Hon. Jed S. Rakoff — Individual Rules of Practice
S.D.N.Y.
Courtroom: 1340
What Jed S. Rakoff's rules say, in the court's own words
Every answer below is copied exactly from the court's published page for this part. Nothing is paraphrased or inferred.
Which courtroom hears this part?
1340
“Chambers Courtroom Room 1340 Room 14-B”
Full published rules for individual rules of practice
Effective June 3, 2024
INDIVIDUAL RULES OF PRACTICE - HON. JED S. RAKOFF
Chambers Courtroom
Room 1340 Room 14-B
United States Courthouse United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street 500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007 New York, NY 10007
(212) 805-0401 (212) 805-0129
RakoffNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov
1. Written or E-mail Communications
(a) All communications with Chambers must be by means of
joint telephone calls, as described in Rule 2, infra.
Correspondence with the Court (whether by letter, email, or
otherwise), filing correspondence on ECF or docketing
correspondence with the Clerk of Court, and copying the Court on
correspondence with others, is strictly forbidden, except as
specifically authorized by these rules or expressly requested by
the Court. Even if the Court emails an order, opinion, or other
communication to the parties, the parties may not respond by email
unless the Court directs them to do so.
(b) Where specifically authorized by these rules or expressly
requested by the Court, e-mail communication shall be sent to
RakoffNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov as .pdf attachments with
copies simultaneously delivered to all counsel. Emails shall state
clearly in the subject line (i) the full caption of the case,
including the party names and docket number, and (ii) the contents
of the email. The beginning of the email communication must clearly
1
state the contents and purpose of the email. Copies of
correspondence between counsel shall not be sent to the Court.
2. Oral Communication; Motions and Applications
(a) No ex parte communication with Chambers is permitted,
even on consent of opposing counsel, except for those limited
applications in criminal cases expressly permitted by statute to
be made ex parte or when counsel for a party has not yet entered a
notice of appearance. Counsel for all affected parties must be on
the line whenever a telephone call to Chambers is placed; however,
all similarly situated parties may, if they wish, designate a
“lead” counsel in advance to represent them on any such call. All
attorneys participating in a phone conference with Chambers must
have appeared on the docket or have filed a motion for pro hac vice
admission. The Judge and/or his clerks are normally available to
receive telephone calls between 9:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. and 1:30
p.m. - 5:30 p.m. If calling within these hours, counsel need not
schedule a telephone call to Chambers in advance. Please first
provide the docket number of the case when a Chambers staff member
answers the telephone. If all lines are busy, the call will be
transferred to voicemail. Any message left on the Chambers
voicemail or with Chambers staff must include the docket number of
the case and the names and telephone numbers of all participating
counsel.
On calls to Chambers, parties should be prepared to state
clearly and succinctly (1) the nature of their application (the
relief requested of the Court); (2) the reasons for their
application; and (3) whether a given application is opposed by
another party. If the dispute concerns a specific document (e.g.,
a discovery request), the party making the application should be
prepared to email a copy of the document to Chambers during the
2
call, should the Court request it.
(b) In order to bring on any contemplated motion or
application of any kind whatever, excepting only a motion for
admission pro hac vice (which may be filed without prior
authorization) or the ex parte criminal applications referred to
above, counsel for all affected parties must jointly call Chambers
in the manner prescribed above. No party will ever be denied the
right to make a motion permitted by law; but if the Court determines
that the matter can be resolved telephonically, it will hear the
application or motion immediately and issue a ruling then or
shortly thereafter (orally, or, if so requested by counsel, in
writing). If, conversely, the matter requires motion papers and/or
in-court argument, a schedule for same will be determined at the
time of the call. In criminal cases, however, any party can demand
that any non-scheduling matter brought up in a telephone conference
be the subject of an in-court hearing before decision.
(c) If counsel for any party seeks to convene a call to
Chambers, counsel for all other affected parties are expected to
make themselves available for such a call within 24 hours of the
request. If, after successive attempts, counsel for any affected
party is unavailable for the call, the initiating party may then
send Chambers and all affected counsel an email or a letter, not
to exceed two double-spaced pages, describing the efforts made to
convene a conference call and briefly describing the proposed
motion or application. In such a case, per Rule l, supra, no reply
or other correspondence is permitted, but a conference with the
Court will be promptly arranged. Notwithstanding these rules
applicable to parties represented by counsel, if one of the parties
is an incarcerated person proceeding pro se, the initiating party
may send all affected counsel, the pro se party, and Chambers a
letter describing the application.
(d) Where motion papers are necessary, counsel for the
3
moving party, following the scheduling of the motion, shall file
a short Notice of Motion setting forth a one-sentence description
of the motion, the schedule for service and filing of the various
parties’ papers, and the date and time of oral argument as set by
the Court. Motion papers shall consist of moving papers, answering
papers, and the moving party’s reply papers (when permitted). Any
legal memoranda must include a table of authorities, arranged
alphabetically, with case citations including accurate pin or jump
citations. Each party must file its respective papers with the
Clerk of the Court on the same date that such papers are served.
Counsel should be prepared to provide hard copies of motion papers
if requested; however, courtesy copies of motion papers should not
be provided absent explicit request (although counsel should note
that other provisions of these rules require hard-copy courtesy
copies for various pre-trial filings).
(e) Unless otherwise specified by the Court, any memorandum
of law submitted with the moving papers or the answering papers
on any motion is limited to 25 double-spaced pages, and any reply
memorandum is limited to 10 double-spaced pages. Both the text and
footnotes in such memoranda of law must be in 12 point type on 8½
by 11 inch paper (or the electronic equivalent), with Times New
Roman type preferred. If the Court permits letter briefing in lieu
of formal memoranda, the rule on font size for text and footnotes
still applies. With respect to motions for summary judgment, Local
Civil Rule 56.1 will be strictly enforced. Citations to the record
in any memorandum of law filed in connection with a motion for
summary judgment must include a citation to the party’s Local Civil
Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Fact or opposition thereto.
(f) All documents filed on ECF must be word-searchable to
the extent reasonably practicable.
4
3. Initial Conferences and Civil Discovery
(a) In civil cases, an initial conference will be held no
later than six weeks after filing of the Complaint (and often
earlier) regardless of whether issue has been joined.
(b) No later than three business days prior to the initial
conference, the parties to a civil case must email Chambers a
written report of their agreements or disagreements regarding case
management and discovery and a proposed Case Management Plan in a
form corresponding to the Court’s Case Management Order Form (Form
D). In formulating their Case Management Plan, the parties should
bear in mind that all discovery and post-discovery motion practice
must be completed prior to the trial-ready date set by the Court,
which will appear on the Form D furnished to the parties along
with the notice of the initial conference. This may not be the
actual trial date, but will be the date following which the parties
will not be heard to complain that they are not ready for trial.
Interrogatories are strictly limited to those authorized by Local
Civil Rule 33.3(a), and no deposition may extend beyond one
business day without prior leave of the Court. At the initial
conference, the Court will issue a binding Case Management Order
that, in most cases, will require the case to be ready for trial
within five months of the date thereof. If the parties submit a
proposed case management plan that makes any modification to the
Court’s Case Management Order Form (Form D) other than filling in
the blank lines, they must submit a redline indicating any change
from the Court’s Form D.
(c) In criminal cases, an initial conference with the Court
will be held promptly after presentment before a Magistrate Judge.
At this conference, in addition to arraignment, the Court will set
a schedule for the completion of discovery and the filing of any
motions. Where motions are permitted, the length and format of any
5
memoranda of law must be in accordance with Rule 2(e), supra. The
Court does not participate in the S.D.N.Y. Plan for Certain § 1983
Cases Against the City of New York.
4. Trial-Pending Exchanges and Pretrial Orders in Civil Cases
(a) The trial-pending exchanges among the parties mandated by
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) shall be strictly enforced, except that
the disclosures prescribed therein may be made 21 (instead of 30)
days before trial.
(b) In addition, in all civil cases, the parties shall jointly
file with the Court, no later than one week prior to trial, a
proposed Pretrial Consent Order (plus a courtesy hard copy of same
for submission to Chambers) consisting of the following items:
(i) A joint overview of the case.
(ii) A particularized description of each party’s remaining
claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, or third-party
claims (failure to specify which will be deemed a
waiver).
(iii) A particularized statement of the specific facts,
stipulations, admissions, and other matters on which
the parties agree.
(iv) Each party’s particularized contentions as to the
specific facts that are disputed. (In addition, in non-
jury cases, the parties, following trial, will be
required to submit proposed findings of fact, with
citations to the record, and proposed conclusions of
law.)
(v) A particularized statement of the injunctive relief,
declaratory relief, and/ or damages claimed (including
amounts) for each claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or
third-party claim.
6
(vi) A list of the names of the witnesses (both fact
witnesses and expert witnesses) that each party
intends to call, in the likely order of appearance.
This should be a final and binding list, without
qualifications or reservations. A witness whose name
appears on the list of more than one party will testify
only once but may be examined at that time by all
parties on all relevant matters.
(vii) A list of all exhibits to be offered by each party,
and particularized objections thereto noted in
accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3).
(viii) A final estimate of the length of trial (assuming a
typical trial day of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday).
5. Pretrial Exchanges in Criminal Cases
Each of the parties in a criminal case must submit to the
Court at least 30 days before trial any disclosures pertaining to
expert witnesses under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16. Each
of the parties in a criminal case must deliver to the Courthouse
mailroom for delivery directly to Chambers at least three business
days before trial: (a) a final and binding list of the witnesses
that the party expects to call (other than the defendant), in the
likely order of appearance, and (b) a list of the exhibits that
the party expects to offer on its direct case.
6. Deposition Transcripts and Trial Exhibits
(a) In all civil cases, the parties shall deliver to the
Courthouse mailroom for delivery directly to Chambers at least
three business days before trial marked-up copies of the portions
7
of transcripts of depositions intended to be read into evidence,
with particularized objections noted thereon in accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3).
(b) In all civil and criminal trials, the parties during trial
shall tender to the bench two copies of any exhibit a party seeks
to offer into evidence at the same time the party hands the original
exhibit to a witness during an examination. Plaintiff’s and
defendant’s exhibits shall both be marked by numbers (e.g.,
“Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1,” “Defendant’s Exhibit 1”).
(c) Parties are not required to provide the Court with copies
of exhibits in advance of trial, but are expected to have all
exhibits available on the morning of the start of trial.
7. Proposed Jury Charges
In all jury cases, whether civil or criminal, proposed jury
charges must be submitted to the Court at least one week before
trial. Any proposed jury charge submitted thereafter will not be
considered by the Court, except upon a showing that the proposed
charge relates to an issue that could not reasonably have been
expected to arise at trial. In addition, the Court’s standard
practice is to give the jury a one-page preliminary instruction
shortly before or after opening statements, highlighting some of
the issues and legal requirements in the case. The parties should
submit their proposals in that regard at least three business days
before trial.
8. Proposed Voir Dire Requests
In all jury cases, whether civil or criminal, proposed voir
dire requests must be submitted to the Court at least three
business days before the start of jury selection. In both civil
8
and criminal cases, the jury will be selected by the traditional
“jury box” method. The Court does not use jury questionnaires.
Except in rare circumstances, the Court will conduct all
questioning at voir dire.
9. Motions in Limine
Motions in limine are not a matter of right and should be
largely limited to critical matters on which pre-trial rulings are
critical. After a trial date is set, any party, without further
leave of Court, may serve such a motion directed at limiting the
proof at trial, provided the motion is served upon all parties by
no later than two weeks before trial. All such motions in limine,
and any opposition thereto, must be filed with the Clerk of the
Court and courtesy copies submitted to Chambers at least one week
before trial. Any party referencing a proposed trial exhibit in
such motion papers must submit a courtesy copy of that exhibit to
the Court along with the motion papers. Such motions will normally
be resolved by the Court on the morning of the first day of trial.
Each motion in limine is limited to 15 double-spaced pages,
but each party is strictly limited to 30 total double-spaced pages
for all motions in limine combined, unless it seeks leave of the
Court for a greater page limit no later than two weeks before
trial.
10. Stipulations of Settlement and Discontinuance
No adjournments will be granted on the grounds of settlement
unless the parties have submitted to Chambers a stipulation or
letter on behalf of all parties affirming that the case has been
finally settled and that the Court may dismiss the case with
prejudice. Except for good cause shown, no such stipulation shall
9
be accepted that provides for re-opening of the case more than 30
days after dismissal or that provides for the Court to retain
jurisdiction for more than 30 days following dismissal except to
enforce injunctive relief.
11. Summations in Civil Cases
In all civil trials, plaintiff’s counsel will sum up first,
followed by defendant’s counsel. Where there is only one defense
summation, plaintiff’s counsel will normally not be permitted a
rebuttal summation except in unusual circumstances. Where there
are two or more defense summations, plaintiff’s counsel will
normally be permitted a brief rebuttal.
12. Sentencing
Sentencing will normally take place within 90 days of the entry
of a guilty plea or finding of guilt at trial, except in the case
of defendants who have entered into “cooperation agreements” with
the Government. With respect to cooperating defendants, counsel
will be required at the time of plea to propose a sentencing date
that will give the defendant adequate opportunity to demonstrate
substantial assistance and provide the Court with adequate
opportunity to assess such assistance. If adopted by the Court,
such sentencing date will not be further extended except upon a
showing of unusual circumstances, and in no event will sentencing
be adjourned beyond three years from the date of plea. Any written
submission relating to any sentence must be submitted to the Court
at least one week before the date of sentencing, and any response
thereto must be submitted to the Court at least two business days
before the date of sentencing.
10
13. “Brady” Disclosures
Materials and information required to be disclosed pursuant
to Brady v. Maryland and its progeny (“Brady Material”) – whether
in written or recorded format, or otherwise – must be disclosed
to defense counsel according to the following schedule:
(1) Brady Material known to the Government at the time of
indictment – other than purely impeachment materials and
information required to be produced pursuant to Giglio v. United
States and its progeny (“Giglio Material”) – must be produced to
defense counsel no later than two weeks following the date of the
filing of the indictment, regardless of whether the parties are
engaged in plea discussions. Such Brady Material includes (simply
by way of example) not only information that tends to exculpate a
defendant or support a potential defense to the charged offense(s),
but also information that tends to mitigate the degree of the
defendant’s culpability or to mitigate punishment. Also, this
requirement applies regardless of whether the Government credits
the Brady Material.
(2) Brady Material (other than Giglio Material) that becomes
known to the Government following filing of the indictment must
be disclosed, absent exceptional circumstances, within two weeks
of when it becomes known and, in any event, no later than four
weeks prior to any trial or guilty plea.
(3) Absent exceptional circumstances, Giglio Material must be
disclosed four weeks prior to the date of the start of trial or
guilty plea. Such material includes (simply by way of example) a
witness’s prior inconsistent statements, written or oral; benefits
given and promises made to the witness; information that tends to
show that the witness has a personal motive to inculpate the
defendant; and information that tends to show that the witness has
a physical or mental impairment that could affect the witness’s
11
ability to perceive, recall, or recount relevant events. Giglio
Material developed less than four weeks before trial (e.g., as a
result of further interviews of witnesses) must be disclosed
immediately.
(4) To achieve adequate compliance with the foregoing rules,
the Government has a continuing obligation to seek Brady Material
and Giglio Material from law enforcement and regulatory agencies
that are or have been involved in the prosecution of the defendant
or in parallel proceedings or investigations involving the
defendant.
(5) The above time-tables, being necessary to fulfill the
constitutional obligations imposed by Brady v. Maryland, Giglio v.
United States, and their progeny, apply regardless of whether the
Brady Material and Giglio Material also happen to be producible
pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or the Jencks
Act and the time-tables applicable thereto.
(6) For good cause shown, the Government may seek a protective
order delaying disclosure of such materials and information, but
applications for such orders should only be made in exceptional
circumstances.
14. Protective Orders and Filing of Documents Under Seal
(a) All parties that wish to propose a protective order must,
after receiving the Court’s permission in accordance with Rule
2(b), supra, submit a proposed protective order that conforms as
closely as possible with the Court’s Model Protective Order, which
is available on the Judge’s website. If the parties alter the
Court’s Model Protective Order in any way other than conforming
the caption and signatures, they must provide a redline indicating
all such modifications by email to Chambers.
(b) Unless the Protective Order approved in a case provides
12
otherwise, parties must request the Court’s permission, in
accordance with Rule 2(b), supra, to file documents under seal.
The Court’s Model Protective Order does not provide such
permission. Parties are expected to provide the Court with notice
at least three business days before the relevant filing deadline
if they wish to file documents under seal.
(c) No document may be filed under seal without prior
application to the Court as described above. After obtaining the
Court’s leave, the document must be filed under seal in the ECF
system. Where a party has received approval to redact information
from a document that is to be publicly filed, that party shall
publicly file the document with the redactions, and electronically
file under seal a copy of the unredacted document. Both documents
must be electronically filed through the ECF system. When filing
documents under seal, parties are expected to provide the Court
electronic copies of the underlying documents via email. If hard
copies are necessary, they will be requested.
15. Electronics Orders
The Court welcomes parties to use technology appropriately
in the courtroom. Should any counsel seek to bring an electronic
device into the courthouse or seek access to the courthouse WiFi,
they should email the Courthouse’s Fillable Form for Electronic
Devices to Judge Rakoff’s Courtroom Deputy, Linda Kotowski, at
linda_kotowski@nysd.uscourts.gov.
13
Other judges in S.D.N.Y.
- Stewart D. Aaron
- Ronnie Abrams
- Kim P. Berg
- Richard M. Berman
- Vincent L. Briccetti
- Vernon S. Broderick
- Naomi Reice Buchwald
- Valerie E. Caproni
- Andrew L. Carter Jr.
- P. Kevin Castel
- Sarah L. Cave
- Jessica G. L. Clarke
- Denise L. Cote
- John P. Cronan
- Paul A. Crotty
- Paul A. Engelmayer
- Katherine Polk Failla
- Valerie Figueredo
- Jesse M. Furman
- Paul G. Gardephe
- Margaret M. Garnett
- Gabriel W. Gorenstein
- Philip M. Halpern
- Alvin K. Hellerstein
- Dale E. Ho
- Lewis A. Kaplan
- Kenneth M. Karas
- John G. Koeltl
- Andrew E. Krause
- Robert W. Lehrburger
- Lewis J. Liman
- Victor Marrero
- Judith C. McCarthy
- Colleen McMahon
- Barbara Moses
- Alison J. Nathan
- Sarah Netburn
- J. Paul Oetken
- Katharine H. Parker
- Loretta A. Preska
- Edgardo Ramos
- Jennifer H. Rearden
- Victoria Reznik
- Henry J. Ricardo
- Jennifer L. Rochon
- Nelson S. Roman
- Lorna G. Schofield
- Cathy Seibel
- Louis L. Stanton
- Gary Stein
- Sidney H. Stein
- Arun Subramanian
- Richard J. Sullivan
- Laura Taylor Swain
- Robyn F. Tarnofsky
- Analisa Torres
- Jeannette A. Vargas
- Mary Kay Vyskocil
- Ona T. Wang
- Jennifer E. Willis
- Kimba M. Wood
- Gregory H. Woods
Read the court's own published rules for Hon. Jed S. Rakoff.
Compare across judges
Get an e-mail when this judge's part rules change
Free. At most one e-mail a day, only when something actually changed. Double opt-in to confirm, one-click to unsubscribe.