediate attention, the filing party should notify Chambers by
telephone after filing the submission on ECF.
3. Conferences
A. In-Person Conferences. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, all in-person
conferences will be held in Courtroom 24B of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan
United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York NY. If any counsel wishes
for a conference to be conducted remotely (by telephone or video), he or she
should confer with all other counsel and promptly file a letter-motion to that
effect in accordance with Paragraph 4(A).
B. Teleconferences. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any proceeding held by
telephone will be on the Court’s dedicated conference line, which can be accessed
by calling (855) 244-8681 and then entering Access Code 2303 019 3884,
followed by the pound (#) key. When prompted for an attendee ID number, press
the pound key again. The following procedures shall apply to all teleconferences
with the Court:
i. At least twenty-four hours before a scheduled teleconference, the parties
must jointly email to the Court the names and honorifics (e.g., Mr., Ms.,
Dr., etc.) of counsel — absent permission of the Court, no more than two
per party — who may speak during the teleconference. The email should
also provide the telephone numbers from which counsel expect to join the
4
call.
ii. Counsel should use a landline whenever possible, should use a headset
instead of speakerphone, and must mute themselves whenever they are not
speaking to eliminate background noise.
iii. To facilitate orderly teleconferences and the creation of an accurate
transcript where a teleconference is held on the record, counsel are
required to identify themselves every time they speak. Counsel should
spell any proper names for the court reporter. Counsel should also take
special care not to interrupt or speak over one another.
iv. If there is a beep or chime indicating that a new caller has joined while
counsel is speaking, counsel should pause to allow the Court to ascertain
the identity of the new participant and confirm that the court reporter has
not been dropped from the call.
v. Broadcasting or recording of any court conference is prohibited by law.
C. Attendance by Principal Trial Counsel. Absent leave of the Court, the attorney
who will serve as principal trial counsel must appear at all conferences with the
Court. Any attorney appearing before the Court must enter a notice of appearance
on ECF.
D. Discovery Disputes. Parties must follow Local Civil Rule 37.2 with the
following modifications. Any party wishing to raise a discovery dispute with the
Court must first confer in good faith with the opposing party, in person or by
telephone, in an effort to resolve the dispute. If this meet-and-confer process does
not resolve the dispute, either party may file on ECF a letter-motion, no longer
than three pages, explaining the nature of the dispute and, if applicable, why the
party is entitled to relief and requesting an informal conference. Any letter-
motion seeking relief must include a representation that the meet-and-confer
process occurred and was unsuccessful. Any opposition to a letter-motion shall
be filed as a letter, not to exceed three pages, within three business days. Counsel
should be prepared to discuss with the Court the matters raised by such letters, as
the Court will seek to resolve discovery disputes quickly, by order (based on the
letters alone) or in a conference. Counsel should seek relief in accordance with
these procedures in a timely fashion; if a party waits until near the close of
discovery to raise an issue that could have been raised earlier, the party is unlikely
to be granted the relief that it seeks or more time for discovery.
E. Participation by Junior Attorneys. The Court encourages the participation of
less experienced attorneys in all proceedings — including pretrial conferences,
hearings on discovery disputes, oral arguments, and examinations of witnesses at
trial — particularly where that attorney played a substantial role in drafting the
underlying filing or in preparing the relevant witness. The Court may be inclined
to grant a request for oral argument, which it generally disfavors, where doing so
would afford the opportunity for a junior attorney to gain courtroom experience.
5
Nevertheless, all attorneys appearing before the Court must have authority to bind
the party they represent consistent with the proceeding (for example, by agreeing
to a discovery or briefing schedule), and should be prepared to address any
matters likely to arise at the proceeding.
4. Motions
A. Letter-Motions. When permitted by the S.D.N.Y. Local Rules and the S.D.N.Y.
Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions, letters seeking relief should be filed
on ECF as letter-motions, not as ordinary letters. In particular, all requests for
adjournments, extensions, and pre-motion conferences (including pre-motion
conferences with respect to discovery disputes) should be filed as letter-motions.
B. Pre-Motion Conferences in Civil Cases. Pre-motion conferences are not
required, except for disputes concerning discovery, which are governed by
Paragraph 3(D) above.
C. Memoranda of Law. The typeface, margins, spacing, and length of motion
papers must conform to Local Civil Rule 7.1 (or, in the case of a motion for
reconsideration, Local Civil Rule 6.3). Per Local Civil Rule 7.1, memoranda of
law in support of and in opposition to motions (other than motions for
reconsideration) are limited to 8,750 words, and reply briefs are limited to 3,500
words. Memoranda exceeding 3,500 words shall contain a table of contents and a
table of authorities. Sur-reply memoranda will not be accepted without prior
permission of the Court. All appendices to memoranda of law must be indexed.
D. Hyperlinking.
i. Memoranda of law must include hyperlinks to (1) cited court decisions
(both reported and unpublished), statutes, rules, regulations, treatises, and
other legal authorities in either online legal research databases or in local,
state, or federal government websites; and (2) the docket entry of any cited
court documents, whether filed in federal or state court, except for
documents filed under seal or otherwise not in the public record.
ii. A party need not include hyperlinks in a memorandum if, in a footnote in
the memorandum, it certifies in good faith that it cannot include
hyperlinks as a result of technological limitations or other good cause.
E. Unpublished Cases. If a party cites to a case not available in an official reporter,
it need not provide copies of the case to Chambers if the case is available on
Westlaw.
F. Oral Argument on Motions. The Court rarely holds oral argument. But a party
may request oral argument by indicating “ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED”
on the cover page of its memorandum of law. If a party believes that the Court
6
would benefit from oral argument for a particular reason not obvious from the
parties’ briefing, the party may file a letter — not a letter-motion — explaining
the reason on ECF. Additionally, a party should advise the Court by letter if oral
argument would be handled by a less experienced attorney because, as discussed
in Paragraph 3(E) above, that may make the Court more inclined to hold oral
argument. If oral argument is requested, the Court will determine whether
argument will be heard and, if so, advise counsel of the argument date.
G. Summary Judgment Motions.
i. Absent good cause, the Court will not ordinarily have summary judgment
practice in a non-jury case.
ii. With respect to any deposition that is supplied, whether in whole or in
part, in connection with a summary judgment motion, the index to the
deposition should be included if it is available.
iii. The parties should provide the Court with an electronic, text-searchable
copy of any hearing or deposition transcript, or portion thereof, on which
the parties rely, if such a copy is available, unless doing so would be
unduly burdensome.
iv. Memoranda of law should include sections discussing the relevant
background and facts. Parties should not merely incorporate by reference
their Local Rule 56.1 Statements or Counterstatements.
v. If both sides intend to file summary judgment motions, the parties should
confer and propose (by letter-motion or orally at a conference) a briefing
structure, schedule, and page limits. To avoid redundancy, the Court will
generally, absent good reason, set a briefing schedule with deadlines for:
(1) one party to file the initial motion; (2) the other party to file a cross-
motion, with a single, consolidated memorandum of law supporting the
cross-motion and opposing the initial motion; (3) the first party to file a
single, consolidated memorandum of law replying in support of the initial
motion and opposing the cross-motion; and (4) the cross-moving party to
file a reply in support of the cross-motion.
H. Preliminary Injunction Hearings. If the Court holds an evidentiary hearing
with respect to a motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court will generally
follow the procedures for the conduct of non-jury trials described in Paragraph
6(E) below.
I. Motions to Exclude Testimony of Experts. Unless the Court orders otherwise,
motions to exclude the testimony of experts, pursuant to Rules 702-705 of the
Federal Rules of Evidence and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
509 U.S. 579 (1993), and its progeny, must be made by the deadline for
dispositive motions and should not be treated as motions in limine. Absent leave
7
of the Court, the moving party must file a single motion and single, consolidated
memorandum of law, consistent with Paragraph 4(C) above, even when seeking
to exclude the testimony of multiple experts.
J. Default Judgment Motions. If a party fails to respond to a claim, the party
asserting the claim should promptly move for entry of default judgment if
appropriate. If a failure to answer is the basis for the default, the party seeking a
default judgment must begin by seeking a Clerk’s Certificate of Default pursuant
to Local Civil Rule 55.1. Only after obtaining a Clerk’s Certificate of Default
should the party proceed to filing a motion for default judgment on ECF pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) and Local Civil Rule 55.2. (Counsel
should therefore seek and obtain a Clerk’s Certificate of Default well in advance
of any Court-imposed deadline to move for default judgment.)
A party seeking a default judgment should not proceed by order to show cause.
Any motion for default judgment must be supported by the following papers:
i. an attorney’s affidavit or declaration pursuant to Local Civil Rule
55.2(a)(1);
ii. a statement of damages, sworn or affirmed to by one or more people with
personal knowledge, showing the proposed damages and the basis for each
element of damages, including interest, attorney’s fees, and costs;
iii. a memorandum of law setting forth:
(a) the basis for entering a default judgment, including a description of
the method and date of service of the summons and complaint;
(b) the procedural history beyond service of the summons and
complaint, if any;
(c) legal authority for why such service was proper;
(d) the basis for subject-matter and personal jurisdiction;
(e) whether, if the default is applicable to fewer than all of the
counterparties, the Court may appropriately order a default
judgment on the issue of damages prior to resolution of the entire
action;
(f) legal authority for why an inquest into damages would be
unnecessary;
8
iv. if the proposed damages are supported by calculations, native versions of
the files with calculations (i.e., versions of the files in their original
format, such as in “.xlsx”), which shall be emailed to Chambers at
Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov;
v. a proposed default judgment;
vi. copies of all the operative pleadings;
vii. a copy of the affidavit of service of the summons and complaint; and
viii. a certificate of service stating that all documents in support of the request
for default judgment have been personally served on or mailed to the party
against whom default judgment is sought, pursuant to Local Civil Rule
55.2(a)(3).
K. Proposed Stipulations and Orders. In accordance with the Local Rules and the
Electronic Case Filing Rules and Instructions, parties should file on ECF all
proposed stipulations and orders that they wish the Court to sign, using the
appropriate ECF filing event. See SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions §§ 13.17-19 &
App’x A. As noted above, requests for extensions and adjournments must be made
by letter-motion, not by proposed stipulation or proposed order.
5. Other Pretrial Guidance
A. Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders. A party should confer with
his or her adversary before making an application for a temporary restraining
order unless the party seeking relief is able to satisfy the requirements for
obtaining temporary relief without notice to the adverse party set forth in Rule
65(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the absence of an emergency
that would justify seeking immediate relief in person, if the party seeking relief
(1) believes that Rule 65(b)(1)’s requirements can be met and a temporary
restraining order should issue without notice to the adverse party, the party should
file its papers on ECF under seal (or, if ECF is not a viable option, by email to
Chambers at Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov) and then email
Chambers with the words “URGENT: TRO” in the subject; or (2) is prepared to
seek relief on notice to the adverse party, the party seeking relief should
simultaneously file its papers on ECF, serve them on all other parties, and then
email Chambers, copying all other parties, with the words “URGENT: TRO” in
the subject.
B. Settlement Agreements. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not
retain jurisdiction to enforce confidential settlement agreements. If the parties
wish that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the
parties must place the terms of their agreement on the public record. The parties
may either provide a copy of the settlement agreement for the Court to endorse or
9
include the terms of their settlement agreement in their stipulation of settlement
and dismissal.
C. Bankruptcy Appeals. The parties must comply with the briefing schedule and
the format and length specifications set forth in the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure 8014-8018 unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
6. Trial Submissions and Procedures
A. Joint Pretrial Order. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no later than thirty
days after the date for the completion of all discovery or, in the event a dispositive
motion is filed, no later than thirty days after the Court’s ruling on such motion,
the parties shall both file on ECF, as a “Joint Pretrial Statement,” and submit by
email to the Court (Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov) a proposed
joint pretrial order, which shall include the following:
i. the full caption of the action;
ii. the names, law firms, addresses, telephone number, and email addresses of
trial counsel if not already listed on the docket;
iii. a brief statement by plaintiff (or, in a removed case, by defendant) as to
the basis of subject matter jurisdiction, and a brief statement by each other
party as to the presence or absence of subject matter jurisdiction. Such
statements shall include citations to all statutes relied on and relevant facts
as to citizenship and jurisdictional amount;
iv. a brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that the party
asserts remain to be tried, including citations to any statutes on which the
party relies. Such summaries shall also identify all claims and defenses
previously asserted that are not to be tried. The summaries should not
recite any evidentiary matter;
v. a statement as to the number of trial days needed and whether the case is
to be tried with or without a jury;
vi. a joint statement summarizing the nature of the case, to be read to
potential jurors during jury selection;
vii. a list of people, places, and institutions (in alphabetical order) that are
likely to be mentioned during the course of the trial, to be read to potential
jurors during jury selection;
viii. a statement as to whether all parties have consented to trial by a magistrate
judge, without identifying which parties do or do not consent;
10
ix. any stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law to which all parties
consent. In a jury case, the parties should memorialize any such
stipulations or agreed statements of fact or law in a standalone document
that can be marked and admitted at trial;
x. a list of all trial witnesses (in alphabetical order), indicating whether such
witnesses will testify in person or by deposition, whether such witnesses
will require an interpreter (and, if so, which party will pay the costs for the
interpreter), and a brief summary of the substance of each witness’s
testimony. Absent leave of the Court, a witness listed by both sides shall
testify only once (with the defendant(s) permitted to go beyond the scope
of the direct on cross-examination), and counsel should confer with
respect to scheduling;
xi. designations by each party of deposition testimony to be offered in its
case-in-chief and any counter-designations as follows:
(a) a chart listing (1) the designations and counter-designations;
(2) any objections, including the bases for such objections; (3) a
brief response to each objection; and
(b) transcripts of each relevant deposition with designations, counter-
designations, and objections highlighted in different colors.
The parties need not designate deposition testimony to be used for
impeachment purposes only. The parties should limit their designations to
those that they actually intend to use at trial;
xii. a list by each party of all exhibits to be offered in its case-in-chief, with a
single asterisk indicating exhibits to which no party objects on any ground.
If a party objects to an exhibit, the objection should be noted by indicating
the Federal Rule of Evidence that is the basis for the objection. If any
party believes that the Court should rule on such an objection in advance
of trial, that party should include a notation to that effect (e.g., “Advance
Ruling Requested”) as well. In general, the Court will rule on relevance
and authenticity objections at the time of trial;
xiii. a statement of the damages claimed and any other relief sought, including
the manner and method used to calculate any claimed damages and a
breakdown of the elements of such claimed damages; and
xiv. a statement of whether the parties consent to less than a unanimous
verdict.
B. Required Pretrial Filings. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, each party
shall file with the joint pretrial order:
11
i. in all cases, motions addressing any evidentiary issues or other matters
that should be resolved in limine. Absent leave of the Court, each party
must file a single memorandum of law, consistent with Paragraph 4(C)
above, in support of all motions in limine filed by that party. No motion
in limine will be considered or decided unless the moving party’s
memorandum of law includes a certification that, prior to filing the
motion, the parties conferred, in person or by telephone, in a good faith
effort to resolve the issue(s) asserted in the motion without the
intervention of the Court and were unable to reach an agreement;
ii. in all jury cases, joint requests to charge, joint proposed verdict forms, and
joint proposed voir dire questions as specified by Paragraph 6(D) below;
iii. in all non-jury cases, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The proposed findings of fact should be detailed and should include
citations to the proffered trial testimony and exhibits, as there may be no
opportunity for post-trial submissions. At the time of filing, parties should
also submit copies of these documents to the Court by email (Furman_
NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov), both in .pdf format and as a
Microsoft Word document;
C. Electronic Copies of Exhibits and Exhibit Lists. Unless otherwise ordered by
the Court, the parties shall also submit with the joint pretrial order (but not file on
ECF):
i. an electronic copy of each exhibit sought to be admitted (with each
filename corresponding to the relevant exhibit number — e.g., “PX-1,”
“DX-1,” etc.). (If the files are too large for submission by email, see
Paragraph 1(C) above.) If submission of electronic copies would be an
undue burden on a party, the party may seek leave of the Court (by letter-
motion filed on ECF) to submit prospective documentary exhibits in hard
copy. Each hard copy shall be pre-marked (that is, with an exhibit sticker)
and assembled sequentially in a loose leaf binder (not to exceed 2 1/2
inches in thickness) or in separate manila folders labeled with the exhibit
numbers and placed in redweld folders labeled with the case name and
docket number;
ii. the parties shall email to the Court (Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.
uscourts.gov) a Microsoft Word document listing all exhibits sought to be
admitted. The list shall contain four columns labeled as follows: (1)
“Exhibit Number”; (2) “Description” (of the exhibit); (3) “Date
Identified”; and (4) “Date Admitted.” The parties shall complete the first
two columns, but leave the third and fourth columns blank. Unless the
Court orders otherwise, the parties shall confer at the end of each trial day
and, no later than the beginning of the next trial day, email to the Court an
12
updated list indicating (in the third and fourth columns) each exhibit that
was identified and/or admitted.
D. Requests to Charge and Proposed Voir Dire. Unless otherwise ordered by the
Court, in all jury trials, joint requests to charge, joint proposed verdict forms, and
joint proposed voir dire questions shall be submitted as attachments to the
proposed joint pretrial order, with any differing proposals displayed in track-
change format and supported by authority or other justification. Absent good
reason, the parties should not include proposed language for standard instructions
(about, for example, the role of the Court and the jury, the standard of proof, etc.),
as the Court is likely to use its own standard instructions; instead, the parties
should include a list of standard instructions that they believe are appropriate and
focus their attention on case-specific requests to charge. At the time of filing, the
parties should also submit copies of these documents to the Court by email
(Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov) as Microsoft Word documents.
For any request to charge or proposed voir dire question on which the parties
cannot agree, each party should clearly set forth its proposed charge or question,
and briefly state why the Court should use its proposed charge or question, with
citations to supporting authority.
E. Additional Submissions in Non-Jury Cases. Unless otherwise ordered by the
Court, at the time the joint pretrial order is filed, each party in a non-jury trial
shall submit to the Court by email (Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.
gov) and serve on opposing counsel, but not file on ECF, the following:
i. Copies of affidavits constituting the direct testimony of each trial witness,
except for the direct testimony of an adverse party, a person whose
attendance is compelled by subpoena, or a person for whom the Court has
agreed to hear direct testimony live at the trial. The affidavit should be
treated as a direct substitute for the witness’s live testimony; that is,
counsel should be attentive to the Rules of Evidence (e.g., hearsay and the
like) and authenticate any exhibits that will be offered through that
witness’s testimony. Three business days after submission of such
affidavits, counsel for each party shall submit a list of all affiants whom he
or she intends to cross-examine at the trial. Only those witnesses who will
be cross-examined need to appear at trial. The original signed affidavits
should be brought to trial to be marked as exhibits, at which time any
objections to particular paragraphs of an affidavit can be made; and
ii. All deposition excerpts that will be offered as substantive evidence, as
well as a one-page synopsis of those excerpts for each deposition. Each
13
synopsis shall include page citations to the pertinent pages of the
deposition transcripts.
F. Filings in Opposition. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any party may file
the following documents within one week after the filing of the pretrial order, but
in no event later than three days before the scheduled trial date:
i. Opposition to any motion in limine; and
ii. Opposition to any legal argument in a pretrial memorandum.
7. Redactions and Sealed Filings
A. Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval. The parties are referred to Rule 5.2
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Southern District’s ECF Privacy
Policy (“Privacy Policy”). There are two categories of information that may be
redacted from public court filings without prior permission from the Court:
“sensitive information” and information requiring “caution.” Parties should not
include in their public filings, unless necessary, the five categories of “sensitive
information” (i.e., social security numbers [use the last four digits only], names of
minor children [use the initials only], dates of birth [use the year only], financial
account numbers [use the last four digits only], and home addresses [use only the
City and State]). Parties may also, without prior Court approval, redact from their
public filings the six categories of information requiring caution described in the
Privacy Policy (i.e., any personal identifying number, medical records [including
information regarding treatment and diagnosis], employment history, individual
financial information, proprietary or trade secret information, and information
regarding an individual’s cooperation with the government).
B. Redactions and Sealed Filings Requiring Court Approval. Except for
redactions permitted by the previous Paragraph, all redactions or sealing of
public court filings require Court approval. To be approved, any redaction or
sealing of a court filing must be narrowly tailored to serve whatever purpose
justifies the redaction or sealing and must be otherwise consistent with the
presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See, e.g., Lugosch v.
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). In general,
neither the parties’ consent nor the fact that information is subject to a
confidentiality agreement between litigants is, by itself, a valid basis to overcome
the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. See, e.g., In re
Gen. Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litig., No. 14-MD-2543 (JMF), 2015 WL
4750774, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 11, 2015).
C. Procedures for Filing Sealed or Redacted Documents. Any party seeking to
file a document under seal or in redacted form shall proceed as follows:
i. Meet and Confer. The party should meet and confer with any opposing
14
party (or any third party seeking confidential treatment of the information)
in advance to narrow the scope of the request. When a party seeks leave
to file a document under seal or in redacted form on the ground that an
opposing party or third party has requested it, the filing party shall notify
the opposing party or third party that it must file, within three business
days, a letter explaining the need to seal or redact the document.
ii. Sealed Document(s). The party shall file a letter-motion seeking leave to
file a document under seal on ECF in accordance with Standing Order 19-
MC-583 and Section 6 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and
Instructions. The letter motion itself shall be filed in public view, should
explain the reasons for seeking to file the document under seal, and should
not include confidential information. The proposed sealed document shall
be contemporaneously filed under seal on ECF (with the appropriate level
of restriction) and electronically related to the motion (or to the relevant
Court order if the Court previously granted leave to file the document
under seal). Note that the summary docket text, but not the document
itself, will be open to public inspection and, thus, should not include
confidential information sought to be filed under seal.
iii. Redacted Document(s). Where a party seeks leave to file a document in
redacted form, the party shall file a letter-motion seeking leave to file a
document in redacted form on ECF in accordance with Standing Order 19-
MC-583 and Section 6 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules and
Instructions. The letter-motion itself shall be filed in public view, should
explain the reasons for seeking to file the document in redacted form, and
should not include confidential information. At the same time, the party
shall (1) publicly file on ECF and electronically relate to the letter-motion
a copy of the document that implements the proposed redactions; and (2)
file under seal on ECF (with the appropriate level of restriction) and
electronically relate to the motion an unredacted copy of the document
with the proposed redactions highlighted.
iv. Submission by Email. Any party unable to comply with the requirements
for electronic filing under seal through the ECF system, or who believes
that a particular document should not be electronically filed at all, shall
file a letter-motion seeking leave of the Court to file in a different manner.
If the party is unable to file such a letter-motion on ECF, or believes there
is good cause not to file such a letter-motion on ECF, the party may
submit it by email (at Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov) as a
text-searchable .pdf attachment with a copy simultaneously delivered to all
counsel. Any such email shall state clearly in the subject line: (1) the
caption of the case, including the lead party names and docket number;
and (2) a brief description of the contents of the letter. Parties may not
include substantive communications in the body of the email; such
communications may be included only in the body of the letter.
15
8. Use of Electronic Devices and WiFi Access for Hearings and Trials
A. Use of Electronic Devices. Electronic devices (including mobile telephones,
personal electronic devices, and computers) may not be used in Judge Furman’s
Courtroom without his permission. More broadly, the use of any such devices
within the Courthouse and its environs is governed by the Court’s Standing Order
M10-468, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-
06/standing-order-electronic-devices.pdf. If required by the Standing Order,
counsel seeking to bring a device into the Courthouse shall submit an Electronic
Device and Wi-Fi Access Request Form, available on the Court’s website, to the
Court by e-mail (Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov) as early as
possible — and certainly no later than three business days before the final
pretrial or pre-hearing conference. If approved and signed by Judge Furman, a
copy of the Order will be sent to the requesting attorney, who will receive a
network name, username, password, and instructions from the District
Executive’s Office on or before the first day of the scheduled proceeding. (Note
that WiFi access is actually managed by the District Executive’s Office, not
Chambers, so any questions regarding WiFi access should be directed to the
District Executive’s Office.) Wi-Fi access is limited to the approved attorney
(who may not share his or her username or password with others) for the duration
of the proceeding and for Courtroom 24B (unless Judge Furman or another
judicial officer grants permission for it to be used in another courtroom). If an
attorney wishes to test the Wi-Fi prior to the proceeding, that request must also be
made to Chambers at least three business days prior to the proceeding. Requests
submitted later than three business days prior to the relevant final pretrial or pre-
hearing conference may be denied on that basis alone. If permitted by the
Standing Order, mobile telephones are permitted inside the Courtroom, but they
MUST be kept turned off at all times. Non-compliance with this rule may result in
forfeiture of the device for the remainder of the proceedings.
B. WiFi Access for Hearings and Trials. Attorneys participating in a hearing or
trial may obtain authorization to use the Court’s WiFi system in Judge Furman’s
Courtroom during the proceeding. For further information, see Judge Furman’s
Individual Rules and Practices for Hearings and Trials, available on Judge
Furman’s webpage.
16
Other judges in S.D.N.Y.
- Stewart D. Aaron
- Ronnie Abrams
- Kim P. Berg
- Richard M. Berman
- Vincent L. Briccetti
- Vernon S. Broderick
- Naomi Reice Buchwald
- Valerie E. Caproni
- Andrew L. Carter Jr.
- P. Kevin Castel
- Sarah L. Cave
- Jessica G. L. Clarke
- Denise L. Cote
- John P. Cronan
- Paul A. Crotty
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Katherine Polk Failla
- Valerie Figueredo
- Paul G. Gardephe
- Margaret M. Garnett
- Gabriel W. Gorenstein
- Philip M. Halpern
- Alvin K. Hellerstein
- Dale E. Ho
- Lewis A. Kaplan
- Kenneth M. Karas
- John G. Koeltl
- Andrew E. Krause
- Robert W. Lehrburger
- Lewis J. Liman
- Victor Marrero
- Judith C. McCarthy
- Colleen McMahon
- Barbara Moses
- Alison J. Nathan
- Sarah Netburn
- J. Paul Oetken
- Katharine H. Parker
- Loretta A. Preska
- Jed S. Rakoff
- Edgardo Ramos
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Victoria Reznik
- Henry J. Ricardo
- Jennifer L. Rochon
- Nelson S. Roman
- Lorna G. Schofield
- Cathy Seibel
- Louis L. Stanton
- Gary Stein
- Sidney H. Stein
- Arun Subramanian
- Richard J. Sullivan
- Laura Taylor Swain
- Robyn F. Tarnofsky
- Analisa Torres
- Jeannette A. Vargas
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Ona T. Wang
- Jennifer E. Willis
- Kimba M. Wood
- Gregory H. Woods
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Jesse M. Furman.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.