Hon. Sidney H. Stein — Individual Rules of Practice
S.D.N.Y.
This judge's published rules are on file below; no quick-answer fields have been extracted yet.
No individual facts have been extracted from this page yet. The full published text is below, exactly as the court publishes it.
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
Effective December 10, 2025
INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE SIDNEY H. STEIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007
Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Stein, civil matters before Judge Stein shall be
conducted in accordance with the following practices:
1. Communications With Chambers
A. Letters. Except as otherwise provided below, communications with chambers shall be by
letter filed electronically on ECF. Copies of correspondence between counsel shall not be
sent to the Court. Courtesy copies of letters filed via ECF are not necessary.
B. Telephone Calls. Except as provided in Paragraph 1(D) and Paragraph 3(B)(i) below,
telephone calls to chambers are permitted only in emergency situations requiring
immediate attention. In such situations only, call chambers at (212) 805-0192.
C. Faxes. Faxes to chambers are not permitted.
D. Docketing, Scheduling, and Calendar Matters. For docketing, scheduling and calendar
matters, call Laura Blakely at (212) 805-0087.
E. Requests for Adjournments or Extensions of Time. All requests for adjournments or
extensions of time must be made in writing and filed on ECF as letter motions. All such
letter motions must state: (1) the original date, (2) the number of previous requests for
adjournment or extension, (3) whether these previous requests were granted or denied, and
(4) whether the adversary consents, and, if not, the reasons given by the adversary for
refusing to consent. If the requested adjournment or extension affects any other scheduled
dates, a proposed Revised Scheduling Order (reflecting only business days) must be
attached.
i. If the request is for an adjournment of a court appearance, absent an emergency
it shall be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled appearance.
2. Motions & Pleadings
A. Courtesy Copies of a New Complaint. After a civil case has been electronically filed and
assigned to Judge Stein, the filing attorney shall submit a paper copy of the initiating
pleadings to chambers within five business days of the filing. The paper copy shall be
submitted in accordance with SDNY policies regarding mail deliveries.
B. Pre-Motion Conferences in Civil Cases. Pre-motion conferences are not required.
C. Memoranda of Law. Memoranda of law in support of and in opposition to motions, if
filed by an attorney or prepared with a computer, may not exceed 8,750 words, and reply
briefs may not exceed 3,500 words. If filed by a party who is not represented by an
attorney and handwritten or prepared with a typewriter, memoranda of law in support of
and in opposition to motions may not exceed 25 pages, and reply memoranda may not
exceed 10 pages. Memoranda that are 3,500 words or more or 10 pages or more shall
contain a table of contents and a table of authorities, which are not included in these page
or word limits. However, footnotes and endnotes are included in these limits.
D. Filing of Motion Papers. Each party shall file its motion papers at the same time as they
are served.
E. Courtesy Copies. The moving party shall furnish a complete set of courtesy copies to
chambers as soon as is practical after a motion has been fully briefed. Courtesy copies
shall be marked as such and submitted in accordance with SDNY policies regarding mail
deliveries.
F. Oral Argument on Motions. Parties may request oral argument by letter at the time their
moving or opposing or reply papers are filed. The Court will determine whether argument
will be heard and, if so, will advise counsel of the argument date.
G. Discovery Disputes. Any party wishing to raise a discovery dispute with the Court must
first meet and confer in good faith with the opposing party, in person if the attorneys
practice in New York, in an effort to resolve the dispute. If this meet-and-confer process
does not resolve the dispute, any party may submit a letter to the Court via ECF, no longer
than three pages, explaining the nature of the dispute and requesting an informal
conference. Such letter must include a representation that the meet-and-confer process
occurred and was unsuccessful. If the opposing party wishes to respond to the letter, it
must do so within two business days.
3. Pretrial Procedures
Joint Pretrial Orders in Civil Cases. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, 45 days
prior to trial, the parties shall submit to the Court for its approval a joint pretrial order that
includes the following information:
i. The full caption of the action.
ii. The names, addresses (including firm names), and telephone numbers of trial
counsel.
2
iii. A brief statement by plaintiff as to the basis of subject matter jurisdiction, and a
brief statement by each other party as to the presence or absence of subject matter
jurisdiction.
iv. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that party has asserted
which remain to be tried, without recital of evidentiary matter but including
citations to all statutes relied on. Such summaries shall identify all claims and
defenses previously asserted which are not to be tried.
v. A statement by each party as to whether the case is to be tried with or without a
jury, and the number of trial days needed for each party.
vi. A statement as to whether or not all parties have consented to trial of the case by
a magistrate judge (without identifying which parties have or have not so
consented).
vii. Any stipulations or statements of fact or law which have been agreed to by all
parties.
viii. A statement by each party as to the witnesses whose testimony is to be offered in
its case in chief, indicating whether such witnesses will testify in person or by
deposition, and a summary of that witnesses’ expected testimony.
ix. A designation by each party of deposition testimony to be offered in its case in
chief, with any cross-designations and objections by any other party, along with
the evidentiary basis for the objection.
x. A list by each party of exhibits to be offered in its case in chief, with a star
indicating exhibits to which a party objects, and the evidentiary bases for the
objections.
xi. Proposed requests to charge in cases to be tried to a jury.
xii. Proposed voir dire questions in cases to be tried to a jury.
xiii. Motions addressing any evidentiary or other issues which should be resolved in
limine; and
xiv. In any case where such party believes it would be useful, a pretrial memorandum.
3
4. Applications for Entry of Default Judgment. Parties seeking entry of a default judgment
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) and Local Civil Rule 55.2(b) shall move,
on notice to the adversary, specifying a return date at least 10 days from the date of service,
returnable at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 23A. The motion shall include: (a) the notice of motion;
(b) a completed clerk’s certificate of default; (c) the claim to which no response has been made;
and (d) a proposed form of default judgment.
5. Electronic Filing Under Seal in Civil and Miscellaneous Cases
A. Sealing/Redactions Not Requiring Court Approval. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
5.2 describes sensitive information that must be redacted from public court filings without
seeking prior permission from the Court.
B. Sealing/Redaction Requiring Court Approval. Motions or Letter Motions for approval
of sealed or redacted filings in civil and miscellaneous cases and the subject documents,
including the proposed sealed document(s), must be filed electronically through the court’s
ECF system in conformity with the Court’s standing order, 19-mc-00583, and ECF Rules
& Instructions, section 6.
The motion must be filed in public view, must explain the particular reasons for seeking to
file that information under seal and should not include confidential information sought to
be filed under seal. Supporting papers must be separately filed electronically and may be
filed under seal or redacted only to the extent necessary to safeguard information sought to
be filed under seal.
The proposed sealed document must be contemporaneously filed under seal in the ECF
system and electronically related to the motion. The summary docket text, but not the
sealed document, will be open to public inspection and should not include confidential
information sought to be filed under seal.
Where the motion seeks approval to redact information from a document that is to be
publicly filed, the filing party shall: (a) publicly file the document with the proposed
redactions, and (b) electronically file under seal a copy of the unredacted document with
the proposed redactions highlighted. Both documents must be electronically filed through
the ECF system and related to the motion.
Any party unable to comply with the requirement for electronic filing under seal through
the ECF system, or who has reason to believe that a particular document should not be
electronically filed, must move for leave of the Court to file in the traditional manner, on
paper.
4
Other judges in S.D.N.Y.
- Stewart D. Aaron
- Ronnie Abrams
- Kim P. Berg
- Richard M. Berman
- Vincent L. Briccetti
- Vernon S. Broderick
- Naomi Reice Buchwald
- Valerie E. Caproni
- Andrew L. Carter Jr.
- P. Kevin Castel
- Sarah L. Cave
- Jessica G. L. Clarke
- Denise L. Cote
- John P. Cronan
- Paul A. Crotty
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Katherine Polk Failla
- Valerie Figueredo
- Jesse M. Furman
- Paul G. Gardephe
- Margaret M. Garnett
- Gabriel W. Gorenstein
- Philip M. Halpern
- Alvin K. Hellerstein
- Dale E. Ho
- Lewis A. Kaplan
- Kenneth M. Karas
- John G. Koeltl
- Andrew E. Krause
- Robert W. Lehrburger
- Lewis J. Liman
- Victor Marrero
- Judith C. McCarthy
- Colleen McMahon
- Barbara Moses
- Alison J. Nathan
- Sarah Netburn
- J. Paul Oetken
- Katharine H. Parker
- Loretta A. Preska
- Jed S. Rakoff
- Edgardo Ramos
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Victoria Reznik
- Henry J. Ricardo
- Jennifer L. Rochon
- Nelson S. Roman
- Lorna G. Schofield
- Cathy Seibel
- Louis L. Stanton
- Gary Stein
- Arun Subramanian
- Richard J. Sullivan
- Laura Taylor Swain
- Robyn F. Tarnofsky
- Analisa Torres
- Jeannette A. Vargas
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Ona T. Wang
- Jennifer E. Willis
- Kimba M. Wood
- Gregory H. Woods
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Sidney H. Stein.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.